error* unclaimed register before interrupt Ardenvoir Washington

Specializing in all aspects of computer service and repair, including setup, virus removal, computer security, cyber security, email, networking, servers, printers, desktops, laptops, PC & Mac. Serving the Wenatchee valley since 2003. Conveniently located in Wenatchee on the corner of Whitman Way and Mission Street. Onsite service is also available.

Web Servers|Desktop Printers|Servers|Monitors|Virtual Private Networks|Software|Maintenance Kits|Switches|Laser Printers|Multimedia|Routers|Cables & Wires|Printers|Desktop Computers|Bridges|CPUs|Mice|Scanners|Disk Drives|Sound Cards|Hard Drives|Keyboards|Used Hardware|Laptops|Computer Software|Memory|Fax Machines|Storage Devices|Networking|Hubs & Switches|Mainframes|Local Area Networks|Firewalls|Network Equipment|PDAs|Wireless Networks|Voice Over Internet Protocol Systems|Used Equipment|CD-ROM Drives|ISDN|Modems|Wide Area Networks|Video Cards|Patch Panels|OEM Parts|CD & DVD Burners|Motherboards|Parts & Supplies|DVD Drives|Spyware Removal Software|Virus Removal|Training|Set-Up|Systems Analysis & Design|Pick-Up Services|Malware Removal|Consultations|Spyware Removal|Technical Support|Computer Security|Ransomware Removal|On-Site Services|Set-Up|Computer Security|Technical Support|On-Site Services|Computer Security|Custom Software Solutions|Coupons|Spyware Removal|Testing|Estimates|Training|Trojan Virus Removal|Hardware Upgrades|Software Upgrades|Maintenance & Repair|Computer Forensics|Remote Data Protection|Information Security|Network Security|Maintenance & Repair|Project Management|Encryption|Electronics Recycling|Computer Recycling|Trade-Ins|Toner Cartridge Recycling

Address 211 N Whitman Way Ste B, Wenatchee, WA 98801
Phone (509) 293-9141
Website Link https://www.facebook.com/GeekWerks
Hours

error* unclaimed register before interrupt Ardenvoir, Washington

Support queries should be addressed to them first. In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #58897, Chris Wilson (ickle) wrote on 2013-08-09: #23 3.8.0-27 is Ubuntu's kernel, almost 9 months behind the curve. None, the status of the bug is updated manually. Verified here.

Display fifo underflow. Can a Legendary monster ignore a diviner's Portent and choose to pass the save anyway? the screen resurrect at wake up, although I also have to reload gnome-shell). I tested with -next-queued top commit: 209d52110a32c2069b5d870504e73fdb0e30fc51, and applied the patches.

Thank you! Ok, so it's really i915 to blame for this. > Oh, I forgot to mention, that before the Call Trace, I get theses: > > > [ 673.093330] [drm:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed This seems to be fixable only by rebooting.Those errors show up in dmesg just after booting the computer :[lun. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch Previous message: [Intel-gfx] [WARNING 4.1-rc2] i915: Unclaimed register detected before writing to register 0xc4040 Next message: [PATCH] drm/msm: adreno a306 support

I'm decreasing severity as I don't see real bad impact to users. SSDT SSDT SSDT MCFG HPET SSDT > SSDT SSDT DMAR > acpi0: wakeup devices PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) > RP03(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) RLAN(S4) PXSX(S4) RP05(S4) PXSX(S4) RP06(S4) > PXSX(S4) RP07(S4) What is the most expensive item I could buy with £50? Ask Ubuntu works best with JavaScript enabled [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [vfio-users] i915 vgaarb patch not work as expect, always get

printk+0x55/0x6b [ 1.486029] [] do_fbcon_takeover+0x5b/0xc0 [ 1.486031] [] fbcon_event_notify+0x6e5/0x7e0 [ 1.486033] [] notifier_call_chain+0x4f/0x80 [ 1.486035] [] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0x70 [ 1.486037] [] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 1.486039] [] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [ 1.486041] [] register_framebuffer+0x21a/0x380 [ 1.486043] Am 12/08/15 um 10:48 schrieb Stefan Wollny: > HI there, > > is this issue known or should I file a bug report? > > Best, > STEFAN > > > Is there a role with more responsibility? SSDT SSDT SSDT MCFG HPET SSDT SSDT SSDT DMAR acpi0: wakeup devices PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP03(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) RLAN(S4) PXSX(S4) RP05(S4) PXSX(S4) RP06(S4) PXSX(S4) RP07(S4) PXSX(S4) [...] acpitimer0 at

If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why would he work at a glorified boarding school? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the printk+0x55/0x6b [ 1.484964] [] do_fbcon_takeover+0x5b/0xc0 [ 1.484966] [] fbcon_event_notify+0x6e5/0x7e0 [ 1.484968] [] notifier_call_chain+0x4f/0x80 [ 1.484970] [] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0x70 [ 1.484973] [] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 1.484974] [] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [ 1.484976] [] register_framebuffer+0x21a/0x380 [ 1.484978] Some of these are erroneous, for example indicative of untidy bios.

While waking up from sleep I get the following error on a black screen drm: hsw_uncalimed_reg_clear Error unknown claimed register before writing to c7204 drm: hsw_unclaimed_reg_check I sshed into my system Any better way to determine source of light by analyzing the electromagnectic spectrum of the light Different Rectangle Types of nodes Is it possible to have a planet unsuitable for agriculture? But in general I though we've curbed most of them ... Can There Only be One Context User per Transaction?

kthread_worker_fn+0x170/0x170 [ 1.485010] [] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 [ 1.485012] [] ? Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report linux (Ubuntu) Edit Fix Released Low Timo Aaltonen Edit You need to log in to change this The detailed solution is available at http://askubuntu.com/a/534567 share|improve this answer answered Jul 11 '15 at 12:01 Ras_al_Ghul 1 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or USB3.0 Hub" rev 3.00/90.91 addr 9 umass2 at uhub5 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S" rev 3.00/0.01 addr 10 umass2: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus4 at umass2:

Any other info required to investigate? This bug is basically a tracker bug for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/58897 first round of patches is here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-February/thread.html#24866 ..but instead of backporting those it makes more sense to just silence the error messages, avril 20 09:15:53 2015] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrunThose show up every few minutes or so :[lun. Best, STEFAN Am 12/16/15 um 00:44 schrieb Stefan Wollny: > ping? > > Am 12/08/15 um 10:48 schrieb Stefan Wollny: >> HI there, >> >> is this issue known or should

Tag changed. This information was last pulled on 2016-10-09. avril 20 13:15:04 2015] [drm:intel_uncore_check_errors [i915]] *ERROR* Unclaimed register before interrupt [lun. What is that the specific meaning of "Everyone, but everyone, will be there."?

Topics: Active | Unanswered Index ┬╗Kernel & Hardware ┬╗DRM Intel i915 errors Pages: 1 #1 2015-04-20 16:14:23 gentledevil Member Registered: 2014-09-17 Posts: 3 DRM Intel i915 errors Hi,After going out of Affecting: linux (Ubuntu) Filed here by: James M. Changed in linux (Ubuntu Raring): status: Confirmed → Won't Fix See full activity log To post a comment you must log in. In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #58897, Paulo Zanoni (pzanoni) wrote on 2013-01-31: #15 (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Daniel's patch certainly fixes the problem for

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed I may just keep > > adding a patch to hide that warning. process_one_work+0x470/0x470 [ 1.485006] [] kthread+0xd8/0xf0 [ 1.485009] [] ? avril 20 12:35:30 2015] [drm:intel_uncore_check_errors [i915]] *ERROR* Unclaimed register before interruptAlso, searching the kernel bug tracker for the error above leads to the the following report that may be related https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90951

I'll just block out > > > compiling in SND_HDA_INTEL, so that it doesn't break my tests (they > > > fail on a WARNING). > > > > Hmm, right Has some gfx performance impact though. USB2.0 Hub" rev 2.10/90.90 addr 2 > uhub4 at uhub0 port 6 "Genesys Logic USB2.0 Hub" rev 2.00/9.01 addr 3 > uhidev0 at uhub4 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Logitech