flash_erase input/output error Ojo Feliz New Mexico

DesertGate Internet delivers wireless technology of the future to help you succeed in business and education, and to help you enjoy the benefits of broadband service, all right here in Las Vegas, N.M! We offer wireless internet access at blazing speeds. It's easy to use, very reliable, no phone lines or internet accounts needed and it's more available than DSL! Our services include: • Business packages • Residential packages • Site surveys Call DesertGate Internet today and let us connect you to the world.

|Computer Installation|Business Internet|Business Services|Computer Repair|Broadband|Internet Installation|Technical Support|Technical Support

Address 118 Bridge St, Las Vegas, NM 87701
Phone (505) 454-8454
Website Link http://www.desertgatewireless.com

flash_erase input/output error Ojo Feliz, New Mexico

global debugfs flagYes, I guess option 1 is the best I think. Again care needs to betaken, as you may loose information about blocks that have gone bad throughwear. (The recent patch "mtd: nand: write BBM to OOB even with flash-based BBT"partly overcomes At present, Ihave to scrub the block in question, scrub the BBTs, and then reboot to force arescan/rebuild of the BBTs. (This is fairly simple to do, but does risk loosinginformation Perhaps moving it tosysfs might be cleaner?In any case, I will wait for advice from David and Artem before commencing. (Iam away next week, so it will have to wait until

Refernand_erase_nand() in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base/* Check if we have a bad block, we do not erase bad blocks! */if (nand_block_checkbad(mtd, ((loff_t) page)<page_shift, 0, allowbbt)) {pr_warn("%s: attempt to erase a bad block at page Image Name: Linux-3.0.35-2666-gbdde708 Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) Data Size: 3165516 Bytes = 3 MB Load Address: 10008000 Entry Point: 10008000 Verifying Checksum ... I add a new bug here blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/uclinux-dist/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6347&start=0QuoteReplyEditDelete2010-11-23 03:43:29 Re: MTD Partitions and flash_erase on BF527Bob Liu (CHINA)Message: 96127 I can't repeat this problem on 2010R1. MEMBBTWIPEThis could be a useful addition, since it avoids the need for the user tocalculate the offsets for the BBT blocks.However, I just have a slight concern about adding the now

Might have think about what happens when called on blocksreserved for the BBTs...First of all, implement only what you really need and can test. I'll poke around elsewhere in this forum and see what is suggested. timeout=60s (nowayout=1)Bluetooth: Virtual HCI driver ver 1.3Bluetooth: Generic Bluetooth USB driver ver 0.6usbcore: registered new interface driver btusbsdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driversdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossmanmmc0: SDHCI controller on platform I am happy to implement either approach, butI would be interested to learn others' views first.Cheers,Angus Artem Bityutskiy 2012-07-03 12:22:50 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Post by Angus CLARKPost by Artem BityutskiyPost by

I think it will be useful to someone Attached Files mtd_utils.rar - [Click for QR Code] (2.62 MB, 368 views) Quick Reply Reply The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to And it seems as a reasonable compromise.OTOH, adding a new ioctl makes sense as we're offering a functionalitythat didn't exist before.Anyways, I guess its up to David or Artem.1. Thanks again, Bodhi. The flash erases with no errors from U-boot, so I'm not concerned that the part or its connections are bad.

I have built and uploaded a newer u-boot version, but not officially released. done, booting the kernel.Linux version 3.0.35-2666-gbdde708 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.2 20110630 (prerelease) (Freescale MAD -- Linaro 2011.07 -- Built at 2011/08/10 09:20) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 16 14:34:30 CST Any help would be much appreciated! Without serial console, it is not possible to set the envs explicitly to allow booting with this u-boot version.

Warning: If for whatever reasons the steps above were not successful in booting for you, then you will need serial console to recover. The NAND flash is a Micron 512 MB part. If you did, plug in the USB drive, mount it to /tmp and get the listing of ls -latr /tmp/sda1/boot BTW, and you have not rebooted after you install u-boot image, I haven't created a custom board resource file yet, but I don't think that the serioal flash would affect anything since those partitions are created after the partitions on the parallel

Every time you run this command "grep -a --null-data U-Boot /dev/mtd0ro" , you will get a bunch of NAND errors like that. Please turn JavaScript back on and reload this page.More documents in Linux Forum Archive Where is this place located?EngineerZoneAll PlacesProcessors and DSPSoftware and Development ToolsLinux Distribution for BlackfinLinux Forum ArchiveLog in A new ioctl (MEMSCRUB?)2. Forgot your password?

Here is the situation. - The new u-boot image was flashed OK. Option 2 needs too much work.http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-October/032577.htmlThanks Brian for spotting this post.It made me rethink of the MEMSCRUB suggestion and notice it is somewhatlimited.I guess the main reason for erasing a block search plus search plus Forums Google Pixel XLGoogle PixelBLU R1 HDSamsung Galaxy Note 7OnePlus 3 Analysis Widgets, Icons and Wallpapers – Miles’ Top PicksFact Check: The HTC 10 Does not Actually I plugged in a random USB flash into the box, and those lines are staying at the bottom of dmesg, with 1830 timestamps.

That leavesinventing another IOCTL, or perhaps adding another file mode, which wouldachieve per-file-descriptor scope, if not per-erase-request.My approach was largely motivated by the desire not to change the existing ABI,and/or mtd-utils. As I said in the thread this worked fine in 3.0.7 and is now broken on the stable 3.2.21 Any ideas what might be causing this? We couldput some logic in the kernel, "if 'MEMBBSCRUB" on BBT blocks, do notupdate/rewrite BBTs", but I think this "policy" decision would be better handledin userspace.1. A new ioctl (MEMSCRUB?)2.

Discuss Fact Check: The HTC 10 Does not Actually have Phase-Detection AutofocusSamsung to Permanently Discontinue Production and Sales of Galaxy Note 7Samsung Sent us a “Note 7 Return Kit” with a I personally recompile to disable bad blocktables temporarily whenever I need to reset a flash-based BBT orunmark a "bad block." But this isn't always so easy for others I dealwith, so I understand that the nand system is being completely re-written and will be introduced 3.5 On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:48:43 PM UTC+12, lisarden wrote: I would stay on the stable All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms of Use of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations

Any help would be much appreciated! global debugfs flag[snip]Post by Brian NorrisI like the idea of an ioctl (option 1), since that does not requirerecompilation (even in the event that debugfs wasn't enabled) and canbe built into Yes, the last sector is reserved and unused by linux.With both the current trunk and latest 2009R1 branches I get the following while running flash_unlock:root:/> flash_unlock /dev/mtd1Could not unlock MTD device: Passed the MTD partition information from u-boot also works fine.QuoteReplyEditDelete2010-11-23 21:58:40 Re: MTD Partitions and flash_erase on BF527Bob Liu (CHINA)Message: 96147 Both on bf537-stamp and bf527-ezkit.Attachmentsconfig.config.pnormtd.zip8.9 KBconfig.linux.pnormtd.zip11.1 KBkernel .config.zip9.1 KBbugreport .tar.gz19.3

Would you consider it, or do youthink it's an overdesign, if we already accept the debugfs way?Yes, option 2 could be a good compromise. Is this doable?--Best Regards,Artem Bityutskiy-------------- next part --------------A non-text attachment was scrubbed...Name: signature.ascType: application/pgp-signatureSize: 836 bytesDesc: This is a digitally signed message partURL: Shmulik Ladkani 2012-06-01 11:04:45 UTC PermalinkRaw Message We couldput some logic in the kernel, "if 'MEMBBSCRUB" on BBT blocks, do notupdate/rewrite BBTs", but I think this "policy" decision would be better handledin userspace.Sounds like you need 2 separate Enabling the "allow erase bad blocks" option pererase request would certainly be a safer solution.

why stop mtd1 at 0x3e0000 ? And succesfully writing to flash (83%) but could not write to memory where is spl I think (maybe need special access to unlock it?) Or only solution is jtag? I have tried JFFS2, UBIFS and YAFFS2 but all experience the same issue - which makes me think that the issue is with the mtd driver. We do have a m25p128 serial flash instead of m25p16.

We couldput some logic in the kernel, "if 'MEMBBSCRUB" on BBT blocks, do notupdate/rewrite BBTs", but I think this "policy" decision would be better handledin userspace.At the risk of repeating the FORUMS HD Mini Android DevelopmentHD Mini GeneralHD Mini ROM DevelopmentHD Mini AccessoriesHD Mini Themes and Apps Remove All Ads from XDA Most Thanked ALL-TIME RECENT 7 For developers here is working So the area where the new envs suppose to be has no valid values.