gcc error value computed is not used West Elkton Ohio

We offer all repairs for all computers (both Windows PCs and Macs.)

Address 2925 Cincinnati Dayton Rd, Middletown, OH 45044
Phone (513) 571-1899
Website Link http://www.seskey.com
Hours

gcc error value computed is not used West Elkton, Ohio

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Appease Your Google Overlords: Draw the "G" Logo Exploded Suffixes Karger's Algorithm question Book of zen kōans Word with the largest number of different phonetic vowel sounds Security Patch SUPEE-8788 - No, I just turned this on to check above change and was surprised what happened. -- Pawel Previous message: [dpdk-dev] error: value computed is not used Next message: [dpdk-dev] error: value Why is absolute zero unattainable?

In that case error is notproduced (I think this is a bug in compiler). if (! date: invalid date '2016-10-16' What sense of "hack" is involved in "five hacks for using coffee filters"? I assume you did it?I did not tested this, as this was only proposal.

I only run build process and it pass.Patch proposal will be sent in a while.Post by Thomas MonjalonPlease Pawel, could you send a proper patch quickly?If nobody disagree, it'll be merged Quote:void USART_Transmit_String (unsigned char *data) {

// Wait for empty transmit buffer while (!(UCSRA&(1<

I edited my original post to include the necessary functions. –user3386754 Mar 6 '14 at 6:38 | show 2 more comments 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 2 down It is GCC extension.OK nice.I didn't test it on SUSE 11 SP3. cov(x,y)=0 but corr(x,y)=1 Convert mp4 to mp3 Using Shell Script how can you tell if the engine is not brand new? ixgbe_common.c:4429:3: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value] 4426: /* first pull in the header so we know the buffer length */ 4427: for (bi = 0; bi < dword_len; bi++) {

I don't remember exactly everythingbut my conclusion was that there was some bug in compiler. So either I am blind, or I am sitting to long on my project, actually I do not understand that warning. What's behind the word "size issues"? I think,when 'n' I constant and/or small compiler is inlining memcpy andthrowingPost by Wodkowski, PawelXPost by Thomas MonjalonPost by Qiu, MichaelPost by Wodkowski, PawelXeverything else (including returned value).

The root cause is what?I've no idea about this.Thanks,Michael Qiu, Michael 2014-12-10 09:26:30 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Hi all,Any idea?Leave this issue in DPDK?Thanks,MichaelPost by Qiu, MichaelHi all,uname -aLinux suse-11-sp3 3.0.77-0.11-xen #1 I assume you did it?I did not tested this, as this was only proposal. In that case error is notproduced (I think this is a bug in compiler). On big endian CPU, this has an effect.Hmm, I think there is a bug in lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_osdep.h:#define IXGBE_LE32_TO_CPUS(_i) rte_le_to_cpu_32(_i)It probably should be:#define IXGBE_LE32_TO_CPUS(_i) rte_le_to_cpu_32(*(_i))Not much point to do byte swapping for the

Just make it: p--; and the warning should go away. Wylach Dec 3 '10 at 17:00 Thank god the compiler actually complains ^^. –helpermethod Dec 3 '10 at 17:26 True! r~ Index: c-common.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/c-common.c,v retrieving revision 1.157 diff -c -p -d -r1.157 c-common.c *** c-common.c 2000/09/19 03:26:10 1.157 --- c-common.c 2000/09/19 08:38:22 *************** c_expand_expr_stmt (expr) *** 2877,2882 **** I don't remember exactly everythingbut my conclusion was that there was some bug in compiler.

more hot questions question feed lang-c about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Anyone Understand how the chain rule was applied here? Hot Network Questions Are leet passwords easily crackable? It is GCC extension. > > Thomas, can you check build with EXTRA_CFLAG='-Wunused-value'. > > You mean EXTRA_CFLAGS (with a S). > It fails in many locations. > What's your point?

In other case it is computingsome value calling memcpy or rte_ memcpy and you should at leastexplicitly throw it away by casting to void. How should I deal with a difficult group and a DM that doesn't help? What kind of distribution is this? You're incrementing the value, not the pointer.

Replaced char* p with char** p and changed p++ into *p++; was expecting (*p)++, but this answer straightened me out. Create a wire coil Radius of Convergence of Infinite Series Is there any job that can't be automated? Do you to support -Wunused-value?--Thomas Wodkowski, PawelX 2014-12-15 13:47:57 UTC PermalinkRaw Message -----Original Message-----Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 2:27 PMTo: Wodkowski, PawelXSubject: Re: [dpdk-dev] error: value computed is not usedPost by I only run build process and it pass.Patch proposal will be sent in a while.Post by Thomas MonjalonPlease Pawel, could you send a proper patch quickly?If nobody disagree, it'll be merged

Dec 20, 2002 Posts: 7524 View posts Location: Dresden, Germany #2 Posted by dl8dtl: Wed. current community chat Stack Overflow Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. In that case error is notproduced (I think this is a bug in compiler). The root cause is what?I've no idea about this.I got the same issue while ago.

The root cause is what?I've no idea about this.I got the same issue while ago. Why do train companies require two hours to deliver your ticket to the machine? In other words, there's a path through the function that doesn't result in a return getting called. If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why would he work at a glorified boarding school?

It's a bug.