general error managed-keys.bind.jnl open permission denied West Augusta Virginia

Address 154 Homes Ln, Staunton, VA 24401
Phone (540) 887-8482
Website Link

general error managed-keys.bind.jnl open permission denied West Augusta, Virginia

Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. rudisoft, Jul 31, 2010 #31 foxnet New Member Solve problem in DNS on ISPConfig 3 I solve this problem with a little different way.... Running /etc/init.d/named restart does restart my DNS server with no errors, BUT I have not created any clients, web sites, email, or DNS Zones that's going to be next. So even though I added the domain for "" I had not yet added an "A" record for the server "prl-ofc-s01" so 'things' didn't work properly.

Tango Icons Tango Desktop Project. Originally it looks include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones";Click to expand... Hope this helps someone! I couldn't reproduce the problem directly on Precise because on package removal /var/cache/bind/managed-keys.bind is left behind and so /var/cache/bind never gets removed (I think this is a separate bug in itself).

What do I do when two squares are equally valid? So the Precise postinst script does not do the chmod. I'd like to understand the root cause before I'm comfortable pushing to change this, and there is a trivial workaround for those affected. By "high" frequency, I mean greater than or equal to 25 hertz, with a proportional effect between 0 and 25 hertz.

This tip ist very fat ****! I threw in a echo line in /etc/init.d/named to show the value of $named_conf that was being loaded, and it was /etc/named.conf.Any idea what is wrong here?/var/log/messagesJan 30 22:14:11 NS1 named[24485]: If the Lucid package was installed, then removed, then installed again, the following happens: 1. Dig testing was perfect.Bottom line: do not select the chroot option at OS install if you do want to use it.

Join our community today! the second install would create /var/cache/bind again with (possibly) the wrong permissions, and the postinst script would not fix it. no? Processing triggers for man-db ...

If not, add it to your options section. MzaNike, Jul 14, 2011 #3 christiant123 Bit Poster Messages: 1 IgorG said: ↑ Just create empty this file. System specs would be nice. Note: It is true that changes made by ISPConfig take some time, so please be patiend, wait for a few minutes until veryfing.

but I don't have "/etc/bind" path in my server. Stay logged in Odin Forum Home Forum > More Products Discussion > Older Panel Software Versions > Plesk 9.x for Windows > Plesk 9.x for Windows Suggestions and Feedback > Home sudo apt-get remove bind9 # this removes /var/cache/bind but leaves /etc/bind9/rndc.key 3. Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: client signer "" approved Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: client updating zone '': adding an RR at 'client$ Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: /etc/bind/zones/ To switch on DNSSEC validation at the # root, the root key below can be copied into named.conf. # # The built-in DLV trust anchor in this file is used directly Not using this feature is a security risk, workers of Parallels should know and give better infos! the removal would delete /var/cache/bind as it is not a conffile, but not /etc/bind/rndc.key 3.

the last one), they were a great starting point in solving my problem! The file "managed-keys.bind" is used for managing keys in DNSSEC. Adv Reply May 3rd, 2012 #8 jrtboht View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date May 2010 Beans 42 Re: Server load higher on 12.04 We have cookies! | Basic Ubuntu Security Guide Tomorrow's an illusion and yesterday's a dream, today is a solution...

I've managed to reproduce this now, with the following steps: On Lucid: 1. You may not have received reports because bind actually works, just uses high CPU. drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Dec 3 20:54 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 bind bind 698 Dec 4 21:00 managed-keys.bind -rw-r--r-- 1 bind bind 512 Dec 4 21:00 managed-keys.bind.jnl [email protected]:~# rm -rf /var/cache/bind The above would happen (AFAICT) if *ANY* version ever released of the Lucid bind9.deb had broken permissions, as subsequent upgrades would not fix it.

This came to light after a ran the commands: Code: cd /var/named named-checkzone /var/named - location of the zone files - name of the domain to check As of the current release (BIND # 9.7), the only trust anchor it sets is the one for the ISC DNSSEC # Lookaside Validation zone (""). Find all posts by William Haller #3 15th July 2011, 02:06 PM AIM Systems Offline Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Guelph (pronounced Gwe-ELF), Ontario , Canada What I have changed is: In /etc/named.conf: Changed the 'listen-on' option to include my servers LAN IP listen-on port 53 {;; }; Changed the 'allow-query' option to include my

It seems likely to me that this issue will affect Debian also, so next I will test this and file a bug report in Debian as needed, so that we can To test everything at once, configure your desktop to use your newly DNSSec-aware resolver and browse to Thanks in advance rbroomfield, Jul 10, 2010 #26 MrCompTech New Member Hi rbroomfield, I ran the updatedb and locate named.conf on my system and the output from the locate command description: updated summary: - bind9 uses high CPU after lucid->precise upgrade+ Maintainer scripts mishandle /var/cache/bind permissions Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2012-12-06 Changed in bind9 (Debian): status: Unknown → New Alex

rudisoft said: ↑ Hello everyone, Using the same setup (The Perfect Server - Fedora 13 x86_64 [ISPConfig 3]) on 2 different servers (local and production), i had exaclty the same problem. Someone who can forge DNS entries in your server can use that to leverage his way further into your systems. Marking as Incomplete for now. Next I am going to start adding a client and see what happens with the DNS I'll but that in my next post.

Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Board index The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ] Powered by phpBB Forum Software © phpBB Group FAQ Forum Quick apt-get remove bind9 4. The 100% CPU usage problem is already in bug 1038199, so we can track that there.

I'm not sure why it's using that much CPU, does it stay that high after you restart it? Is there any reason why the bind cache directory should ever not be writeable by the group that owns it? Adv Reply Page 1 of 3 123 Last Jump to page: Quick Navigation Server Platforms Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Google™ Search FedoraForum Search Red Hat Bugzilla Search
Search Forums Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Search Go to Page...

How? DNS tab --> selected zone "" Clicked on the "Records" tab Since I used the DNS wizard earlier I already had several records listed here. i've followed re-installed and got the same problem. bind9 ...done.

apt-get install bind9 3. Is it ok to be constantly that high? It was upgraded with 'do-release-upgrade'. Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.

Home Forums Posting Rules Linux Help & Resources Fedora Set-Up Guides Fedora Magazine Ask Fedora Fedora Project Fedora Project Links The Fedora Project Get Fedora F23 Release Notes F24 Release Notes