firmware update failed on /dev/sdb internal error Milligan College Tennessee

Address 185 Picadilly Ln, Johnson City, TN 37615
Phone (423) 283-9065
Website Link

firmware update failed on /dev/sdb internal error Milligan College, Tennessee

I had to do what I found in this comment: In my case: $ sudo rm /var/lib/initramfs-tools/ Followed by a quick: $ sudo update-initramfs -u to make sure it worked. Report Abuse Message 52 of 135 (5,201 Views)   Reply alex486 Tracer Lite Posts: 412 Registered: ‎04-21-2012 1 Re: Feedback Thread: Firmware MU02 for M550 [Edited] Options Mark as New Bookmark Internal should work right out of the box. Any ideas for my particular variation?

Is it OK for graduate students to draft the research proposal for their advisor’s funding application (like NIH’s or NSF’s grant application)? Tried booting in with a previous kernel? If you find the answer relevant to your situation, please feel free to come back and share it with us! All rights reserved.REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.πRendered by PID 415 on app-531 at 2016-10-15 18:47:33.358824+00:00 running 57dd115 country code: DE.

Your system could be in an unusable state. From the change list I could naively infer that the issue may have come from:Improved stability, Efficiency, and Performance during power state transitionsAny thoughts would be appreciated, in all honesty this You will need to look into that, because this isn't common. THANK YOU!!!

Did it rescue you from hours of headache? If you can't get to the desktop, try the recovery option which takes you to a (Linux) command prompt. can't recall) to 16.04.1 and the end of the process threw a "Sorry, Ubuntu 16.04 has experienced an internal error." It has an UnreportableReason of: This problem report is damaged and You won't be able to vote or comment. 012200D Flash memory failing (self.fortinet)submitted 7 months ago by Cloud_LegendI've had 3 200Ds needing to be RMAed due to the flash storage on them starting to fail.

on January 29, 2011 at 11:34 am | Reply brdhse1 All tried, none worked. TMEsidetone602TAC Engineerfortinet_modabout moderation team »discussions in /r/fortinet<>X2 points · 2 comments Slow L2TP IPSec VPN5 points · 4 comments Fortinet 5.2.9 and deep ssl inspection1 points · 1 comment Referrer-host option in webfilter profile1 points · 2 comments FortiGate 200D SMART support is: Enabled And look! Re: FortiOS 5.6.0 beta Re: Help required with report for specific URL Re: FortiAP as WiFi Client Re: firewall design for PCI DSS requirement Re: FortiGate 60D Site-to-Site VPN loses VoIP

So the first thing after that, is I asked for a reinstall of initramfs-tools in Synaptic, and now, yet again, it is stuck at Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools .. At this point, choose the TFTP options and watch the hashes "#####" grow until the firmware is loaded. Tried to install FGLRX via Hardware Drivers, did everything right, until it got stuck at: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-24-generic I turned off initramfs update in config file and dpkg -configure -a successfully. on April 20, 2012 at 7:41 pm | Reply M Shankar Rao thanks a lot mr ubuntu genius on April 21, 2012 at 6:18 pm | Reply siddhant i tried to

If the problem relates to the Web GUI; please provide your browsers version and operating system. More often than not, when you reboot, you won't be able to get to your desktop, so it's best to tackle any issues before you do so. You'll be editing a text configuration file as superuser, so paste the following into a terminal: sudo gedit /etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf Locate the line "update_initramfs=yes" and change it to "update_initramfs=no". permalinkembedsavegive gold[–]zuzuzzzipFortiGate-200D 0 points1 point2 points 7 months ago(0 children)Had the exact same issue on one of our 200D's running 5.2.3.

Here's my problem in a nut shell. At this point OSX asked me that I had to select the boot disk and showed me the SSD as the only available boot drive. Took a few seconds for the DVD to appear. on January 28, 2011 at 3:18 pm | Reply Ubuntu Genius Did you look at the comment by Alecks?

If you were lucky enough to see the initramfs update fail in the terminal, you can usually have success by running it again. The main thing is to determine is the correct disk number and it can change after reboots and ejecting and swapping devices.When you write the grubefiusb.img to USB the command line What is a type system? Disk logging causing the max number of flash writes to be exceeded, there's an advisory out there detailing it somewhere.

All I can suggest past that is to Google terms like "BusyBox v1 cant boot ubuntu"; if you don't find your answer in the first dozen or so pages of search Internal split into individual ports (internal1, internal2...internalx) are not created until after the config is loaded into memory and executed.A few things to check:What's the brand/manufacturer of the TFTP server?Is the OSx is latest "Yosemite"The temrinal output of diskutil list (you can ignore disk2, its my NAS running timemaschine for backups):diskutil list/dev/disk0 #: Last Resort for Boot Failure Due to initramfs Error I've listed this first, as in most cases it will work, but it should be your last resort.

Format the log disk (exec formatlogdisk) > enable disk logging and then try logging in again. Checking installed kernels with: 3. Appease Your Google Overlords: Draw the "G" Logo more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback All the best!

I dont see dissasembling of affected iMACs or MACbooks as an option, because the ruggish start again then a new update was offered.Crucial published a product and wrote its working on If you updated or upgraded your system and didn't even know anything went wrong until you failed to log in again, there are still ways to get around this. But checking Google results for that error message should eventually get you the answers. Sharing dumps violates a reddit global rule and may result in a site-wide ban.

If that file is corrupted, you would think it would just get overwritten in the update, yet deleting (or moving, if you want to play it safe) initrd.img has made all permalinkembedsavegive gold[–]Cloud_Legend[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 months ago(1 child)I figured that was most likely the issue. There may now be some type of incompatibilty between my motherboard an ASRock X99X and the M.2 drive. SMART support is: Enabled for another ssd...

IMNSHO placing the blame fully on flash limitations sucks. Anyway, it went quickly to boot Linux again so I pressed the power buttonuntil it shut-off.So, now pressing Cmd-R, I pressed power button then released Cmd-R once the Recovery mode started Without knowing anything about the hardware you have and your menuconfig options, I can't help you there. providing secure ordering & top-rated customer satisfaction since 1997.

Both "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" and "sudo apt-get upgrade" result in: E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run ‘sudo dpkg -configure -a' to correct the problem. If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why would he work at a glorified boarding school? Doing so would reduce disk writes for delete operations because entire log files would be deleted once quota is hit, not log entries – I am believe, but have not tested love u men :)Could you explain how you managed to do it ?I'm in the exact same case but with a FG 40C.Thanks #9 franchino87 New Member Total Posts : 4

Something messed up along the line and removed the init img in /boot but initramfs-tools still thought there was a kernel. Yes flash has write limitations but if you manage how you write to it properly it will last much longer than just blasting writes at it every millisecond. Is there any job that can't be automated? Try to reboot.Is there anything else I can try ?Thanks for your help #11 rwpatterson Expert Member Total Posts : 7883 Scores: 144 Reward points: 0 Joined: 2006/08/08 10:08:18Location: Long Island,

It can help increase customer's satisfaction, definitely.Have you verified that the firmware was actually updated to MU02?