forrtl error 72 floating overflow Prosper Texas

We are Denton County’s preferred provider of professional I.T. consulting services.  We are THE people to call when you’ve tried everyone else and they can’t cut it, or when you want your job done right the first time.  We have a combined total of over 30 years of experience.  We handle everything from small residential jobs to large multi-location corporate projects.  Our largest customer has 15 locations spanning the entire US, and we support all 15 locations.  There is literally no job too big or too small.  From simple computer repair or virus removal to servers to highly complex interconnected offices, we have you covered.

Address Denton, TX 76205
Phone (940) 239-6500
Website Link
Hours

forrtl error 72 floating overflow Prosper, Texas

But I have checked the arguments comming in the C code and there isn't problem. All calculated values are ok but stop in the middle of a function JJ21(nu,aexp). This is the correct thing to do, since the C is expecting a vector that is contiguous in memory. How have you declared cmp_chem_noneq within cooling_module.f90, and please don't say you just declare it EXTERNAL.

How have you declared cmp_chem_noneq within cooling_module.f90, and please don't say you just declare it EXTERNAL. tracer indices for Si, CaCO3 content<         kFe, kPO4, kDOP, kNO3, kNH4, kSiO3, & ! Green (Intel) It's hard to say if uini is the cause. I'm compiling with F90 = mpif90FFLAGS = -O3 -g -traceback -fpe0 -ftrapuv -cpp -DNDIM=$(NDIM) -DNPRE=$(NPRE) -DSOLVER$(SOLVER) -DNOSYSTEMI'll compile it with the options given by you. The stacktrace into evol_single_cell() and

Green (Intel) Quoting - jpprieto Quoting - Ronald W. If not, add some code to the C to check the arguments coming in. Since that is where the problem occurs, getting a traceback of the Fortran code does not help. No.I'm compiling the code without -g.

IEEE invalid condition (Invalid Raised) res_inv = zero / zero write(6,100)"Invalid: ", zero, " /", zero, " = ", res_inv 100 format(A14,E8.1,A2,E8.1,A2,E10.1) end Consider the following command line: ifort fpe.f90 nutrient uptake half-sat constants>           Qp,                                 & ! P/C ratio>           gQfe_0, gQfe_min,                   & ! If the main program is not Fortran, the user can use the Fortran intrinsic FOR_SET_FPE to set the floating-point exception behavior.

I'd also try compiler options -g -traceback -fp-stack-check -check all -warn all ron Hi, Ronald.The line 323 is:call evol_single_cell(astart,aend,dasura,h,omegab,omega0,omegaL,-1.0d0,T2end,mu,ne,.false.)the type of the input variables isreal(kind=8) :: astart,aend,dasura,T2end,mu,nereal(kind=8) :: h,omegab,omega0,omegaL About the Alternatively, one would probably need to put lots of print statements into the source in refmac5_, starting with hkon_occup.f and solvent_contr_mask.f, to see if the location of the relevant calculation can From the last trace we see that on the Fortran side an array temporary is created since you are passing a row vector that is discontiguous in memory. This function is called by IR1Gl(nu,aexp) and this function is called by cpm_chem_noneq(...).I'm compilig the c program with mpicc -g -w -c.The output of ramses.pe isrm: cannot remove `/tmp/70484.1.bigmem.q/rsh': No such

When I activate the MPI architecture (with mpif90) the program compile but when I run the program it tells me: forrtl: error (72): floating overflowImage PC Routine Line Sourceramses3d 00000000005F3C48 Unknown The program runs in a good way but presents a detail: The modified program calls to system command but the command is not ejecuted, this is very strange. I'm compiling with F90 = mpif90FFLAGS = -O3 -g -traceback -fpe0 -ftrapuv -cpp -DNDIM=$(NDIM) -DNPRE=$(NPRE) -DSOLVER$(SOLVER) -DNOSYSTEMI'll compile it with the options given by you. The program runs in a good way but presents a detail: The modified program calls to system command but the command is not ejecuted, this is very strange.

Once I switched to FOCE with interaction, this error will show up and stop the fitting. Best wishes    Top Log in or register to post comments February 19, 2015 - 7:18am #6 jedwards It looks like you turned on the PIO_DEBUG flag as well as the DEBUG All arguments have the correct value.About cmp_chem_noneq: The coolinghd.c code start with (to the end)int cmp_chem_noneq_(double *rhob,double *T2,double *dt,double *DT2,double *mu,double *a,double uini[],int *ii){ ...And inside the cooling_module.f90 I call to ron I'm using MPICH2 andmpif90 for 1.0.6 Version 10.0I don't know how to see the last information you need: MPI-...

This option sets -IPF_fp_speculationstrict (Linux and Mac OS) or /QIPF_fp_speculationstrict (Windows) if no specific -IPF_fp_speculation or /QIPF_fp_speculation option is specified. Following a cursory look at the code in the refmac5_ directory, primarily in hkon_occup.f, it seems that all floating point types are REAL. ron Top jpprieto Wed, 07/29/2009 - 10:18 Quoting - Ronald W. Note On systems based on the IA-32 and Intel® 64 architectures , explicitly setting -fpe1 or /fpe:1 can degrade performance since the generated code stream must be synchronized after each floating-point

Green (Intel) It's unclear from what you have sent. Top jpprieto Sat, 07/11/2009 - 12:40 Quoting - jpprieto Quoting - Ronald W. Do you have a debugger like TotalView you can use to debug MPI? Top Ronald W Green (Intel) Tue, 07/14/2009 - 07:34 It's hard to say if uini is the cause.

Without a trace on the C code we don't have enough to go on. Top Ronald W Green (Intel) Fri, 07/10/2009 - 14:47 Quoting - jpprieto Quoting - Ronald W. Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen From: "WANG,YANING" [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] Forrtl: error(72): floating overflow? I'm compiling with F90 = mpif90FFLAGS = -O3 -g -traceback -fpe0 -ftrapuv -cpp -DNDIM=$(NDIM) -DNPRE=$(NPRE) -DSOLVER$(SOLVER) -DNOSYSTEMI'll compile it with the options given by you. The stacktrace into evol_single_cell() and

Top Back to original post Leave a Comment Please sign in to add a comment. Um Google Groups Discussions nutzen zu können, aktivieren Sie JavaScript in Ihren Browsereinstellungen und aktualisieren Sie dann diese Seite. . The grogram run but does't ejecute the comand. Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen Um Google Groups Discussions nutzen zu können, aktivieren Sie JavaScript in Ihren Browsereinstellungen und aktualisieren Sie dann diese Seite. .

If a floating-point underflow occurs, the result is set to zero and execution continues. P/C ratio<         gQfe_0, gQfe_min,                   & ! I modified this program. ron evol_single_cell is a fortran program.

Regards, Michael -- Michael Strickler, Ph.D. Sometimes, a cheap, sleazy way around insufficient-precision REALs on the Alpha is to recompile with the flag "-real_size 64". thanks -- - Lorri Top joseph-krahn Mon, 07/27/2009 - 16:38 Quoting - jpprieto Quoting - Ronald W. If a floating underflow occurs, the result is set to zero and execution continues.

Without a trace on the C code we don't have enough to go on. The unmodified program (without .C) ejecutes correctly the system command.The .f90 program can run with an MPI architecture. Next by Date: [ccp4bb]: homology model building Prev by thread: [ccp4bb]: REFMAC5 - error (72): floating overflow Next by thread: Re: [ccp4bb]: REFMAC5 - error (72): floating overflow Index(es): Date Thread As a quick test, you could print the first and last value of UINI from Fortran before the call, and from C after the call.

Without a trace on the C code we don't have enough to go on. Green (Intel) It's unclear from what you have sent. RSS Top 18 posts / 0 new Last post For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice. Hi,After carrying out the above changes, the model still crashes and (altough in debug mode) I only get the following message:ionf_mod.F90         252 CFILE closing :      -131072 ionf_mod.F90         252 CFILE closing :      -131072 piolib_mod.f90       

tracer indices for Chl, C, Fe content>           Si_ind, CaCO3_ind                ! tracer indices for Si, CaCO3 content61,66c63,66<         Chl_ind, C_ind, Fe_ind,             & ! This function is called by IR1Gl(nu,aexp) and this function is called by cpm_chem_noneq(...).I'm compilig the c program with mpicc -g -w -c.The output of ramses.pe isrm: cannot remove `/tmp/70484.1.bigmem.q/rsh': No such If evol_single_cell is Fortran, compile everything with: -gen-interfaces -warn interfaces to make sure that the calling sequence is correct.

Green (Intel) It's unclear from what you have sent. All seems ok but suddenly the program stop.