gcc error redefinition of typedef Waldron Washington

Blacksheep Technology takes care of the computer stuff for small to medium size offices. We serve Seattle, North and South King, Kent, Tacoma, Olympia & Eatonville. In fact we service and all cities in Snohomish, Pierce and King County. Our clients include many Washington Businesses and Municipalities! We're certain you'll find we're different from anyone you've ever worked with: Flat rates, everything included. Instead of charging you by the hour, we offer all-inclusive flat rate pricing. This includes the hardware, software and installation time. And yes, our prices even include the tax. We come to you. We'll come to your office with everything we need and put it all together for you. That includes the hardware, software, peripherals and even the computers. We won't leave you twisting in the wind - we won't leave until it works. We're technology neutral. We represent you, not the computer hardware manufacturers and software developers. Think about it. Since we're not in the back pocket of these companies, you get the technology you need instead of the product they are currently pushing through their sales channels. Contrary to what you are being told, what we do isn't rocket science. Our competitors hate it when we say that; hence, the name Blacksheep. Chips, bits and bytes don't have to be confusing. Instead of trying to impress you with the latest techno-babble, we'll pull back the Wizard's curtain and de-mystify computing for you. Our competitor's hate it when we do that. Our customers love it. We could give you a big old list of credentials and a bunch of fancy abbreviations and acronyms. That's just not us or our style.

Other Blacksheep Services Internet Protect: Protects against that fourteen year-old across the globe that has nothing better to do than to hack into your system. Your choice of two different attitudes and two pieces of technology with the first choice just keeping them out and the second a little more. Share: Our residential gateway router package lets you share one DSL line throughout multiple machines while protecting your network from the big, bad Internet. Share Plus: Blacksheep Share Plus is our firewall router proxy virtual private network product. How's that for a mouthful? This product is just like Blacksheep Share Plus gives you administrative control over your network. You can control traffic entrances and exits on your network and remotely dial into your network through a secure VPN connection. Connect: Network your entire office with Blacksheep Connect. Put an end to floppy-swapping, let your computers communicate and share files, printers-even an Internet connection. Wireless: With Blacksheep Wireless there's no fuss, no cables, just a wireless workplace. We'll connect up to 125 machines to your network, without wires. And when you move, it moves. Back-up: How much is your data worth? Blacksheep Backup includes several solutions that can be tailored to the way you do business. Arrangements can be made for Blacksheep to pick up your media. Data Retrieval

Address Seattle, WA 98177
Phone (206) 957-0886
Website Link http://www.blacksheeptechnology.com/
Hours

gcc error redefinition of typedef Waldron, Washington

cocoa xcode cocoa xcode Making GCC less sensitive about duplicate typedefs? Browse other questions tagged c gcc struct typedef or ask your own question. Why doesn't ${@:-1} return the last element of [email protected]? Most annoying abuses are: 1) Top posting 2) Thread hijacking 3) HTML/MIME encoded mail 4) Improper quoting 5) Improper trimming _______________________________________________ You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:

share|improve this answer answered Dec 3 '11 at 12:43 Jan Henke 7951822 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote As others have already stated, you cannot redefine types in C. The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. And even if it were, I'm not in the mood for re-writing thousands of lines of code. -- Mark Wagner Xcode - June 20, 2006 june 2006 MTWTFSS Are you sure you aren't importing the same header twice without header guards? –Kevin Ballard Mar 13 '12 at 0:09 1 This code compiles fine.

Bug767538 - Compilation error when defining the same type twice with typedef Summary: Compilation error when defining the same type twice with typedef Status: CLOSED NOTABUG Aliases: None Product: Red Hat Possible approaches to try: (1) You may be able to get around this issue by removing the first occurrence of the typedef, and then moving the second "real" typedef to the Using nim cpp also makes the problem go away, but the C++ code generator may not be an option in practice. 2015-11-25 11:38:50 Jehan Some more information: the underlying problem lies If you use Byte, though, the > compiler will probably complain that it needs a namespace qualifier.

It > complains that you are redefining a variable, which I think is the > right response. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds ----------- My wife 'n kids 'n dogs are gone, I can't get Jesus on the phone, But Ol' Milwaukee's Best share|improve this answer edited Mar 13 '12 at 0:17 answered Mar 13 '12 at 0:07 Ed S. 86.6k13131199 Fixed, forgot to include them when copying code by hand. –Bort The third-party headers change about once in a blue moon, but the person who wrote them was in love with macros: the actual typedefs are about a half-dozen macro calls deep,

I'm using gcc 3.3, gcc 4.0, and gcc 3.4.2 for Windows, all of which give the error. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. asked 5 years ago viewed 2851 times active 5 years ago Linked 7 compiling source code on 2 different versions of gcc Related 1C++ class redefinition error help1644Why doesn't GCC optimize You can spread it across multiple header files just have to make sure that there is some B seen before struct _A is defined.

Is there any solution for this? How do I get this > sort of thing to compile with gcc? > > typedef char dummy; > typedef char dummy; > > int main() > { > return 0; typedef char dummy; typedef char dummy; int main() { return 0; } Thanks, Mark Wagner Justin C. However, this is not how they have been historically implemented.

On 10.4.6, with Xcode > 2.3 installed, both gcc 3.3 and gcc 4.0 do not give this error. I believe this code is accepted in recent GCCs. Even better, use clang or a more recent version of gcc (gcc 4.5 has the bug, gcc 4.7 doesn't have it, and I'm not sure about 4.6). They will be ignored. > Xcode-users mailing list () > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/devlists% > 402point5fish.com > > This email sent to > Steve Checkoway Re: Making

Compute the kangaroo sequence Is there any way to know when NOT to use my Oyster card? It could be that the other way around fools something in the compiler. Comment 4 Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-14 10:47:13 EST The C specification is a source of never-ending learning to me. :-) So it looks like the part of the C99 specification that forbids Can I release a pattern without releasing the whole held expression?

I did not install them, but I want to figure out what going on before asking our cluster administrator to look into this. 2015-11-24 22:34:04 Araq That is a known regression You signed in with another tab or window. I will keep you updated. The system headers don't include these related types. > > Oh yes, and it turns out that "Byte" is typedef'd in at least three > different sets of third-party headers. >

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. I am able to succesfully compile the same using Win32 and RVCT22 compilers. The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year.

Flow Chart with tikzpicture: particular tipes of arrows Is the NHS wrong about passwords? Just fix up your sources. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. Is it a bug in > MinGW ?

Jun 20 2006, 03:57 On Jun 19, 2006, at 16:17 , Mark Wagner wrote: > The following C code compiles just fine in CodeWarrior, but gcc gives > an error of But I see the semi-colons. –DanRedux Mar 13 '12 at 0:09 @Bort: Well it compiles for me. –Ed S. Thanks a lot for the input, next time I'll do more homework before opening a bug. With modern technology, is it possible to permanently stay in sunlight, without going into space?

share|improve this answer answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:14 Matthew Slattery 28.7k26285 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Why doesn't ${@:-1} return the last element of [email protected]? i.e.: struct B_ { int c; }; typedef struct B_ B; That way you are saying: "here is B_ and now I want to refer to it as B".

Login Username: Password: Reset password Register Login Documentation Stable Documentation Github Issues & Requests Community User Forum Online IRC IRC Logs Written in Nim - Powered by Jester Web Design by You will have to use typedef otherwise you cannot use A & B as you have in the code –another.anon.coward Dec 3 '11 at 13:01 Updated to use C Join us from November 9-12, 2009. How to deal with sewage on a map with no water anywhere How should I calculate the determinant?

It >>>> complains that you are redefining a variable, which I think is the >>>> right response. >>> >>> I'm using gcc 3.3, gcc 4.0, and gcc 3.4.2 for Windows, all India has a new look. The actual situation is a bit more complicated: there are about a dozen types (UInt8 and similar) that are being defined in both a system header and a third-party header, with Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal home learn

However, though you will likely be able to make minor modifications to the header to enable it to work with your 4.4.4 version of GCC, at this time we will not