ext3-fs error device sdb1 htree_dirblock_to_tree Fletcher Oklahoma

Netessentials provides business computer and network support for all of your technology needs. From sales to service to consulting and planning, our certified experts will make it easy for you to concentrate on your business, not your technology. "We make IT work for you !"

Computers, servers, security, virus removal, technology planning and consulting

Address 604 SW D Ave, Lawton, OK 73501
Phone (580) 355-6387
Website Link http://netess.net

ext3-fs error device sdb1 htree_dirblock_to_tree Fletcher, Oklahoma

This worked for me... Password Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion. Why would a password requirement prohibit a number in the last character? Any help/advice on sorting this out is greatly appreciated.

DisclaimerThis Support Knowledgebase provides a valuable tool for NetIQ/Novell/SUSE customers and parties interested in our products and solutions to acquire information, ideas and learn from one another. This site is not affiliated with Linus Torvalds or The Open Group in any way. If yes, have you checked the output of smartctl option device?Let's put a call out to others for their opinions on file systems that suddenly go into read-only mode . . Now as they (the pair of systems) are providing a critical service (in the sense that you have them configured as load-balancing, etc), I would think that upstairs really should give

Each drive had two partitions (sda1, sda2, sdb1, sdb2). smartd is running and I see:smartctl -H -l selftest /dev/sdasmartctl version 5.36 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce AllenHome page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/SMART Health Status: OKDevice does not support Self Test loggingThis only You can ping me on IRC to give me the bug numbers if you like. Should I oblige when a client asks to use a design as a logo when it wasn't made to be the logo in the first place?

The time now is 06:13 AM. more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log Is this because SDB is bad?

Problems continued. 3. Many Thanks Adv Reply Quick Navigation General Help Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Three of five RAID arrays suffered permanent dammage and could not be repaired. For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration.

Provide Feedback © Micro Focus Careers Legal close Feedback Print Full Simple Request a Call Follow Us Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn Newsletter Subscription RSS CentOS The share|improve this answer edited Sep 27 '13 at 11:17 answered Sep 27 '13 at 10:57 slm♦ 165k40304474 Dude, the server is down and require manual check. Register If you are a new customer, register now for access to product evaluations and purchasing capabilities. kernel:EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_journal_start_sb:Detected aborted journal kernel:Remounting filesystem read-only kernel:EXT3-fs error (device sda1): htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory #2: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0 Environment

Document ID:3554036Creation Date:05-JAN-08Modified Date:30-APR-12SUSESUSE Linux Enterprise DesktopSUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time ExtensionSUSE Linux Enterprise Server Did this document solve your problem? kernel is "Linux giant 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Thu Jun 26 12:18:07 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux"thanks,Peteredit: the reason I bring this up as similar to the above is that this And what about "double-click"? Top rotorboy Posts: 26 Joined: 2005/03/03 23:02:04 Re: ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 8441457 in dir #8441317 Quote Postby rotorboy » 2008/11/04 22:29:15 Thanks for your help! 2000+ postings...

I am not totally sure who mounts it at boot up but it's unmountable on a running system. >umount /xxx umount: can't umount /xxx: Device or resource busy Now due to You may want to run SMART test on it, but with such values it's just a formality, it's highly unlikely it won't fail. Posts: 14,683 Rep: SSD ? Browse other questions tagged linux hardware ssd ext4 drive-failure or ask your own question.

Well it just happened again and now I'm totally lost as to what the cause might be. Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view 17 posts 1 2 Next Return to “CentOS And what would cause an error like the above? Open Source Communities Comments Helpful 1 Follow In /var/log/messages , "EXT3-fs error (device sda1): htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory #2: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0" Solution

Players stopping other player actions If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why would he work at a glorified boarding school? Learn More Red Hat Product Security Center Engage with our Red Hat Product Security team, access security updates, and ensure your environments are not exposed to any known security vulnerabilities. Not the answer you're looking for? Join our community today!

Here's my scenario. bad hard drive or hardware11How can I recover an ext4 filesystem corrupted after a fsck?5Partition required for ext4 filesystem?0Errors when repairing ext4 filesystem1DegradedArray event after rsync but later mdadm and smartctl Here is what we see in the logs: Nov 14 14:39:28 hostname kernel: EXT3-fs error (device dm-2): htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory #2392098: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, I have forced a resync of the raid array twice.

Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies. Thanks for letting me know about that, and i appreciate you opening the new bug should you see it again. :) Thanks! ~JFo Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote on 2010-08-12: #10 This Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ 2818.977023] EXT3-fs error (device md1): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ 2818.977025] Remounting filesystem read-only Mar 12 10:57:32 marc kernel: [ Top AlanBartlett Forum Moderator Posts: 9296 Joined: 2007/10/22 11:30:09 Location: ~/Earth/UK/England/Suffolk Contact: Contact AlanBartlett Website Re: ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 8441457 in dir #8441317 Quote Postby AlanBartlett » 2008/11/01 13:40:38 My suggestion:(1)

Am I out of the woods now, or is there more checking of some kind that I should do to make sure this isn't going to be happening again?