fortran error there is no specific subroutine for the generic Quincy Washington

Address 9505 Vernal Ave SE, Moses Lake, WA 98837
Phone (509) 750-0233
Website Link
Hours

fortran error there is no specific subroutine for the generic Quincy, Washington

This example shows you how to automatically determine the correct data type for a given REAL. call cufftPlanMany(plan, 1, size,& 0, 1, size,& 0, 1, size,& CUFFT_C2C, batch) Unfortunately trying to compile this results in Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'cufftplanmany' at (1) Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up no specific function for generic up vote 1 down vote favorite Have created an interface for the following functions Interface numd Module How should I interpret "English is poor" review when I used a language check service before submission?

Powered by vBulletin Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2016 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. You declare an interface for DFPMIN in module if3, but also declare a procedure DFPMIN in module dkd, which is also visible to the caller. Try building the HDF5 library with FCFLAGS =-fdefault-real-8. > > You might also want to look at the example h5ex_d_rdwr_kind_F03.f90 at https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/examples/api18-fortran.html, which uses the newer F2003 APIs. Browse other questions tagged generics fortran or ask your own question.

Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] | Why do you declare n, inembed, onembed as arrays, when they should be int*, eg. Browse other questions tagged fortran gfortran or ask your own question. Bug40276 - Matching GENERIC procedure: Wrong INTENT should give directly an error message Summary: Matching GENERIC procedure: Wrong INTENT should give directly an error message Status: NEW Alias: None Product: gcc

Will CALL ice(23.0) ! { dg-error "no specific subroutine" } 1 Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'ice' at (1) for gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90 do it for you? PR fortran/24866 * parse.c (gfc_fixup_sibling_symbols): Do not modify the symbol if it is a dummy in the contained namespace. 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/28885 * gfortran.dg/aliasing_dummy_2.f90: New test. Largest number of eɪ sounds in a word EvenSt-ring C ode - g ol!f more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here PR fortran/24866 * gfortran.dg/module_proc_external_dummy.f90: New test.

Also, are sure that you can interchange int and size_t? The time now is 04:05 PM. Trying to use variables in place of constants didn't help either. Try building the HDF5 library with FCFLAGS =-fdefault-real-8.

What should I use for MPI_STATUS_IGNORE in case of array_of_requests — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: Ensure that symbol reference is refreshed, in case the search produces a NULL. it only works by removing the compiler flag -fdefault-real-8 in my makefile FC =h5fc FCFLAGGS = -fdefault-real-8 -g -Wall -llapack | 21 FFLAGGS += -I/usr/include it has something to do with a bullet shot into a suspended block Any better way to determine source of light by analyzing the electromagnectic spectrum of the light Why does argv include the program name?

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed How do I explain that this is a terrible idea? Scot > On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:06 AM, chinchi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have on problem by compiling hdf5 with fortran90. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aliasing_dummy_2.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_6.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/invalid_interface_assignment.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/module_proc_external_dummy.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/redefined_intrinsic_assignment.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/parse.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90 Comment 6 Paul Thomas 2006-08-30 05:31:25 UTC Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul Format For Printing -XML

Why does argv include the program name? However, if one calls a GENERIC procedure the error message is just: Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'gen' at (1) The issue is: There is already a Function numcl_int8 (t, mold) Result (b) Integer (Int8) :: b Class (*), Intent (In) :: t Integer (Int8), Intent (InOut) :: mold End Function numcl_int8 I am getting error There is How do I explain that this is a terrible idea?

https://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/v1.10/ jsquyres added the question label May 24, 2016 Open MPI member jsquyres commented May 24, 2016 I am not a Fortran expert: does your declaration of requests match what is PR fortran/28873 * gfortran.dg/generic_6.f90: New test. The issue does not occur yet, as the feature is not yet implemented. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

If you have a focus for your spell casting do you need to pay materials? How do investigators always know the logged flight time of the pilots? I'm wondering why call isub(ai(2)) is accepted, though... Is there any reason it should not find the appropriate type?

Here is simple exemple: module foo interface sub module procedure isub module procedure dsub end interface contains subroutine isub(a,n) integer, intent(in) :: a(*), n integer :: i print*, 'isub' do i=1,n It doesn't want to compile when I'm doing this with gfortran 4.7.2 on Mac OS X 10.8.4 and with gfortran 4.8.1 on Arch Linux x64. Truth in numbers Are independent variables really independent? Top milenko1976 Fri, 01/06/2012 - 06:38 I have now finished the whole code,compiled all suboutines but still have problem in main [email protected]:~/primeri/b1$ ifort -O2 -g -heap-arrays -traceback -check all -c cons.f90

I am worried that size_t might be 64 bit and int 32 bit in gcc on your system. The problem is the native double in HDF5 does not match the native double in your program because you promoted real to double precision in your program but not in the Removing elements from an array that are in another array Make all the statements true How to handle a senior developer diva who seems unaware that his skills are obsolete? Related 2Writing and calling pure subroutines in Fortran 90 using gfortran2How to debug Fortran 90 compile error “There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'foo' at (1)”?0How to use loadlibrary

Physically locating the server How did the Romans wish good birthday? e. "dummy arguments do not conform to the actual arguments in your call", that's why the compiler tried to find some other subroutine in the interface which would conform and it The bindings itself look like this: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! Try call sub(ai(2:2)) which is passing an array of length one.

Can Communism become a stable economic strategy? PR fortran/20067 * gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90: Change error message. Reply With Quote 12-22-2010,02:35 AM #3 Samba View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Junior Member Join Date Dec 2010 Posts 2 error #6285: There is no matching specific subroutine for Not a member?

share|improve this answer answered May 20 at 3:18 IanH 14k11427 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up I think you're making things too hard by creating all these tiny modules. You might also want to look at the example h5ex_d_rdwr_kind_F03.f90 at https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/examples/api18-fortran.html, which uses the newer F2003 APIs. You need to register before you can post, click the register link to proceed.

We’ve change the behavior in v1.10.0 release so that we create an interface for all valid KINDs of both REALs and INTEGERs. please confirm!) vondele commented May 25, 2016 I see, so yes, I would say that the interface provided by OMPI in 'use mpi' doesn't match the subroutine MPI_WAITALL provided above, i.e. a bullet shot into a suspended block Is there a place in academia for someone who compulsively solves every problem on their own? interface loct_minimize function oct_minimize(method, dim, x, step, tolgrad, toldr, maxiter, f, & write_iter_info, minimum) integer :: oct_minimize integer, intent(in) :: method integer, intent(in) :: dim real(8), intent(inout) :: x real(8), intent(in)

PR fortran/25102 * gfortran.dg/invalid_interface_assignment.f90: New test. But func and dfunc have problems as well.