ext3-fs error ext3_readdir bad entry in directory Fairview Wyoming

Address 878 N Washington St, Afton, WY 83110
Phone (307) 880-9985
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error ext3_readdir bad entry in directory Fairview, Wyoming

New tech, old clothes Need book id. Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . For your system drive you can usually get away with it, but if you suspect some programs still use atime, then you probably want to use relatime instead - which these Sep 26 17:15:41 host pure-ftpd: ([email protected]) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [solarromancecom] Sep 26 17:15:41 host pure-ftpd: ([email protected]) [INFO] Logout.

you can use debugfs: debugfs: ncheck ncheck: Usage: ncheck ... As far as I can tell from other tests and more reading, I did things right, but its hard not to drone on things and constantly second guess yourself when things apport-collect -p linux 403026 Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. A smarctl -t long /dev/sda did confirm that the drive was no longer in pristine shape.

It can also be useful for temporary files. Currently we suspect the > controller, but that's pure speculation and otherwise the machine is running > quitely. Keep in mind that the partition table is also in there. If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal (Applications->Accessories->Terminal).

I have not yet had any errors with the root partition on sdc1. It's essentially an anonymous disk file that will be removed as soon as you close its handle. I had an AMD Athlon 64 3700 @ 2.2GHz motherboard. 4 GB memory, running Debian 2.6.32 kernel. Marc Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote on 2010-06-14: #9 Marc, We see this often as a result of the integration of upstream stable patches.

Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ 2818.977023] EXT3-fs error (device md1): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ 2818.977025] Remounting filesystem read-only Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ mount shows: /dev/sda1 on /xxx type ext3 (rw,sync,relatime,errors=continue,data=ordered) On this partition /xxx some important binaries like kernel image and uboot etc resides. I copied the contents of the raid array to the new drive (cp -avx / /mnt). The old processor was single-core, non-hyperthreading.

Filesystem type mount options Mount options can be specific to the filesystem type, and their meaning may vary somewhat. In fact, I have as yet been unable to reproduce the error at all. As a result this bug is being closed. Quote Postby dm133 » 2009/01/02 17:29:30 dang.

with FUSE's userspace filesystems. And it worked. Somebody have a clue as to what is > going on here? Many Thanks, [email protected][email protected] Adv Reply October 11th, 2012 #2 2F4U View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message I Ubuntu, Therefore, I Am Join Date Jul 2011 Beans 3,037 DistroUbuntu 12.04

You can give priorities to individual swap devices (a number between 0 and 32k, higher is more), if you know something about their performance. Installing, Configuring, Troubleshooting server daemons such as Web and Mail Post Reply Print view Search Advanced search 3 posts • Page 1 of 1 dm133 Posts: 2 Joined: 2008/12/16 17:59:20 LVM2 To activate without a reboot, do something like swapon /dev/sda2, to deactivate (may take a while, and even fail) do swapoff /dev/sda2. I only know that the error again is with my Mozilla sources.

Please let us know your results. debugfs: ncheck 6031 Inode Pathname 6031 //testfilename -Eric > Markus Oehme > > PS: Please Cc me, since I'm not on the list. So the system reboot and before it reboot it doesn't tell why or anythign. over 300 views and no responses.

Hooked up to the motherboard were two sata drives (sda and sdb). EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,1)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #884828: directory entry across blocks - offset=0, inode=404600689, rec_len=23080, name_len=59 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,1)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #966714: rec_len % Thanks for your helpDustinps: I'm starting to wonder if this might be related to a kernel bug. The two will differ: when the file size is not exact multiple of the underlying lock size, the last allocated block will only be partially used.

volume management using LVM See LVM notes md: software RAID This article/section is a stub — probably a pile of half-sorted notes, is not well-checked so may have incorrect bits. (Feel I used lndir from my root fs to symlink everything and build it. Provide Feedback © Micro Focus Careers Legal close Feedback Print Full Simple Request a Call Follow Us Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter Subscription RSS [Date Prev][Date The other day the messages log started recording messages about "bad segments" on sda.

The symlink path may be relative or absolute. Problems continued. 5. Background.....-We have a server running Cent OS 4.7 kernel 2.6.9-78.0.5.ELsmp. -It has 6 300Gb SAS drives. -These drives are then cut into partitions that are added to mdadm software raid arrays. See also: http://techmonks.net/nofail-and-nobootwait-mount-options-in-fstab-prevent-boot-problems/ http://askubuntu.com/questions/120/how-do-i-avoid-the-s-to-skip-message-on-boot http://serverfault.com/questions/429219/whats-the-difference-between-mountall-and-mount-a-ubuntu-perhaps-others Other shared mount options atime This article/section is a stub — probably a pile of half-sorted notes, is not well-checked so may have incorrect bits. (Feel

I'd like to track and have them worked separately.