ext3-fs error ext3_new_block Fence Wisconsin

Address 1219 Carpenter Ave Ste B, Iron Mountain, MI 49801
Phone (906) 779-0583
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error ext3_new_block Fence, Wisconsin

Tested with different default centos kernels (kernel-2.6.18-92.el5, kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5), the same error. I updated the bios on the card to b5403 and was hoping it would solve the problem. This happens when the bitmap of that specific system zone block is corrupted (usually set as free). Differences I noticed didn't actually make any difference, so I'm out of ideas at the moment.

If anyone has any idea on what I could be doing wrong, please post a reply... Comment 48 grabben.kernel 2009-04-14 18:45:49 UTC Created attachment 20980 [details] lspci -nnvvvxxx lspci -nnvvvxxx Comment 49 Tejun Heo 2009-04-23 03:44:32 UTC Can you guys please post lspci -nnvvvxxx output after the Thanks in Advance Regards Ben jmozdzen26-Nov-2013, 12:35Hi Ben, Hi: I met some filesysterm errors in a sles guest on KVM. Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results.

Note that we *must* set > + * arguments in order of small address. > + */ > +static void ext4_defrag_lock_two(struct inode *first, struct inode *second) This function only gets called VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 11) 00:07.3 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. Last edited by tan_ce; 11-17-2008 at 06:40 AM. it would have been interesting to have the before and after outputs of "lspci -nnvvvxxx" so that which PCI config the previous BIOS screwed up.

I have tried dropping on of the drives out of the array (currently on the 3114 controller) and changing to an ext3 filesystem. Aaron, another user reported that the corruption occurred on the higher sectors for w/r 0x00 pattern testing. My system environment is: HOST: suse 10, the kernel version is 2.6.32.43 Qemu-KVM 1.2 Libvirt 1.0 guest OS: suse 10, the kernel version is 2.6.32.43 VMs use a qcow2 disk. Older nvidia and via seem to be affected. > Also, I can't find it again, but I think I read something about this bugtracker > not being for distribution kernels.

I'm kind of curious as to why the Dell NMI subsystem has a problem with the card. Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions Product(s) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Category Troubleshoot Tags ext3 rhel_5 rhel_6 Quick Links Downloads Subscriptions Support Cases Customer Service Product Documentation Help Contact Us Log-in Total LD size ~8TB). Total LD size ~8TB).

Therefore, nearly all of the time, it should be possible to move a contiguous range of blocks at a time from the donor to the source without increasing the number of The system is a P4 in a VIA chipset with a VT8233 southbridge, unknown northbridge (heatsink). How about some ssh mechanism, i.e. PCI host controller also seems to be a significant factor.

I can't reproduce the problem and not really sure what makes the freebsd driver avoid the problem. thx. I did an echo check > sync_action and checked mismatch_cnt at regular intervals - the mismatch count kept going up. Distribution - CentOS 5.2 Hardware used - IBM x3650 with ServerRAID10K raid controller and EXP3000 disk bay (12 SATA disks, RAID0.

Juris, you're not using sata_sil according to the posted log or lspci. You can try to format the flash disk and upgrade or else raise a TAC case and they can help you with it. The error appears to happen under heavy load, quite often when using multiple hard drives at once (I have two drives on the controller, and two onboard, utilizing a raidz (zfs) There's no point separating them into separate patches; the maximum message size through the vger mailing lists is something like 100k, and the two patches combined are under 43k.

Also, can you please try to determine whether the corruption occurs during read or write? kernel: ext3_abort called. regards, Ajay Kumar See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings) Log in or register to post comments Bilal Nawaz Tue, 04/30/2013 - 04:14 Hello Ajay, Thank Comment 64 Tejun Heo 2010-02-23 01:56:34 UTC Unfortunately, there currently is no known remedy for the problem.

Regards, Jens Right now running test on 2.6.28.2 with different FS flags, partition sizes and so on. I'm surprised no automatic fsck was run. (Please note that even "fsck" is not guaranteed to actually *fix* all errors in the FS! Description of problem: I have 20 VMs with qcow2 disk, these VMs have been forced to shut down by "virsh destroy" many times during VM installation.

Tested also with custom 2.6.28.2 kernel and different FS flags, no changes. Right now running test on 2.6.28 with different FS flags, partition sizes and so on. Total LD size ~8TB). I had to format flash:switch/Admin# backup all >> then I get a .tgz file and copy it to my PCswitch/Admin# format flash:switch/Admin#restore all disk0:.tgzThen I could copy the new software

Tested also with custom 2.6.28.2 kernel and different FS flags, no changes. I have tested forcing down 3 VMs many times(1000+) by "virsh destroy", but I can't reproduce the bugs. GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure Arghh...

Total : 201,954Today : 56 [BUG] Filesystem corruption: "ext3_new_block: Allocating block in system zone" OS/RedHat Bug Report 2014.04.24 16:28 | Filesystem corruption: "ext3_new_block: Allocating block in system zone" Issue: Filesystem corrupted secured by certificates? Log Out Select Your Language English español Deutsch italiano 한국어 français 日本語 português 中文 (中国) русский Customer Portal Products & Services Tools Security Community Infrastructure and Management Cloud Computing Storage JBoss I'm not sure I'm interpreting this correctly, but I think this is saying that there were indeed 0xff in the differing bytes.

Comment 16 Tejun Heo 2009-01-06 18:50:46 UTC Ah... Comment 63 Dan Rose 2010-02-20 09:19:31 UTC I too have this problem, I think.