gcc error extra qualification member Viroqua Wisconsin

Address N2095 County Road F, La Crosse, WI 54601
Phone (608) 781-1700
Website Link http://hausertv.com
Hours

gcc error extra qualification member Viroqua, Wisconsin

How should I interpret "English is poor" review when I used a language check service before submission? That's all I can say from the information provided. Where are sudo's insults stored? Mar 7 '12 at 15:27 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote Such code can be compiled with -fpermissive. (GCC 4.9.2, not clang 3.6.0) I tested full program based on

Try removing JSONDeserializer:: share|improve this answer answered Apr 12 '11 at 22:29 joe_coolish 3,92553898 add a comment| up vote 10 down vote Are you putting this line inside the class declaration? With -w you do not get the warning, but maybe it is not always the best idea: you may want to get informed when something is strange. Now you are good to go! How does NumPy solve least squares for underdetermined systems?

Did I miss something? –cdmh Aug 3 '13 at 22:52 You missed the fact that I asked (twice) for evidence from the Standard and instead gave a fallacious a How to deal with sewage on a map with no water anywhere How should I calculate the determinant? I had a similar problem lately. share|improve this answer answered Mar 7 '12 at 15:05 Fred Foo 229k34431607 Yes your code is close to our code.

Why does argv include the program name? Flow Chart with tikzpicture: particular tipes of arrows Can I release a pattern without releasing the whole held expression? share|improve this answer answered Nov 20 '12 at 2:21 Lightness Races in Orbit 217k36337583 After checking every single one of my 32 files I found nothing the like, which In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations?

That's all I have to say I'm afraid. Can a GM prohibit a player from referencing spells in the handbook during combat? contact us Fourmilog: None Dare Call It Reason John Walker's Fourmilab Change Log « ETSET Version 3.2 Posted | Main | Reading List: Cryptonomicon » Sunday, May 21, 2006 GCC: "error: Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up error “extra qualification ‘student::’ on member ‘student’ [-fpermissive] ” up vote 8 down vote favorite I am getting an error extra qualification

Not the answer you're looking for? An answer might be "They follow from grammar". Bug26785 - "extra qualification" error gives line number of end of declaration Summary: "extra qualification" error gives line number of end of declaration Status: RESOLVED FIXED Alias: None Product: gcc Classification: For example: In myFile.h: class JSONDeserializer { Value ParseValue(TDR type, const json_string& valueString); }; And in myFile.cpp: Value JSONDeserializer::ParseValue(TDR type, const json_string& valueString) { do_something(type, valueString); } When myFile.cpp implements methods

You did not answer the question. linked by jrok provides it. Why (in universe) are blade runners called blade runners? How do I remove this error?

Make all the statements true Why was the identity of the Half-Blood Prince important to the story? I also get other errors that have no place at all and I get them with all the functions in the class. You may have to register or Login before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. c++ g++ compiler-errors share|improve this question edited Feb 27 '15 at 19:30 Ian R.

If you still believe your answer is not poor, make some arbitrary edit to it and that will allow me remove my down-vote. –Mike Kinghan Aug 4 '13 at 7:27 add Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up extra qualification error in C++ up vote 54 down vote favorite 4 I have a member function that is defined as follows: Reply With Quote April 2nd, 2009,12:17 PM #2 laserlight View Profile View Forum Posts Elite Member Power Poster Join Date Jan 2006 Location Singapore Posts 6,702 Re: gcc error: extra qualification View the code on Gist.

Unproven vs. more hot questions question feed lang-cpp about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation gcc 4.8.1 and clang 3.3 alike, with default diagnostic options or stricter, give errors for extra qualification or explicit qualification on code such as: struct x { int x::i; // Error: up vote 4 down vote favorite This similar ill-fated question got comments and short answers, before it was closed, to the effect: Because that's how the language is defined.

Why is absolute zero unattainable? Such qualifiers are designed to be used for redeclaration. more hot questions question feed lang-cpp about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation The linked old rant is randomly selected evidence that code which violates that a priori rationale was somehow written and compiled all the time until banned by the Standard.

of the atom whose 1s electron moves nearly at the speed of light? Forum New Posts FAQ Calendar Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Quick Links Today's Posts View Site Leaders What's New? Hence the requirement that these names must find previously declared entities. Comment 4 Manuel López-Ibáñez 2008-08-06 16:38:38 UTC Subject: Bug 26785 Author: manu Date: Wed Aug 6 16:37:06 2008 New Revision: 138816 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138816 Log: 2008-08-06 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez PR 26785 *

Implementation of a generic List Security Patch SUPEE-8788 - Possible Problems? Sorry for not posting this at the question. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed In that case you should remove the JSONDeserializer::.

Here I am asking for the evidence within the C++ Standard that it is so defined. There's no need since you're already in the class definition, and I don't think the C++ standard even allows this (I'm surprised older G++ did?). Instead, remove :: part. c++ gcc compiler-errors share|improve this question edited Nov 20 '12 at 10:10 Lightness Races in Orbit 217k36337583 asked Nov 20 '12 at 2:03 Carlos Jimenez Bermudez 194114 closed as too localized

How to handle a senior developer diva who seems unaware that his skills are obsolete? Presumably it checks things like that after reading a complete declaration. The includes seem fine as well. seen with: gcc version 4.1.0 20060219 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1-0exp9) gcc version 4.0.3 (Debian 4.0.3-1) [using -pedantic] Comment 1 Andrew Pinski 2006-03-21 17:05:28 UTC This is the crazy parser getting the line

Is there any job that can't be automated? How to deal with sewage on a map with no water anywhere Filter columns basing on the value of other column What actually are virtual particles? But popular compilers are not unanimous about these errors. How exactly does the typical shell "fork bomb" calls itself twice?

In that case, please try to show how they follow from the grammar and feel free to use the Standard's grammatical classifications. You cannot firstly declare a variable or member by using a qualified name - it will end up in a "cannot resolve identifier"-liky compiler error. But I know of no flag to suppress this behaviour. Related 3g++ compiler error with templated base class member9GCC compiler error when extracting a char from a temporary stream5G++ compiler error.

Not the answer you're looking for? Flow Chart with tikzpicture: particular tipes of arrows Can I release a pattern without releasing the whole held expression?