Address 104 Foxhurst Rd, Oceanside, NY 11572 (516) 665-2204 http://www.lanlabs.com

# experiment 1 experimental uncertainty error and data analysis answers East Norwich, New York

Also, when taking a series of measurements, sometimes one value appears "out of line". We form a new data set of format {philips, cor2}. If we have two variables, say x and y, and want to combine them to form a new variable, we want the error in the combination to preserve this probability. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis (University Science Books, 1982) In addition, there is a web document written by the author of EDA that is used to teach this topic to

Each data point consists of {value, error} pairs. If you want or need to know the voltage better than that, there are two alternatives: use a better, more expensive voltmeter to take the measurement or calibrate the existing meter. Company News Events About Wolfram Careers Contact Connect Wolfram Community Wolfram Blog Newsletter © 2016 Wolfram. Rule 2: Addition and Subtraction If z = x + y or z = x - y then z Quadrature[x, y] In words, the error in z is the quadrature of

In[12]:= Out[12]= To form a power, say, we might be tempted to just do The reason why this is wrong is that we are assuming that the errors in the two There is virtually no case in the experimental physical sciences where the correct error analysis is to compare the result with a number in some book. We close with two points: 1. In[5]:= In[6]:= We calculate the pressure times the volume.

Say you are measuring the time for a pendulum to undergo 20 oscillations and you repeat the measurement five times. The quantity called is usually called "the standard error of the sample mean" (or the "standard deviation of the sample mean"). After he recovered his composure, Gauss made a histogram of the results of a particular measurement and discovered the famous Gaussian or bell-shaped curve. Another advantage of these constructs is that the rules built into EDA know how to combine data with constants.

This may be rewritten. The correct procedure here is given by Rule 3 as previously discussed, which we rewrite. In[42]:= Out[42]= Note that presenting this result without significant figure adjustment makes no sense. In[29]:= Out[29]= In[30]:= Out[30]= In[31]:= Out[31]= The Data and Datum constructs provide "automatic" error propagation for multiplication, division, addition, subtraction, and raising to a power.

Further, any physical measure such as g can only be determined by means of an experiment, and since a perfect experimental apparatus does not exist, it is impossible even in principle In[39]:= In[40]:= Out[40]= This makes PlusMinus different than Datum. We shall use x and y below to avoid overwriting the symbols p and v. Generated Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:56:19 GMT by s_wx1131 (squid/3.5.20) ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL: http://0.0.0.8/ Connection

Many people's first introduction to this shape is the grade distribution for a course. There is no fixed rule to answer the question: the person doing the measurement must guess how well he or she can read the instrument. Assume that four of these trials are within 0.1 seconds of each other, but the fifth trial differs from these by 1.4 seconds (i.e., more than three standard deviations away from In[18]:= Out[18]= AdjustSignificantFigures is discussed further in Section 3.3.1. 3.2.2 The Reading Error There is another type of error associated with a directly measured quantity, called the "reading error".

The following Hyperlink points to that document. For repeated measurements (case 2), the situation is a little different. An important and sometimes difficult question is whether the reading error of an instrument is "distributed randomly". Please try the request again.

They are named TimesWithError, PlusWithError, DivideWithError, SubtractWithError, and PowerWithError. Nonetheless, you may be justified in throwing it out. In[1]:= We can examine the differences between the readings either by dividing the Fluke results by the Philips or by subtracting the two values. And even Philips cannot take into account that maybe the last person to use the meter dropped it.

Wolfram Knowledgebase Curated computable knowledge powering Wolfram|Alpha. This is reasonable since if n = 1 we know we can't determine at all since with only one measurement we have no way of determining how closely a repeated measurement The choice of direction is made randomly for each move by, say, flipping a coin. Of course, everything in this section is related to the precision of the experiment.

In[6]:= Out[6]= We can guess, then, that for a Philips measurement of 6.50 V the appropriate correction factor is 0.11 ± 0.04 V, where the estimated error is a guess based Note that this assumes that the instrument has been properly engineered to round a reading correctly on the display. 3.2.3 "THE" Error So far, we have found two different errors associated In[35]:= In[36]:= Out[36]= We have seen that EDA typesets the Data and Datum constructs using ±. However, it was possible to estimate the reading of the micrometer between the divisions, and this was done in this example.

Here we discuss some guidelines on rejection of measurements; further information appears in Chapter 7. Of course, some experiments in the biological and life sciences are dominated by errors of accuracy. For example, if the half-width of the range equals one standard deviation, then the probability is about 68% that over repeated experimentation the true mean will fall within the range; if In[44]:= Out[44]= The point is that these rules of statistics are only a rough guide and in a situation like this example where they probably don't apply, don't be afraid to

Nonetheless, our experience is that for beginners an iterative approach to this material works best. The 0.01 g is the reading error of the balance, and is about as good as you can read that particular piece of equipment. By declaring lists of {value, error} pairs to be of type Data, propagation of errors is handled automatically. Support FAQ Wolfram Community Contact Support Premium Support Premier Service Technical Services All Support & Learning » Company About Company Background Wolfram Blog News Events Contact Us Work with Us Careers

In[3]:= In[4]:= Out[4]= In[5]:= Out[5]= The second set of numbers is closer to the same value than the first set, so in this case adding a correction to the Philips measurement Your cache administrator is webmaster. In the diameter example being used in this section, the estimate of the standard deviation was found to be 0.00185 cm, while the reading error was only 0.0002 cm. Nonetheless, in this case it is probably reasonable to accept the manufacturer's claimed accuracy and take the measured voltage to be 6.5 ± 0.3 V.

This is exactly the result obtained by combining the errors in quadrature.