form for path error Pompton Plains New Jersey

Address 151 W Passaic St, Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Phone (201) 909-3765
Website Link

form for path error Pompton Plains, New Jersey

How can I get the key to my professors lab? autodetect a path with either _create or _update affixes. The form has this markup before: And this after failing validation: Note that this only happens if I activate ahah in the form. RainLab.User registers some mail templates that are created after installation.

This really has me stumped. Contributors License MIT License. I'm writing here today not only because I'm desperate to find a cure to this rails issue (the workarounds I found didn't work) or a git example with a working app However, as explained in the link provided in this answer, form_for(@book) will take the path to be just "books_path", so I had to override the :url, writing "form_for(@book, :url => admin_books_path)",

This eager loads most of Rails and + # your application in memory, allowing both threaded web servers + # and those relying on copy on write to perform better. + The third (and final) element is then checked by Rails. Does chilli get milder with cooking? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up rails 3 - path error when using form_for on a resource up vote 1 down vote favorite In my rails project I'm

What a great answer. Here's an example: <%= bootstrap_form_tag url: '/subscribe' do |f| %> <%= f.email_field :email, value: '[email protected]' %> <%= f.submit %> <% end %> Form Helpers This gem wraps the following Rails form Read more: +gem 'jbuilder', '~> 2.0' +# bundle exec rake doc:rails generates the API under doc/api. +gem 'sdoc', '~> 0.4.0', group: :doc + +# Spring speeds up development by keeping One example would be to automatically add an asterisk to the end of the label: label.required:after { content:" *"; } The label required class is determined based on the definition of

form_for(@user, :url => {:param1 => "value1", :param2 => "value2"}) do |f| or form_for([@post, @comment], :url => {:param1 => "value1", :param2 => "value2"}) do |f| where param1 and param2 are not :controller It all works now. current community chat Stack Overflow Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. so I'm not quite sure how to do it shorter then this..

The solution was to tease apart the automagic behavior of the `#respond_with` method into its two response options for transformative actions - either render the page with errors or redirect due first and if it doesn't then try the singular option - I'll take a look at it. I can access the tab in the backend, but as soon as I choose to expand into any of the forms from the backend or choose New Form, it throws this it's not been saved to the database..

I am aware from the discussion that the fix will most likely not be an easy one, but I figured it could be helpful to have tests to demonstrate the issue, asked 4 years ago viewed 1379 times active 4 years ago Linked 1 Rails nested resource issue Related 90form_for with nested resources2How to get the form_for working for a nested resource You never need to work with it otherwise. zelig commented Jun 16, 2012 Surely this doesn't solve all problems but in the special case of nested AR resources, plurality can be reasonably guessed using model class associations, for others

pjg commented Oct 18, 2012 To anyone stumbling upon this issue, the workaround is quite simple. Log in or register to post comments Comment #8 iva2k CreditAttribution: iva2k commented October 8, 2011 at 6:29am See #591696: Problem with various AHAH forms and validation, and my core patch Also there's the issue of how to handle namespaces routes like admin - currently you use an array like [:admin, @user] so I'd like to be able to continue using that. For example, if @post is an existing record you wish to edit, you can create the form using <%= form_for @post do |f| %> ... <% end %> This behaves in

Rails calls this method and passes it arguments! jakevose commented Jul 17, 2012 Add me to the list of people who just lost a bunch of time trying to figure out the "right" way to work around this and Issue #1769 These failing tests were written in an attempt to demonstrate the issues discussed in #1789 related to attempting to use form_for with a singular resource. Delete RainLab.User plugin.

You should explicitly specify this route <%= form_for @subscription, url: subscription_path, :html => { class: 'form_dark' } do |f| %> share|improve this answer answered Jun 7 '12 at 21:26 cdesrosiers 6,97621429 The issue is ActionDispatch::Routing::PolymorphicRoutes#polymorphic_path not knowing if the route was defined as singular or not. If one has both a resource and resources defined for the same model they will have to state which one they want anyway (using the url option for example). Open in Desktop Download ZIP Find file Branch: master Switch branches/tags Branches Tags master multiple-checked-values nested_form_support Nothing to show v2.5.2 v2.5.1 v2.5.0 v2.4.0 v2.3.0 v2.2.0 v2.1.1 v2.1.0 v2.0.1 v2.0.0 v1.0.0 2.5.2

Some ORM systems do not use IDs on nested models so in this case you want to be able to disable the hidden id. protected $redirectAction; // A controller action to redirect to. ``` Cancel Update Your Reply relaxandwork — 1 year ago Thank you @breda ! Unfortunately, you've defined your routes in a funny way that don't play nice with this, but don't fear! Is 'if there's any' grammatical in this sentence?

Why did my electrician put metal plates wherever the stud is drilled through? By "persisted" I mean that it's an object that maps directly to a record in the database. Methods defined on the FormBuilder are used to generate fields bound to this model. Would love to peek onto your machine while you work if that's fine with you, so I learn and can help in upcoming ones!

Did Sputnik 1 have attitude control? What it does with this Array may seem like magic, but isn't really. Those properties that the `FormRequest` checks, are the redirection options you have. The only apparent way I can think of doing it is by creating a data structure that keeps a track of whether a set of routes is a singular resource and

I believe this is related to rails/rails#1769, which is called out in Below is a more detailed breakdown of what I am refering to: The ProfileRequest is a singular resource. Remote forms get the authenticity token from the meta tag, so embedding is unnecessary unless you support browsers without JavaScript. :remote - If set to true, will allow the Unobtrusive JavaScript So how does this work? Would be great to see a fix in an upcoming version - don't see any target milestone, so I presume it's not under active development at the moment ?

If we find none, we fall back to the plural as the status quo educated guess. By default this behavior is an ajax submit. :enforce_utf8 - If set to false, a hidden input with name utf8 is not output. :html - Optional HTML attributes for the form You have no Subscription controller in your app 2. What I am trying to achieve is redirect to an error page.

ex: protected $redirectRoute; // A route name to redirect to. assist. There is a plugin that clears the cache from backend: Install that plugin and clear the cache. But then what happens is special!