exchange 2010 error 550 Diamond Point New York

Address Lake George, NY 12845
Phone (518) 668-5223
Website Link http://www.computermansite.com
Hours

exchange 2010 error 550 Diamond Point, New York

Any ideas on how to get internal users seeing the same Display Name and not the reply email address Many Thanks Reply Paul Cunningham says January 28, 2012 at 9:16 pm By subscribing to our newsletters you agree to the terms of our privacy policy Featured Product MSExchange.org Sections Anti Spam Section Articles & Tutorials Blogs Exchange Server News Hardware KBase Tips Though its not a very pretty picture if one needs to build several receive connectors. regard Robert Reply Tim Pillay says June 15, 2011 at 7:42 pm we needed a 3rd party app that worked fine with relay on ex2003 but ex2010 kept giving us 5.7.1

thanks ….quality guide/faq ! All rights reserved. Share to: Posted by Amanda Lakai Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

Newer Post Older Post Home Popular Posts How to solve Exchange SMTP server error '5.7.1 Unable to Relay'? I created a new connector per the instructions, but I still get 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay.

The Exchange Server and Zen Cart are on the same machine so they share the same NAT IP address (the public IP address is stored at the router). In the Local IP address should that be the IP address of the server or leaving it at All Available IPv4 (only one IP address assigned to the NIC) and should NovakPlease remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. Thanks Andrew Reply Ahmed says November 17, 2013 at 10:08 pm Hi Paul, I am having exchange 2010 SP3 and I have configured the receive connector relay as well as give

Thak worked for me. Reply Paul Cunningham says September 3, 2012 at 10:09 pm To receive email from external sources such as Hotmail and Yahoo on a Hub Transport server you need to have that The third connector has all IPv4 with all IP addresses, authen TLS, and perm anon. Find Paul on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.

Thanks Reply Jeremy Martin says April 30, 2013 at 3:41 am Hi Paul, I came across your article here and am wondering if you could help I'm having an issue properly Solved Exchange 2010 SMTP response Server error: '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay' Posted on 2010-06-10 Email Protocols Exchange MS Forefront-ISA 2 Verified Solutions 2 Comments 8,055 Views Last Modified: 2013-11-30 Hi. Alternatively if you can setup your web app to use authenticated SMTP sessions you wouldn't need a new connector. The copier only tells us ‘mailbox unavailable' in it's log.

Finally, thanks to your article, our Reporting Server can send emails to external users through our main Exchange 2010 server!! All rights reserved.Newsletter|Contact Us|Privacy Statement|Terms of Use|Trademarks|Site Feedback TechNet Products IT Resources Downloads Training Support Products Windows Windows Server System Center Browser   Office Office 365 Exchange Server   SQL Server Make space between rows constant A better way to evaluate a certain determinant Truth in numbers How to solve the old 'gun on a spaceship' problem? I have already created a Receive connector as you have described to allow other application servers to relay mail.

Thanks W. I followed your instructions but it is not working. Exchange Servers is required for relay (eg an app or device relaying mail to an external domain via your server). Keep up the good work!!

Navigate to the Servers >> Certificates… Exchange Email Servers Advertise Here 769 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days. The remote network settings need to specify an IP range that will encompass the PC's that will be sending the emails (us DHCP reservations for the PC's if you want to After few hours of troubleshooting, found out it was actually due to the Group Type in AD. It depends on the NDRs you're seeing.

Reply David says December 23, 2011 at 8:05 pm With SP1 it works fine but when i change to SP2 i found this problem. For anyone who reads this later, the expected 220, actual 500 error was fixed by altering the authentication settings for the internet receive connector in exchange 2010. In such case you need to repair the corrupt database using utility Eseutil. Do you know how to solve it?

It is possible that the wrong Receive Connector is accepting the connections. So many of these articles are near impossible to follow. Reply Paul Cunningham says January 21, 2012 at 7:10 pm Hi Duane, you can turn on Protocol Logging and use the resulting log file to identify what is using the receive You say "Sharing IP's works but is not best pratice".

The second connector has All IPv6 and IPv4 with all IP addresses, authen for TLS, Basic, Offer Basic, and Integrated, and perm group for Anon, Exchange users and servers, and Legacy. Reply Christopher Hughes says April 13, 2013 at 1:13 am Sorry about that. Would being setup in this way cause an issue? MY problem solve after add "ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Recipient"permission on receive connector Get-ReceiveConnector -Identity "relay-xxx" |ADD-ADPermission -User "NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON" -ExtendedRights "ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Recipient" September 25, 2013 at 12:30 AM Anonymous said...

We have two CAS servers and have identicle settings so the intermitancy is not caused by that. Comment Submit Your Comment By clicking you are agreeing to Experts Exchange's Terms of Use. Is it "eĉ ne" or "ne eĉ"? You can run into problems if you start allowing entire IP subnets and they overlap with the IP addresses for Exchange servers within the org.

Any ideas how I would go about finding out what information is being passed to the receive connector? You don't have another Hub Transport that isn't also a DAG member? CodeTwo Exchange Migration Dell Migrator for GroupWise LepideMigrator for Exchange Metalogix Archive Migrator Mimecast Migration NETsec GALsync Netmail Migrator Priasoft Migration Suite for Exchange Stellar GroupWise to Exchange Migrator Other (please This allows our LAN clients to use their application to send messages through our exchange easily.

The disc we have is 2003 SP2. Protocol logging shows that i am hitting the right receive connector but destination is show 127.0.0.1!!! Reply Paul Cunningham says August 27, 2013 at 3:33 pm That should be fine. Thanks July 13, 2012 at 8:51 AM Anonymous said... ...

share|improve this answer edited Jan 23 '14 at 12:31 Ladadadada 18.9k43270 answered Jan 23 '14 at 11:27 Abubaker Sadiq 212 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote Please follow this If you can't find your own copy I suggest you start asking around your network of friends and colleagues, someone is bound to have a copy somewhere. After going through the configuration numerous times to verify I haven't made any mistakes, I realized that I wasn't anywhere closer to solving the problem. Hello Terence,My problem is that i'am not allowed to send anonymous, I have to use, for security reasons, TLS and Integrated Windows authentication and as permission group Exchange users.

what happens if you have a mix of authenticated and non-authenticaed servers that need to relay. I created a receive connector for the Linux server, but I am not sure if I configured it right. If you have servers/apps that can do basic auth then you can try configuring them to use the Client Receive Connector (runs on a different port) or configure a dedicated receive share|improve this answer answered Jun 18 '12 at 14:26 tparker 512 I was actually able to do both, looks like we were on the same track.

I get the error message " SMTP Error: The following recipients failed: [email protected]" I followed your great article on creating a new receive connector, and when it did not work I If you have this issue, try adding them until you get the one that fixes it for you. Any help will be appreciated. Comments Allen White says March 8, 2011 at 8:22 pm thanks, we set this up to allow the backup server to relay mail.

I misunderstood him the first time. Any ideas? Additional Details Unabled to determine SMTP capabilities. As always, use your own discretion with all advice here.