fatal error in mpi_wait Italy Texas

Address Red Oak, TX 75154
Phone (972) 576-8707
Website Link http://redoakcomputer.com
Hours

fatal error in mpi_wait Italy, Texas

If you don't want >>>> to mess around WRF source code, you may want to contact WRF >>>> developers to see if they have encountered similar problem >>>> before. >>>> >>>> aborting job: Fatal error in MPI_Wait: Invalid MPI_Request, error stack: MPI_Wait(139): MPI_Wait(request=0xffffd6a4, status0xffffd690) failed MPI_Wait(75) : Invalid MPI_Request rank 0 in job 1

I think both the mpich2 and openmpi problems are somewhat related. A 16-core run on a 16-core node succeeds, but fails on a pair of 12-core nodes. Is there any job that can't be automated? How many processes did you actually use??

Then anyone with a TCP socket open to that now-dead process receives a RST packet and bails out before the process manager can kill it. int dynamicDataLength = 0; dynamicDataSizes.resize(entry.messages.size()); for (pluint iMessage=0; iMessage

I don't see anything >>>> obviously wrong in your mpiexec verbose output (though >>>> I am not hydra expert). I haven't compiled the pythonic directory (From the user guide I believe it isn't necessary), however I know for a fact that I don't have Swig or the other libraries mentioned I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't overlooking somthing in the syntax or the way the code was setup. This list of combinations is not exhaustive, and I thought it was pretty clear that the problem arose when I tried to do a run involving more than one host/node.

Click here to login This forum is powered by Phorum. [mpich-discuss] Problems Running WRF on Ubuntu 11.10, MPICH2 Sukanta Basu sukanta.basu at gmail.com Wed Feb 8 21:33:50 CST 2012 Previous message: that could have multiple causes, the most trivial ones would be that you did not adjust Fix::comm_forward to the necessary size or didn't provide the current buffer size when calling the I have run it succesfully in other occasions. Before we go digging into this, you might want to consider upgrading to the latest version: 1.1.1p1. -- Pavan comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by goodell Are you running on 10G

It now runs with any array sizes. A Shadowy Encounter What kind of bicycle clamps are these? The bug fix has now been integrated in the newest Palabos release, and as of version 1.4 things should be fine. This can cause a job to hang indefinitely while it waits for all processes to call "init".

Yes, I did try MP_STACK_SIZE and >>>>> OMP_STACKSIZE. Skip to content Advanced search Board index Change font size FAQ Register Login Information The requested topic does not exist. How to add an sObject to a sublislist? this process called "init", but exited without calling "finalize".

if ((my_rank) == 1) { MPI_Isend(northedge1, Rows, MPI_DOUBLE, my_rank+2, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &send_request); } if ((my_rank) == 3) { MPI_Irecv(northofnorthedge3, Rows, MPI_DOUBLE, my_rank-2, MPI_ANY_TAG, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &send_request); } MPI_Wait(&send_request, &status); ..... Thanks in advance, Estibaliz Back to top mkcolgJoined: 30 Jun 2004Posts: 6764Location: The Portland Group Inc. I search on google and some one says it > is because of the insufficient buf or too much data to send. Browse other questions tagged c++ mpi or ask your own question.

Thank you for your help. I'm sure I tried this combination yesterday and it failed then! Your "bad_alloc" exceptions show a failure to allocate memory, but I cannot imagine where this would come from, since the problem is a 2D one on a 100x100 grid. Is accuracy a binary?

I can successfully run codes under Platform MPI. Reply Quote [email protected] Re: MPI job won't work on multiple hosts May 13, 2013 08:38PM Admin Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 102 Hi Coastlab_lgw, Thank you for reporting the bug and So there's no valid send_request in rank 0, so the MPI_Wait is invalid. Thanks in advance!

I've also tried this with the Poiseuille showCase, and it works fine under all conditions. And now I have fixed it, I found that in src/parallelism/sendRecvPool.cpp: void SendPoolCommunicator::startCommunication(int toProc, bool staticMessage) { std::map::iterator entryPtr = subscriptions.find(toProc); PLB_ASSERT( entryPtr != subscriptions.end() ); CommunicatorEntry& entry = entryPtr->second; std::vector URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20090820/a6ff8680/attachment.html Previous message: [Wrf-users] CAM subgrid scheme and WRF regional climate simulations Next message: [Wrf-users] hardware questions Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { .... ....

Thanks! –Ashmohan May 19 '11 at 0:20 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign Visit the Trac open source project athttp://trac.edgewall.org/ [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [lammps-users] Problem with comm->forward_comm_fix From: Axel Kohlmeyer Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:18:49 -0400 On I am currently updating from OpenMPI 1.5.5 to 1.6.3 -- we'll see if the problem goes away then. I don't see why this could have anything to do with my problem, but assuming there isn't a code bug, I'm out of ideas.

axel. > > Thanks in advance. > > Han > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lammps-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lammps-users > -- Dr. if (!entry.data.empty()) { global::profiler().increment("mpiSendChar", (plint)entry.data.size()); global::mpi().iSend(&entry.data[0], entry.data.size(), toProc, &entry.messageRequest); } } The temporary variable with red color, which would be sent as the sizes of dynamic data to other process, can The program runs for about 10 hours and then dies with these messages *rank 59 in job 1 garl-fire15.local_39996 caused collective abort of all ranks exit status of rank 59: killed this process did not call "init" before exiting, but others in the job did.

Everything runs fine. Looking for data to run the WRF? The LSF cluster is new and in testing, but the grid-engine cluster has been operational for many years. it is also troubling that you seem to be expecting a buffer size of 0 consistently.

Palabos also works fine under Platform-MPI. I've seen this problem in both Palabos 1.1 and Palabos 1.2. By rule, all processes that call "init" MUST call "finalize" prior to exiting or it will be considered an "abnormal termination" This may have caused other processes in the application to int pos=0; for (pluint iMessage=0; iMessage

Italy. What is the most expensive item I could buy with £50? Sure enough, when all processes are on a single host, everything works, but when processes are spread across more than one host, the run fails. I just installed openmpi and recompiled WRF.

Note that you must have the PGI CDK product to use the MPI debugging feature. - Mat[/url] Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 This can cause a job to hang indefinitely while it waits for all processes to call "init". it also happens when people misread or misuse the code or use incompatible or incorrect computations that collide with what LAMMPS is doing. I have also checked free memory during the run, its almost always ~2GB.