freebsd error while extracting base txz Saint Johnsbury Center Vermont

Address 260 Cottage St Ste B, Littleton, NH 03561
Phone (603) 444-3388
Website Link http://profiletechnologies.com
Hours

freebsd error while extracting base txz Saint Johnsbury Center, Vermont

and it destroyed the FAT-32 partition that was 2nd on the disk and I only made slices for up to 30GB on the 40GB UFS partition. ................................. ................................. Was im Übrigen auch ein gutes Argument war. For example see HOWTO: Modern FreeBSD Install (vermaden way) __________________ You don't need to be a genius to debug a pf.conf firewall ruleset, you just need the guts to run tcpdump Commenting out the check for NO_PROFILE in the Makefile was sufficient for the libsunacl port install to succeed.

One thing for sure, I learn how to be more careful, but please, no more crash-course. Hmm, can't find any help via google. Drop to a shell, ... Wenn man unbedingt ein Konfigurationsprogramm will, kann man nach wie vor "sysinstall" auf der Shell starten.

Keyboad is gone and I have to pull-the-plug: SMP: AP CPU #1 LAUNCHED! I think FreeBSD was just throwing it out as you indicated Beastie. GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure Last edited by sharris; 7th July 2011 at 11:25 PM.

Beastie View Public Profile Find all posts by Beastie #5 (View Single Post) 6th July 2011 sharris Package Pilot Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 146 Quote: Though PS: chflags -Rv noschg /mnt/* war erfolgreich. Anyway, also it throws your HDD out of wack. Who knows.

And as I reacall it defaulted to UFS for myself. org Date: 2012-05-02 18:33:18 Message-ID: 201205021833.q42IXIZX036658 () freefall ! They came to far to be playing guesting games that could break the OS five to ten years down the line completely. Give this a try.

This is what I tried and it don't make UFS partitions that's why I dump it for cfdisk. and it's nothing but the way of Todays Technology. Es wird nach root-Passwort gefragt 9.x. now I find this: 05-12-2011 FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201105-amd64-dvd1.iso ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201105/ How to install fbsd 9.0 http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/750 and /tmp is still in there to fill up your HDD a difference way, so ...

permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]ConradBHart42[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago(1 child)Progress! Let ZFS manage the configuration. Here's something I found about REAL BSD labels: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/ahci.html EXTENDED-4.. sharris View Public Profile Find all posts by sharris #6 (View Single Post) 6th July 2011 Carpetsmoker Real Name: Martin Old man from scene 24 Join Date:

Carpetsmoker View Public Profile Visit Carpetsmoker's homepage! If it was, the devs wouldn't still be working on improvements and extensions from time to time (including now -- 64-bit quotas). You should really have two if you use ZFS. It's only for 10.1 It's a deadlock during shutdown that relates to softupdates and journaling on UFS Here's the PR.

This is a shot in the dark, but maybe it's the partition table you're using? The bind99 port now installs configuration files and a startup script in /usr/local/etc. Anyway it did a complete install. I like the old FreeBSD installer.

I think this is zfs so this may be right up the desktop people alley for what I read about zfs. I agree, but I couldn't figure out how to get rid of it. Unofficial/unsupported methods existed for a long time anyway... 2. Using load-path (/usr/ports/editors/emacs-nox11/work/emacs-24.3/lisp \ /usr/ports/editors/emacs-nox11/work/emacs-24.3/lisp/emacs-lisp \ /usr/ports/editors/emacs-nox11/work/emacs-24.3/lisp/language \ /usr/ports/editors/emacs-nox11/work/emacs-24.3/lisp/international \ /usr/ports/editors/emacs-nox11/work/emacs-24.3/lisp/textmodes) Loading emacs-lisp/byte-run...

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167527 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] Configure | About | News If so, that may be the next show stopper Ok, I had to try one more time and when I gave it a ready-made 30GB UFS again this time I did Either use the bsdinstall-based CDs, or the PC-BSD CD. Hmmm, I may never know.

freebsd-boot ada0p8 ... 32 GB ... If that resolves it, patch with freebsd-update (actually, do that anyway). Than I found a extra drive to test on. I manage very large disk arrays (some in excess of 16 TB) and I can't imagine trying to run one of my larger PostgreSQL databases on software RAID.

Drives are cheap. In sysinstalls, fdisk you can - or should be able to - select the T option for file system type of a partition, then use 165 for UFS, did you try Thanks phoenix BTW, I hate writing because I don't know how to talk and I have no time to learn how-to present myself. Months of work and notes could have been destroyed.

Elwood, 24 Januar 2012 #12 Yamagi Possessed With Psi Powers Mitarbeiter Registriert seit: 14 April 2004 Beiträge: 8.378 Ort: Schleswig-Holstein Wahrscheinlich ist es wirklich ein Problem mit "schg" oder einer anderen The system came up and started frying one of my drives. A ISO designed for a dangerously dedicated disk install. New installer is not yet complete.

portsnap fetch extract installiert dir den Porttree Rakor, 11 Januar 2012 #2 michaelffm New Member Registriert seit: 25 November 2008 Beiträge: 102 Cool ich hab das immer über sysinstall gemacht.