fsck error allocating block bitmap 4 memory allocation failed South Fallsburg New York

Hardware and Software issues!

Address 95 Hillside Ave, Monticello, NY 12701
Phone (845) 807-8532
Website Link
Hours

fsck error allocating block bitmap 4 memory allocation failed South Fallsburg, New York

Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. I agree that the QNAP ecosystem has really improved, and I'm hopeful that their platform improves too. more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science Comment 2 Mike Hardy 2011-10-31 16:46:03 EDT I was leery too as I know swap can be encrypted or network and I don't have those dependency graphs in my head but

Those logs from the card itself would be really interesting right about now, since you mention the card acts quirky when checking/rebuilding the array. rm: cannot remove `/opt/ssods4/var/run/thttpd-ssods.pid': Read-only file system WARNING: rc.ssods ERROR: script /opt/ssods4/etc/init.d/K21thttpd-ssods failed. Message #17 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: [email protected] (Theodore Y. It may be time to let this one go ;) Comment 14 Mike Hardy 2011-11-08 12:01:43 EST Agreed - I'm happy closing this one knowing it's been thought about and shouldn't

Find More Posts by arfon 05-09-2006, 03:50 PM #2 Xolo Member Registered: Jul 2004 Location: The Netherlands Distribution: Mandrake, Knoppix, Coyote Linux, RedHat Posts: 354 Blog Entries: 3 Rep: DD-WRT and an external 1TB USB drive (as a highlight of an extreme version of the problem). I booted with a boot CD and when I manually run fsck.ext3, it barfs with the following error: "Error allocating inode bitmap (2): Memory allocation failed"
"e2fsk aborted" Any idea what This may take a while...

arfon View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Visit arfon's homepage! Media was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. I have been using a similar article on the TS-209 for YEARS to fix my corruption issues. Why don't Mistborn and Mistings get drunk/poisoned because of the alcohol?

The eSATA seems positively snappy after that. Having a problem logging in? ext4 or xfs could host it. Just in time too because I'm starting to hit problems that were not addressed in the old article.

I found that e2fsck was running extremely slowly, much more than predicted by Ted. Browse other questions tagged linux debian memory ext3 fsck or ask your own question. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the I can't explain why, but like you, my problems in this area have gotten worse over the years.

I have a non-prod machine to do it with and am very comfortable with manual rpm installation etc as well as collecting stats if needed from a fsck while it's running This sort of mismatch seems likely to appear more frequently as it seems data grows faster than RAM capacity as a trend. Debian bug tracking system administrator . arfon View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Visit arfon's homepage!

Insert a USB stick with more than 3GB of space. Join our community today! I don't have anything else to offer though so I'll butt out otherwise. Running "tune2fs" returns that filesystem is in EXT3_ERROR_FS state, "clean with errors": # tune2fs -l /dev/sda4 tune2fs 1.40.10 (21-May-2008) Filesystem volume name: Last mounted on: Filesystem UUID: 7701b70e-f776-417b-bf31-3693dba56f86

Somehow trigger boot-time fsck for the filesystem (set /forcefsck or use tune2fs to trigger after each mount) 3. Ts'o): Bug#509529; Package e2fsprogs. (Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:12:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Ts'o ; Source for e2fsprogs is src:e2fsprogs. Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam. trying backup blocks... > Media was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Error allocating block bitmap (1): Memory allocation failed > e2fsck: aborted When I run fsck.ext3 in forced check, I get the: Error allocating inode bitmap (2): Memory allocation failed
e2fsk aborted Which is what I need to fix... I just booted off of my Slackware disk and then set the Mount Count up to 50.

I've been a lot happier with the 639 since I rebuilt it, but I'm only running 6 * 2TB drives in that, so haven't had the opportunity to push the limits Got a Knoppix cd lying around? Once you've fixed your filesystem issues, you'll want to disable the swap file on the stick, remount the volume and restart your services. [/] # swapoff /share/external/sdi1/myswapfile [/] # mount /dev/md0 linux debian memory ext3 fsck share|improve this question asked May 17 '09 at 22:10 TimB 1,17521116 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 10 down vote accepted

This may take a while... e2fsck will run SLLOOOOWWWWWWW, but at least it'll complete. Find More Posts by arfon 05-10-2006, 01:54 PM #4 Xolo Member Registered: Jul 2004 Location: The Netherlands Distribution: Mandrake, Knoppix, Coyote Linux, RedHat Posts: 354 Blog Entries: 3 Rep: Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

Ts'o). (Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:12:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. One VM is a fileserver in which we were copying 5Gb of data to (largest file: 200mb). Having a problem installing a new program? I must admit that my problems started when I completely rebuilt my NAS with 4TB WD SE blue drives.

If not I could see how that's an important enough property on a 4TB filesystem to warrant re-doing it even with the long turnaround times here. Errno is 8]; ]")9) e2fsck /dev/sda3e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)e2fsck: Device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/sda3Filesystem mounted or opened exclusively by another program?any advice (especially 9) would be very much Digital Diversity Are there any rules or guidelines about designing a flag?