failure/error response.should render_template Harkers Island North Carolina

Address New Bern, NC 28560
Phone (252) 633-0288
Website Link
Hours

failure/error response.should render_template Harkers Island, North Carolina

Is it appropriate to tell my coworker my mom passed away? Reload to refresh your session. Closed by 1c785d5. Star 1 Fork 0 rahulcn/.errors Created Oct 28, 2011 Embed What would you like to do?

Anyhow, I started with Test::Unit and quickly hated it. Please sign in or sign up to post. Check the else clause. Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system?

This might be the cleanest way to go, since Rails now has a lot of logic wrapped around the existence of templates. Embed Share Copy sharable URL for this gist. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. Our Company About Us Contact Us Community Treehouse Stories Student Perks Treehouse Blog Affiliate Program Careers Topics HTML CSS Design JavaScript Ruby PHP WordPress iOS Android Development Tools Business Tracks Web

I'm re-working the view isolation so that the template has to actually exist, but its content will not be evaluated. frankjmattia commented Jun 27, 2010 I don't know if it's really a concern, it could be that I just can't see the forrest for the trees... Regarding to the wiki I tried both methods described in the wiki but they only seem to work for the index and show method tests in my controllers. Security Patch SUPEE-8788 - Possible Problems?

smingins commented Dec 22, 2010 @dchelimsky - we are using 2.3.0 I just created a new clean project and generated some scaffold: rails generate scaffold post title:string body:text Then I added One is the redirects. For some reason errors are not being set or read or something, so just stub them and you're get the proper rendering. I tried the following test: describe Document do describe "POST create" do it "should not redirect to the new document" do Document.stub(:new).with({'these' => 'params'}) { mock_document(:save => false) } post :create,

def create if params[:friend_id] @friend = User.find_by_profile_name(params[:friend_id]) else end if @friend.profile_name != nil @user_friendship = current_user.user_friendships.new(friend: @friend) @user_friendship.save redirect_to profile_path(@friend.profile_name), status: 302 else flash[:error] = "Friend required!" redirect_to root_path, status: 302 Reload to refresh your session. Truth in numbers Replace lines matching a pattern with lines from another file in order Why is the spacesuit design so strange in Sunshine? Maybe I'm losing my vision.

Make space between rows constant Can an ATCo refuse to give service to an aircraft based on moral grounds? Option 1: it "should render a view" do response.should contain("I am the show view") # assuming the text is present in the view end Option 2: it "should render a view" I am currently comparing the two so as to actually fix the typo. asked 2 years ago viewed 1294 times active 2 years ago Visit Chat Related 77How to get rspec-2 to give the full trace associated with a test failure?40Using implicit `subject` with

Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Failure/Error: expect(response).to render_template(:new) up vote 0 down vote favorite What am I doing wrong? The application works as expected, but the specs are reporting: Failures: 1) Management::CountriesController POST create with invalid params re-renders the 'new' template Failure/Error: response.should render_template(:new) expecting <"new"> but rendering with <""> Am I missing something here?......yes, I probably am. Once I did that I had to start following edge for a lot of gems...

If you want to test that, please use the view specs. I've pasted it below. Also, in order to use methods such as contain in an rspec test, does a headless server such as capybara-webkit, or a headed sever such as the selinium-webdriver need to be We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox.

Does it matter which side up a seed is planted? We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox. if a POST renders something instead of redirecting). Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time.

Books for chess traps What is the most expensive item I could buy with £50? Raw .errors Failures: 1) MicropostsController POST 'create' failure should render the home page Failure/Error: response.should render_template('pages/home') expecting <"pages/home"> but rendering with <""> # ./spec/controllers/microposts_controller_spec.rb:38:in `block (4 levels) in ' 2) Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Coding Daily Answers to my own coding problems Skip to content HomeAbout ← Test a gem with the Rails 3stack Rails + Kaminari withRSpec → Rails + Devise andRspec Posted on

How do investigators always know the logged flight time of the pilots? Players stopping other player actions What sense of "hack" is involved in five hacks for using coffee filters? In which case, in a controller spec, does response.should render_template('show') Mean a request to this controller should render a view named show.html.erb? Or, I've hit my wall (been at this quite a while with very little sleep).

It was just that RSpec did a ton of monkey patching of internals to get the isolation it wants. RSpec member dchelimsky commented Dec 22, 2010 Ugh! end end If you change that to the following, everything works: def mock_post(stubs={}) @mock_post ||= mock_model(Post, stubs).as_null_object end Need to rethink the solution to this. Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no longer supports old versions of Firefox.

Sounds quite acceptable to me. It should work, but it refused to. But wouldn't this now require a developer to think about views before they're being tested? James Kirkpatrick 15,831 Points James Kirkpatrick James Kirkpatrick 15,831 Points >1y ago Duhhh.....Just saw it.

jan0sch closed this Oct 10, 2011 Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 111 Star 3,028 Fork 605 rspec/rspec-rails Code Issues 41 Pull requests 7 Projects Response code == 200 and nothing unusual in the logs. I use a user model that can hold several roles.

We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox. All gists GitHub Sign up for a GitHub account Sign in Create a gist now Instantly share code, notes, As you can imagine, I well acquainted with every commit breaking something or another. It's also the fact that to even get the isolation we had before and still be able to exploit new things in rails like respond_with would require that users write a We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox.

ruby-on-rails rspec share|improve this question edited Dec 8 '13 at 18:59 asked Dec 8 '13 at 18:35 Starkers 2,30583588 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 1