failed to run array dev md0 input output error Grapevine Texas

Computer services to monitor, maintain, and secure your computer systems servers, and network

Address 14843 Chancey St, Addison, TX 75001
Phone (972) 800-9011
Website Link http://mdhtech.com
Hours

failed to run array dev md0 input output error Grapevine, Texas

So its better to use sda1, sdb1, sdc1 etc. Mount the filesystem to replay the log, and unmount it before re-running xfs_repair. Adv Reply July 10th, 2008 #4 siDDis View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Just Give Me the Beans! Anyway, I'm up and running. -- Johnny Ljunggren, Navtek AS Tlf: 918 50 411, 33 07 10 77 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the

Game of Life, a shorter story The mortgage company is trying to force us to make repairs after an insurance claim Truth in numbers Removing elements from an array that are g.. I spent an age looking at the web reading what are embarrassingly old "Linux RAID Software HOWTO" (Btw. The data on the disks is not irreplaceable data -- everything that was on there is backed up in some form or another, or is stuff which I'm not going to

Password Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. How do computers remember where they store things? Did Sputnik 1 have attitude control? Physically locating the server How would they learn astronomy, those who don't see the stars?

I really cannot see what I did wrong, or what I could do different if the situation were to happen again. more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science [email protected]:/$ sudo xfs_repair -L /dev/md10 Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... SATA cable.

This site is not affiliated with Linus Torvalds or The Open Group in any way. Join Date Oct 2008 Posts 1 Quick thank you... Logical fallacy: X is bad, Y is worse, thus X is not bad Which day of the week is today? I mean...

First of all, I lost a drive (completely, it is not even recognized by the BIOS), then I replaced it with a new one; rebuilding has started but has been interrupted mdadm -Q, -E and -X don't show anything wrong except that disk in array are out of sync. Join Date Nov 2006 Posts 4 Ok, I tried hacking up the superblocks with mddump. I've tried recreating the array with 'missing' devices and just a two disks, but no combination was successful.

When I try to add the new disk I get a really unhelpful error message: excession# mdadm --manage /dev/md127 --add /dev/sdc mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdc as 5: Invalid Use dd_rescue, for e. What's the point of running a raid array if every time a single disk fails it kills the whole array? By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features.

I have made some progress, I think. UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. The log message implies that it is "starting background reconstruction" but it is not clear to me if this is actually happening or not. /proc/mdstat doesn't show anything in progress: excession# Is there any job that can't be automated?

ARGH!!! How to decrypt a broken S/MIME message sent by Outlook? These are new disks and I don't think there are anything physically wrong with them. Caller 0xffffffffa0226837 [ 790.082905] [ 790.083004] Pid: 3211, comm: mount Tainted: P O 3.2.0-38-generic #61-Ubuntu [ 790.083010] Call Trace: [ 790.084139] XFS (md10): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 3729

Reply With Quote 06-Aug-2008,19:20 #2 mingus725 View Profile View Forum Posts View Blog Entries View Articles Shaman Penguin Join Date Jun 2008 Location Atlanta, Georgia, USA Posts 2,422 Re: Can not I've gathered the following information - some incomplete as I've manually copied it to another computer: $ cat /proc/mdstat .... thanks Johnny Ljunggren - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Report this message #2: excession# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md0 : active raid5 sdd[3] sdb[1] sda[0] 4395411456 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3]

How do I explain that this is a terrible idea? I powered down, took the disk out, restarted and left the array unstarted. Ask Ubuntu works best with JavaScript enabled On reboot, mdadm showed that the array was resyncing; that seems to have completed but still no luck in accessing /home.

Shutting down filesystem [ 790.217654] XFS (md10): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s) [ 790.217761] XFS (md10): xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf() returned error 5. [ 790.217775] XFS (md10): xlog_recover_clear_agi_bucket: failed to Don't use this disk in that RAID while recovering it. A quick check of the array: Code: [[email protected] ~]# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md0 : active raid6 sdb1[8] sdc1[1] sdi1[7] sdh1[6] sdg1[5] sdf1[4] sde1[3] sdd1[2] 2344252416 blocks level Having a problem logging in?

I was able to start the array, for reading at least. (baby steps...) Here's how: Code: [[email protected] ~]# cat /sys/block/md0/md/array_state inactive [[email protected] ~]# echo "clean" > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state [[email protected] ~]# cat /sys/block/md0/md/array_state Note that destroying the log may cause corruption -- please attempt a mount of the filesystem before doing this. This riddle could be extremely useful Does chilli get milder with cooking? Four days ago some ticking noises were heard from the workstation, and the GUI ubuntu disk utility showed some bad sectors, but things were otherwise green.

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed You will have to register before you can post in the forums. (Be aware the forums do not accept user names with a dash "-") Also, logging in lets you avoid Only when you're sure it's properly assembling, you can make it persistent with assume-clean re-creation. I can confirm that this works.

Ultimately, I started reading through the kernel source and wandered into a helpful text file Documentation/md.txt in the kernel source tree. Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? What is the most expensive item I could buy with £50? I can't be certain, but I think the problem was that the state of the good drives (and the array) were marked as "active" rather than "clean." (active == dirty?) I

asked 3 years ago viewed 2651 times active 3 years ago Related 1Testing my raid array / is my mdadm raid working OK?2Raid 5 mdadm Problem - Help Please1RAID 5 Inactive I'm really reluctant to issue commands against the thing (such a attempting a new create) without understanding why it is not working and what the two errors indicate. I'm really reluctant to issue commands against the thing (such a attempting a new create) without understanding why it is not working and what the two errors indicate. New tech, old clothes Why is the spacesuit design so strange in Sunshine?

I don't understand why run is not working. md1 : inactive sdb3[1](S) sdd1[3](S) sdc2[2](S) sda1[0](S) 1250273760 blocks super 1.0 Mounting has failed $ mount /dev/md1 EXT4-fs (md1): unable to read superblock Scanning did find the metadata $ mdadm --examine The time now is 07:40 AM.