ext3-fs error block bitmap not in group Enid Oklahoma

Address 909 N Cleveland St, Enid, OK 73703
Phone (580) 233-1632
Website Link

ext3-fs error block bitmap not in group Enid, Oklahoma

Chances are you just need to run (from memory, might be slightly incorrect) fdisk /dev/sda, and then n, 1, 82 (or whatever number a linux filesystem is), return a few times When it was back all Windows booted right up. It's a straight-forward setup, just one hard drive on /dev/sda1 but it won't even mount. FIXED.

Block bitmap for group 30533 is not in group. (block 1000532368) Relocate? I'm pretty sure my HDD is OK, in fact, I can see all the /dev/sda1 files with testdisk! –jcora Mar 12 '13 at 23:59 | show 5 more comments Your Answer Determine if a coin system is Canonical need book id, written before 1996, it's about a teleport company that sends students learning to become colonists to another world Why does the i guess that you use plain dm-crypt and didn't set cipher, hash and hash size in the crypttab, thus running into issues with the changed defaults. > For the failure cases,

What you might want to check is to do a vgdisplay -v /dev/vg03 to see what the physical volumes are present in the volume group. Join our community today! If you don't have a backup then I would use dd to make an image of that entire disk before I messed with it. Would probably be easier then trying to fix the fs manually. –innerand Nov 24 '13 at 12:13 OK no worries, thanks just for answering!

It will scan for and recover many partition errors. mini howto: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9216264&postcount=14 grumpy.biatchJune 4th, 2010, 03:57 PMwhy is there 2 swap partitions ? Top pschaff Retired Moderator Posts: 18276 Joined: 2006/12/13 20:15:34 Location: Tidewater, Virginia, North America Contact: Contact pschaff Website Re: EXT3-fs error after running fsck Quote Postby pschaff » 2012/02/02 17:36:45 No Since it changed the file system to ext2 from ext3 I am little worried.

Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Error allocating 1 contiguous block(s) in block group 4700 for block bitmap: Could not allocate block in ext2 filesystem Error allocating 1 contiguous block(s) Request was from Debbugs Internal Request to [email protected] (Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:35:16 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. After that it asked me two questions about reallocation, to both of which I had answered "yes". Block bitmap for group 4352 is not in group. (block 2553887680) Relocate?

Host went down taking all 10 with it. Dec 8 18:07:12 xx kernel: EXT3-fs: group descriptors corrupted! I should probably start using crypttab - I didn't know what it was before. Ubuntu Forums > The Ubuntu Forum Community > Ubuntu Official Flavours Support > General Help > [SOLVED] file system failure in 9.10 PDA View Full Version : [SOLVED] file system failure

I'll try the data recovery route as well while I don't have any other solutions. grumpy.biatchJune 4th, 2010, 04:19 PMclick on the "thread tools" above. "mark as solved" is in there. Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started What is the most expensive item I could buy with £50?

If you need to reset your password, click here. It's funny watching an answer mushroom like that. Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ I follow you completely on what you're saying.

Inode bitmap for group 4355 is not in group. (block 771751943) Relocate? In order to do that, I had to boot up a Ubuntu Live 12.1 DVD and use GParted (I was resizing my main partition which had everything). I Error: File system has an incompatible feature enabled. yes Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Relocating group 30533's block bitmap to 1000524246...

Browse other questions tagged filesystem ext4 fsck or ask your own question. I'd rather avoid a full installation followed by a restore which I've no experience at executing. I wanted to install Windows alongside my Debian installation in order to play some games. Reported by: David Simpson Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:45:01 UTC Severity: important Tags: squeeze Found in version cryptsetup/2:1.1.0-2.1 Done: Jonas Meurer Bug is archived.

Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/vg03/lv01 doesn't contain a valid partition table (instead of a ext3 type partition) I've tried: e2fsck -fy /dev/vg03/lv01 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) e2fsck: Group descriptors look bad... Why can't I find Phase to phase voltage like this more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact How would you help a snapping turtle cross the road? Did Sputnik 1 have attitude control?

Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. Not the answer you're looking for? Cover an unusual board with minimum chess rooks Unusual keyboard in a picture How to deal with players rejecting the question premise How to tell why macOS thinks that a certificate The Linux machine displayed "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY" and required manual fsck.

Also, it prompted me to run fsck without -a or -p option and I am executing it now.Please let me know if this is going to be an issue for the I am now able to mount the container using the latest packages using: cryptsetup -c aes-cbc-plain -h ripemd160 -s 256 -d ${KEYFILE} create container1 /dev/loop1 Just the cipher seemed to do Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) print Model: Adaptec vcdata (scsi) Disk /dev/sdc: 2999GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags Then I pvcreate'd and vgcreate'd on /dev/md0: pvscan: PV /dev/md0 VG vg03 lvm2 [6.82 TiB / 0 free] Total: 1 [6.82 TiB] / in use: 1 [6.82 TiB] / in no

greetings, jonas [signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)] Bug archived. The latter contains only one ext3 partition. How to cope with too slow Wi-Fi at hotel? Acknowledgement sent to David Simpson : New Bug report received and forwarded.

asked 5 years ago viewed 2477 times active 1 year ago Visit Chat Related 0What is the meaning of Linux e2fsck “restarting fsck from the beginning”?30How do you get e2fsck to dmesg is giving me the following: SCSI device sda: 1953525168 512-byte hdwr sectors (1000205 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 34 00 00 00 sda: assuming drive cache: cbecker78June 4th, 2010, 04:16 PMTrying to figure that out for last 30 mins. But I want to raise the matter here to know whether anyone has ever been in this situation.

Message #15 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: David Simpson To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#579162: cryptsetup: Error mounting device: EXT3-fs: group descriptors corrupted Date: Mon, 03 May The answer you refer to is regarding magic numbers, and that's not what I'm seeing - in fact that's one of several answers on askubuntu I looked at already. EXT3-fs: group descriptors corrupted! no e2fsck: Illegal inode number while checking ext3 journal for /dev/sdc Tomorrow morning, I will go to the data center to see what messages come out from the kernel (I guess

is it a LUKS > >encrypted device, or do you use plain dm-crypt? > Yes, I am using plain dm-crypt: > > cryptsetup -d ${KEYFILE} create container1 /dev/loop1 > > >i I am now able to mount the container using > the latest packages using: > > cryptsetup -c aes-cbc-plain -h ripemd160 -s 256 -d ${KEYFILE} > create container1 /dev/loop1 > >