error writing 4 bytes to client samba Altus Afb Oklahoma

Address 919 N Main St, Altus, OK 73521
Phone (580) 480-1700
Website Link
Hours

error writing 4 bytes to client samba Altus Afb, Oklahoma

anodos, Jan 29, 2015 #2 insomnium Joined: Jan 28, 2015 Messages: 3 Thanks Received: 0 Trophy Points: 1 anodos said: ↑ The message may be related to using 'hosts allow'. Result in my case is, my blu-ray player crashes, but my WD mybook remains accessible. Thanks, Kristis [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] Configure | About | News | Addalist | SponsoredbyKoreLogic Members Online Now m0nkey_, sep421, BrianS36, chipped, max.gray28gmail.com, pctine, cryptyk, EtherealMantis, RyanL, pernicius, melloa, pwnerman, eldo Total: 177 (members: 15, guests: 154, robots: 8) Share This Page Tweet FreeNAS Community Home

Error was Socket is not connected[2007/08/24 10:59:40, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.9/samba/source/lib/utilsock.c:write_socketdata(446) writesocketdata: write failure. It has been connected to the network for about a year. Error = Broken pipe[2007/08/24 11:32:24, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.9/samba/source/lib/utilsock.c:writesocket(471) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 23: ERRNO = Broken pipe[2007/08/24 11:32:24, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.9/samba/source/lib/utilsock.c:sendsmb(663) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Broken pipe)[2007/08/24 That machine is configured to forward authentication to another machine (B) that runs samba3-alpha23 authenticating against an LDAP database which resides also on machine B.

Exiting [2001/01/09 16:08:14, 1] lib/util_sock.c:client_name(1007) Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168.1.4 [2001/01/09 16:08:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Apple Info Site Map Hot News RSS Feeds Contact Us Copyright © Apple Inc. Exiting > [2001/01/09 16:08:14, 1] lib/util_sock.c:client_name(1007) > Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168.1.4 > [2001/01/09 16:08:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) > write_socket_data: write failure. This bug report doesn't include enough information to determine what piece is to blame, but in any event all the evidence suggests this is a kernel, hardware, or network problem --

I cants see a common denominator, otherthan samba. Seems to be some info on a samba issue and XP Pro issue but nothing about how to resovle the issue on a WD device.  59:41  getpeername failed. Everything works fine, but I'm constantly receiving this kind of messages (x.x.x.119 is the one that have access to CIFS shares): Jan 29 09:31:20 freenas smbd[22295]: STATUS=daemon 'smbd' finished starting up Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Feb 5 01:21:30 Server smbd[23793]: [2007/02/05 01:21:30, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1229) Feb 5 01:21:30 Server smbd[23793]: getpeername failed.

Have you found a solution ? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009 [2009/05/04 10:15:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(1059) [2009/05/04 10:15:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1607) getpeername failed. Error Connection reset by peer Feb 5 01:20:44 Server smbd[23780]: [2007/02/05 01:20:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(769) Feb 5 01:20:44 Server smbd[23780]: Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) Feb If you want to read more I suggest you google for "smb ports".

Duli skiffx15th August 2009, 08:18 AMdidnt help me... Error was Transport endpoint is not connected 2011/01/19 19:23:31  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Feb 5 01:20:44 Server smbd[23780]: [2007/02/05 01:20:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) Feb 5 01:20:44 Server smbd[23780]: write_data: write failure in writing to client 0.0.0.0. Sorry my English.

Error was Transport endpoint is not connected WD Support, can you tell us anything abou this error in teh log and how to resolve the issue on our NAS devices? If I understand things correctly, then I think this should work for newer (Win2k, WinXP, etc) machines. You have to keep pressing ok, until it allows you to finnally login. vBulletin v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Doesnt occur when my other linux box is online but does when the XP machines are running, even if they arent accessing the drive. Everything is working perfect except when a large load is going accross the firewall. I did a complete reinstall of the OS and that helped my speed issues but I'm still seeing a lot of broken pipes in the Samba log. Did the ports command do it?

I've tried to move some of the init script files as suggested often in this board but the bug is still there. I tried many things and I believe the only thing that worked was fixing the smb ports. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Duli12th July 2008, 07:35 PMI realize this is an old thread but reflects my exact issue with a CentoOS 5.2 server.

This is not a bug in Samba's code; Samba has no control over the remote end of the connection, and definitely isn't generating its own EPIPE errors. I can't found any relevant guide about this topic. Error = Connection reset by peer Has anyone seen any similar errors messages in /var/log/samba/.log ? Error Connection reset by peer [2009/05/04 10:00:07, 0] smbd/process.c:srv_send_smb(74) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Transport endpoint is not connected) [2009/05/04 10:10:57, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1405) bch (::ffff:10.4.97.175) closed connection to service

Then try to use a user with password. Possible reasons for the remote client to hang up might include a flaky NIC driver causing packets to be lost; a slow machine or buggy kernel causing Samba to be unable Error Connection reset by peer Feb 5 01:21:06 Server smbd[23785]: [2007/02/05 01:21:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(769) Feb 5 01:21:06 Server smbd[23785]: Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) Feb Last modified: Sat Oct 15 02:53:30 2016; Machine Name: beach Debian Bug tracking system Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O.

Paris): Bug#81717; Package samba. Error = Connection reset by peer 2011/01/19 19:23:31  getpeername failed. Honestly guest access +hosts allow is not a very good method of access control. Paris).

This discussion is locked Blutech Level 1 (0 points) Q: Samba Errors I am stuck, please help!I have a PC running Windows XP Professional Media Center.