ext2-fs error read block bitmap Elroy Wisconsin

Building

Address 106 W Carter St, Wonewoc, WI 53968
Phone (608) 464-5555
Website Link
Hours

ext2-fs error read block bitmap Elroy, Wisconsin

It fixed the partition so I could read it again. yes Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences: -(346115--346116) Fix? dd'ing the entire sdb would make things a bit more difficult but should have no real effect on the data. Laptop: ThinkPad W500, C2D P9500, 8GB, Radeon RV635 (HD3650), Arch | Server/fw: Zotac AQ01, A4-5000 Kabini, 4GB, Arch/pfSense VM Offline #6 2013-11-30 15:13:23 Spider.007 Member Registered: 2004-06-20 Posts: 1,153 Website Re:

Is it "eĉ ne" or "ne eĉ"? FIXED. So I am now uncompressing the bzip2 dd img I made earlier - as Spider.007 suggested - onto that drive and I will work on that image now.Any advices welcome. FIXED.

Also, are you sure the partition-table is now correct? you can follow below steps to recover superblocks. # dumpe2fs /dev/sdb2 | grep -i superblock Sample output : Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-6 Backup superblock at 32768, Group Where'd I put that spare hard disk? Fix?

Fix? Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption. Browse other questions tagged filesystem ext4 fsck or ask your own question. and who is general Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?

Not the answer you're looking for? yes Inode 3000636, i_blocks is 367695678, should be 0. Sense: Internal target failureend_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 781189162EXT3-fs error (device sdb1): read_inode_bitmap: Cannot read inode bitmap - block_group = 2980, inode_bitmap = 97648641Aborting journal on device sdb1.ext3_abort called.EXT3-fs error Already tried that.

yes Inode bitmap for group 268 is not in group. (block 1173679527) Relocate? See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings) Log in or register to post comments ActionsThis Discussion 0 Votes Follow Shortcut Abuse PDF     Trending Topics yes Group descriptor 4355 checksum is 0x0bc8, should be 0x4170. no effect.

I'd rather avoid a full installation followed by a restore which I've no experience at executing. yes Inode table for group 257 is not in group. (block 2199953455) WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE. Not the answer you're looking for? Block bitmap for group 258 is not in group. (block 3896597355) Relocate?

On sda1 then disk block 64 is partition block 0, and the message above means that sda1 block (want=)486539272 = disk block 486539336 - way beyond the end of the partition. yes Inode table for group 259 is not in group. (block 2924444292) WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE. Block bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 2553887680) Relocate? Events Experts Bureau Events Community Corner Awards & Recognition Behind the Scenes Feedback Forum Cisco Certifications Cisco Press Café Cisco On Demand Support & Downloads Login | Register Search form Search

Block bitmap for group 266 is not in group. (block 1840499818) Relocate? If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Inode table for group 273 is not in group. (block 281430039) WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE.

Laptop: ThinkPad W500, C2D P9500, 8GB, Radeon RV635 (HD3650), Arch | Server/fw: Zotac AQ01, A4-5000 Kabini, 4GB, Arch/pfSense VM Offline #10 2013-12-02 09:51:41 Lockheed Member Registered: 2010-03-16 Posts: 1,438 Re: [solved] It certainly may be, but I have seen this same symptom from flaky memory, that never gave any other symptom at first, except a screwy ext2 file system. well...there is no /dev/sda3 (i'm in the Live CD by the way) but [email protected]:/dev$ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = Relocate?

FIXED. EvenSt-ring C ode - g ol!f A better way to evaluate a certain determinant Is "halfly" a word? See "man e2fsck". yes Inode table for group 271 is not in group. (block 1108213120) WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE.

The "-p" (preen) option is safer. ext3 is backward compatible with ext2, so it should just ignore the journal that seems to be broken. Browse other questions tagged filesystems or ask your own question. FIXED.

Reply With Quote 08-05-2001,02:31 AM #3 posterboy View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Registered User Join Date Oct 2000 Location Lilburn, Ga. All rights reserved. At worst it'll take 3 days to get a new hard-drive delivered, so I'd like to find a 'without new hardware' solution for that. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 13:26 no Group descriptor 270 checksum is 0x1c78, should be 0x9f4e.

but whatever. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 23:07 Virtual host with 9 Windows and 1 Ubuntu. But I had not enough free space, so I had to save that image on the drive which had the original partition on it.I tried to check for locations of superblock:$ And gives the error "file2 kernel: journal commit I/O error".I went in to single-user mode and execute fsck -p /dev/sdb1 (please refer to screenshot attached for the output). yes Inode table for group 258 is not in group. (block 2609271215) WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE.

up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 A server of mine had a drive failure of some sort which caused the OS (CentOS 5) to crash and stop working (it refuses Game of Life, a shorter story Cyberpunk story: Black samurai, skateboarding courier, Mafia selling pizza and Sumerian goddess as a computer virus Is there a place in academia for someone who Here is how:1. As always, caution is advised. –Michael Hampton♦ Mar 28 '13 at 16:28 @GetFree, another way to mount a filesystem without touching its journal is to pass noload to mount,

CLEARED. Last edited by Lockheed (2013-12-19 17:27:12) Laptop: ThinkPad W500, C2D P9500, 8GB, Radeon RV635 (HD3650), Arch | Server/fw: Zotac AQ01, A4-5000 Kabini, 4GB, Arch/pfSense VM Offline #2 2013-11-30 14:38:31 Spider.007 Member What happened to Arch's KISS? I suspect your dumpe2fs /dev/sdb1 will report a "Block count: ..." larger that this.

The install program can see the partition, that it's ext4 and that it's the boot partition. Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view 10 posts • Page 1 of 1 Return I do have /etc and /home backed up, with few more odd files. If you care about this data; you should make a backup on an external medium (of the entire contents of /dev/sdb) before modifying anything.Try `dumpe2fs /dev/sdb1 | grep superblock` to find

Laptop: ThinkPad W500, C2D P9500, 8GB, Radeon RV635 (HD3650), Arch | Server/fw: Zotac AQ01, A4-5000 Kabini, 4GB, Arch/pfSense VM Offline #24 2013-12-19 17:24:15 Lockheed Member Registered: 2010-03-16 Posts: 1,438 Re: [solved] what I cut & pasted above. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 13:40 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote Finally found this link where so it happens sometimes –Anders Lind Mar 20 '13 at 15:14 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted Googling, I found none other Illegal block #5 (1571405617) in inode 3000670.