fortran internal compiler error segmentation fault Ragland West Virginia

Coalfield Computer Services is an organization dedicated to serving the technology needs of the coalfields of West Virginia and Kentucky since 1998.We are pioneers in the field. No other company is more qualified or certified to support you than Coalfield Computer Services.We can meet all your needs from web presence to PC repair, and from server maintenance to premise wiring. We appreciate the trust you place in us.

Address 570 Buck Br, Lovely, KY 41231
Phone (606) 395-6969
Website Link

fortran internal compiler error segmentation fault Ragland, West Virginia

Bug743026 - gfortran type extends causes internal compiler error Segmentation fault Summary: gfortran type extends causes internal compiler error Segmentation fault Status: CLOSED ERRATA Aliases: None Product: Fedora Classification: Fedora Component: I meant how did you try to compile your code. > "Have you thought about using a different OS?" > I currently run a Win 8 x64bit, I have no intentions make: *** [zpipe.o] Error 1 =========================================================================== Expected results: This is what I get when I compile under Intel's ifort: =============================================================================== brhazrts % make -f zpipe.o ifort -I./inc -D_LINX -D_UNIX -fpp Steve Lionel (Intel) Thu, 12/24/2015 - 13:33 There is no model_rates.f90 in the sources you linked to.

Story Points: --- Clone Of: Environment: Last Closed: 2014-10-14 01:01:45 EDT Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- CRM: Verified Versions: Category: --- oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements I am including an attachment, with the code and both the Makefile (which uses the GFORTRAN compiler) and (which uses ifort). The patch can be applied with the following command from the top-level source directory (e.g. /..../src/gcc-4.8.3/): patch -p0 < b1113793.patch Comment 6 Jakub Jelinek 2014-07-01 10:54:48 EDT I think it is The required padding should never overflow 2^32. 2005-03-13 Tobias Schl"uter PR fortran/20059 * trans-common.c (translate_common): Cast offset/common_segment->offset to type int for warning message.

Status: CLOSED ERRATA Aliases: None Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Classification: Red Hat Component: gcc (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Version: 6.5 Hardware: i386 Linux Priority unspecified Severity medium Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. As I recall, even if you do manage to persuade the code to compile, the c_funloc function (which is essential for passing callback routines) does not work. Syntax error here write(advance='no') ' ' end program main with gcc-4.4 on Ubuntu 9.10 using the following command gfortran main.f90 , I get a segmentation fault.

Comment 3 Fritz Reese 2014-06-27 14:46:35 EDT Created attachment 912913 [details] Simplified test case exhibiting seg-fault This is an explicit test case which causes the segmentation fault in gfortran as described I am running on a computer with 256gb memory (although I can increase this if needed), so that shouldn't be a problem.  Has anyone got any suggestions on what I could try Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] | Comment 11 Andrew Pinski 2005-05-04 19:31:23 UTC *** Bug 21384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home

Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal Red Hat Fri, 12/25/2015 - 04:22 sorry, corrected to the original file. Reload to refresh your session. If old-style initializations should be parsed and resolved like standard initializations, the feature should probably be enabled only as a GNU extension.

Top Steve Lionel (Intel) Fri, 12/25/2015 - 12:02 Thanks for the reproducer. Steve - Intel Developer Support Top Steve Lionel (Intel) Thu, 01/14/2016 - 09:14 I expect the fix for this to be in Update 2, planned for early February. Here's a quick view of the compile line: % gfortran -I./inc -g -fcray-pointer -ffixed-line-length-132 -fdollar-ok -funderscoring -D_LINX -D_UNIX -fPIC -fpack-derived -ffixed-line-length-132 -finit-local-zero -c zpipe.f zpipe.f:28: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results.

Yahoo! Patches: Comment 10 Tobias Schlüter 2005-04-24 14:01:30 UTC Fixed, sorry for the delay. This way I can temporarily bypass this problem with gfortran. Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results.

Subscribing... Can you tell us how to reproduce the error? this tries to compile zpipe.c to a .o 3.... See for instructions.

You signed out in another tab or window. Description Dale Ranta 2005-02-18 16:26:56 UTC I get an Segmentation Fault with the Macintosh gfortran from the 20050213 package for this program. [dranta:~/tests/gfortran] dir% gfortran -c plotz.f [address=6f6c0004 pc=000140d0] plotz.f: In Thu, 12/24/2015 - 13:53 Hi Steve,  Yes I am using the 64 bit compiler.  As for updating this, I have submitted a request to the sys admin, although it may take Comment 6 Andrew Pinski 2005-04-11 00:38:10 UTC *** Bug 19387 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 7 Andrew Pinski 2005-04-20 15:08:49 UTC *** Bug 21125 has

Here is an alternative (so far untested) patch: 2014-07-01 Jakub Jelinek Fritz Reese * decl.c (variable_decl): Reject old style initialization for derived type components. * gfortran.dg/oldstyle_5.f: New test. --- Comment 2 Tobias Schlüter 2005-03-12 23:57:37 UTC Does this still segfault on powerpc? GCC Bugzilla – Bug20059 internal compiler error: Segmentation Fault - For common blocks Last modified: 2005-05-04 19:31:23 UTC Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help make: *** [zpipe.o] Error 1 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I tried this out on two GFORTRAN compilers: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) (A redhat 6

make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/gtk-fortran_shared.dir/gtk.f90.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/gtk-fortran_shared.dir/gtk.f90.o.provides] Error 2 make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/gtk-fortran_shared.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 gcc -v Using built-in specs. Comment 5 Fritz Reese 2014-06-27 15:30:17 EDT Created attachment 912938 [details] Quick fix to avoid seg-faulting in this case This is a simple patch for gfortran v4.8.3 (and likely other versions) This is incorrectly positioned - it should be immediately after the SUBROUTINE line. I only have 1 accessible computer.

zpipe.f is the offending program, but the problem *probably* happens down in the inc/ Type: make zpipe.o # to see the seg fault or make -f # to see what Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.4 --program-suffix=-4.4 --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-targets=all --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i486 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu Moreover, if you replace CALL SUB1 by CALL SUB1("") the segfault goes away. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat 4.6.1-9) How reproducible: Only seems to happen with a module procedure that extends the derived type inside

In Update_RCONST there is a "USE constants" after the assignment to R02. But yes this fixes the problem. Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. RSS Top 11 posts / 0 new Last post For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.

Perhaps this will allow you to continue. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time.