ext2-fs error ext2_check_page bad entry in directory Elcho Wisconsin

Address 209 E Elm St, Crandon, WI 54520
Phone (715) 478-1125
Website Link

ext2-fs error ext2_check_page bad entry in directory Elcho, Wisconsin

I'm somewhere between confused and concerned. :) Anything else weird in between mkfs & now? It is an ext4 volume, but it apparently let me mount it ext2(?), and I totally didn't catch it. Hence I would like to recover my data before I start a "write" behaviro on the disk. "fsck -y" is just a say "yes" to all... Something had to have changed...

well, this is worrisome. When I get to the undelete option it says: 1 * Linux 1 0 1 121599 254 63 1953487935 Directory / No file found, filesystem seems damaged. I was feeling nervous, too... Anyway, thanks again! --Doug Comment 21 Eric Sandeen 2011-03-15 11:55:19 EDT Are these problems still occurring or should this bug be closed at this point?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. this problem is so annoying :) –user16866 Aug 16 '09 at 0:20 now, i am getting these nonfatal errors on stderr. It seems like we weren't able to gather enough information to identify the problem. Of course, there's also driver problems to consider... –womble♦ Aug 18 '09 at 22:28 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote I surely think your disk contains bad sectors.

This was several weeks ago, so my recollection may be fuzzy. Or were there other mounts/copies/tune2fs's/unmounts in between? Is there a way to tell which directory is exactly having the problem? Please login or register.

tune4fs -c 0 -i 0 /dev/sdk1 Here's dumpe2fs: Filesystem volume name: data Last mounted on: Filesystem UUID: 4bc05c9f-8823-4eaa-a22e-ffab80e64a79 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: I don't have any older fsck logs, nor do I know exactly when this issue manifested. current community blog chat Server Fault Meta Server Fault your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

say if i do have bad blocks, why? The RAID card being used in this instance is a 3ware 9650SE-8LPML. See Linux Documentation/init.txt for guidance.CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.12.19-rt30-QorIQ-SDK-V1.7+g6619b8b #1Call Trace:[e7083e80] [c0006f50] show_stack+0x40/0x150 (unreliable)[e7083ec0] [c06a186c] dump_stack+0x78/0xa0[e7083ed0] [c069fbac] panic+0xd8/0x1fc[e7083f20] [c000295c] kernel_init+0x16c/0x170[e7083f40] [c000fe0c] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64Rebooting in 180 seconds..How can we also- whenever i try to make a new partition with the debian install CD it never lets me create an ext3 partition, fails by hanging for ever, i have to pull

thanks, -Eric Comment 20 Doug Kelly 2010-04-23 15:33:53 EDT Thanks again for your help troubleshooting this one! Comment 2 Eric Sandeen 2007-11-08 09:59:03 UTC You have on-disk corruption, e2fsck should clear it up. Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system? You're correct, the FS is roughly 11TB (as reported by df output).

try to use magiciso to burn iso file to cd. Why are so many metros underground? In any case, back to the original report, I'd say a check to make sure ext2 isn't trying to mount huge filesystems that it will fail with would be nice, but what does this mean :) and resize2fs (im sure it wont, becuase otherwise you probably wouldnt have said it, but) is it destructive?

At first I was afraid I'd be petrified What is a type system? How? I guess my question to you is, how should I proceed? I'm guessing thats the only thing that will truly clean this up, even if i could delete the bad folder?

If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. I do recall having issues with the RAID controller the drives were attached to, but it has since been fixed, and I don't see how it would cause something like this... Other than that, I don't have any recollection of it behaving strangely. Definitely considering just giving up instead of spending 3+ hours trying to run fsck.

there were other mounts/copies in between (and crashes), and I may have accidentally run e2fsck out of habit (instead of e4fsck). Invision Power Board © 2001-2016 Invision Power Services, Inc. swap_free: bad swap file entry 10000000 times about 12 all with different numbers... How can I recover my files before doing destructive actions with fsck?

Try running resize2fs /dev/hda1 from within a rescue environment (after a fsck -f, etc) and see if the filesystem size changes. Join our community today! will re-start my mkfs for testing w/ an older version :) Thanks, -Eric Comment 15 Doug Kelly 2010-04-23 13:52:58 EDT Crashes were actually RAID controller issues--imagine the entire volume just disappearing bodhi.zazenJune 18th, 2009, 10:29 PMThe blue pill or the red pill ?

ISO-burner is a really great tool to use. It wasn't well, e2fsck should have refused to touch it due to the incompatible features ... > run with -y (and I don't think I told it to make any changes), this is what prompted to get me a new drive last drive (which was actually corrupted but that is a different point) the fact of the matter is: the same error Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest

The system remained running no oopses or other messages in syslog, other than the 3ware kernel module telling me about the controller's issues, and if I reset the drives marked as I'm getting less worried about gathering data, since I am leaning towards blaming this on severe corruption from your raid card ... -Eric Comment 18 Doug Kelly 2010-04-23 14:50:17 EDT Okay, fs related? > I may have accidentally run e2fsck out of habit (instead of e4fsck). kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory #10158084: unaligned directory entry - offset=0, inode=605471640, rec_len=7606, name_len=177 rjo98 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View

Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] MOKB-12-11-2006 Bug details Title: Linux 2.6.x ext2_check_page fail! (network conenction reset) but the process ran to completeion... –user16866 Aug 17 '09 at 9:36 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in PDA View Full Version : [all variants] ext3 filesystem corrupt. is it the disk controller?

Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. If that fails we will need something such as testdisk or photorec HermanABJune 18th, 2009, 10:17 PMHmm, I would make a byte-wise copy of the disk first using 'dd' and try Also, you're totally right. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

Peer window 2191618559:2191622759. Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug585282 ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory / ext2_readdir: bad page after large copy Last modified: 2011-05-05 15:35:42 EDT Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports Thank you!-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 person found this helpfulLike • Show 0 Likes0 Actions Juan Rodrigo @ Yiping Wang on Sep 10, 2015 12:30 AMMark CorrectCorrect AnswerHi Yiping.Thank you for your answer. there's like a TB of data on there, so i'll have to schedule some long downtime to run the check.

ps thanks for the answer anyway –user16866 Aug 16 '09 at 12:01 a product (a disk for example) can basically suffer from two kinds of weakness: manufacturing errors and Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.