ftdisk error 57 server 2003 Crofton Nebraska

Address 2503 Fox Run Pkwy Ste 3, Yankton, SD 57078
Phone (605) 689-1724
Website Link

ftdisk error 57 server 2003 Crofton, Nebraska

Thank you for searching on this message; your search helps us identify those areas for which we need to provide more information. The matrix controllers can somewhat compensate by routing I/O to the other drive, but only a few requests. This video Micro Tutorial is a brief intro… Windows 10 Windows 7 Windows 8 Windows Vista Windows OS Advertise Here 771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past Chkdsk shows no errors on this drive.

Remove these devices so that drivers will be reinstalled in next connection. Getting Event IDs 57, 50, and 26 Want to Advertise Here? Please try to save this file elsewhere. Woudn't you think that would be useful info?

If anyone is still reading this thread, here is the latest. On Node B (not supposed to access drive) it does indeed give an error when you drill down into the folders which states: example: "F:\Folder\Folder2 is not accessible The requested resource I had to recover this using some HDD utilities. This is the same thing that was happening when the original drive was connected.

Getting Event IDs 57, 50, and 26 Posted on 2008-05-14 Storage Server Hardware Windows Server 2003 1 Verified Solution 3 Comments 6,238 Views Last Modified: 2013-11-14 Hello, I am in urgent This behavior is caused by a conflict between the NTFS file system and the cluster services driver component (Clusdisk) filter. Chkdsk was run with the scan/repair bad blocks. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885688 This behavior occurs when the cluster node computer starts.

The drive is new, formatted as NTFS, no autoruns, and works fine on all other PC's it is connected to. Please review my questions and comments and let me know how to proceed safely. The underlying cause is a corrupted file, which can be easily reset. Thanks again. 0 Message Author Comment by:Jsmply2010-06-16 Btw, the thread above keeps saying ghost, but it also is refering to symantec/veritas equievelents of the software. 0 Message Author Comment

The Intel drivers are up to date via Dell (this week) and the Windows utility is installed and showing the raid array is healthy. 0 Message Author Comment by:Jsmply2010-06-16 Okay Please try to save this file elsewhere. Get trending threat insights on hackers, exploits, and suspicious IP addresses delivered to your inbox with our free Cyber Daily. Running Chkdsk on every drive letter (there are 4) every time this event happens is just not possible, let alone having to restart the server.

Regardless it's pointing away from being the internal drives. 0 LVL 46 Overall: Level 46 Storage Hardware 23 Hardware 14 Windows 7 8 Message Active 1 day ago Assisted Solution There are also some known issues with several versions of the Matrix firmware & drivers, so go to the dell site (not Intel, because they won't have the firmware that matches Question, from the description, it does not sound like it will cause a problem does it? Heard it all.

And they usually occur at a rate of 1 every 16-21 minutes until the drive is "safely removed". If you want reliable data, get a reliable disk drive. Specifically what is make/model of RAID controller and make/model of disk drive(s). Then test if issue still exists.

Make sure you have a good backup and then try to run CHKDSK on all the system drives. Have also found a few machines that don't have the error. I got a warning source: ftdisk, category: disk, event ID 57, warning: failed to flush transaction log error..etcI checked out microsoft KB article about it http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885688 and it mentions "clustering" ....I based on 1.5 hrs, it is obvious the disk performed internal block recovery.

Connect with top rated Experts 9 Experts available now in Live! The drives are optimized for quick removal, but Norton Ghost seems to lock the drives in use when it's service is running. We are still getting the messages but the system is stable. 0 LVL 46 Overall: Level 46 Storage Hardware 23 Hardware 14 Windows 7 8 Message Active 1 day ago I did not try either of these yet.

Dell's diagnostics checked the raid controller and the hitachi internal drives. I noticed the device manager screen refresh and also noticed the power light on the drive turn off. Drive formatted as a single NTFS partition. Corruption may occur.

Privacy Policy Site Map Support Terms of Use Toggle navigation Skip to content Home Blog Course YT-Videos Vision Inside Windows Cluster Course PowerShell Course Contnet How to Fix Events 137 If the product or version you are looking for is not listed, you can use this search box to search TechNet, the Microsoft Knowledge Base, and TechNet Blogs for more information. I now believe this event may be happening due to a problem or design feature of the Seagate drive(s). Once back in june, last month and this month.

Example: Node A sees F:\ which is a SAN LUN (cluster resource is online here and it should be seen here) Node B sees F:\ which is the same SAN LUN The culprit was actually two-fold. This is the same thing that was happening when the original drive was connected. My reply: I'm not sure where to start "Device Management", but if you mean "Device Manager", when the drive is connected, it is listed under "Disk drives" and the right-click menu

This is one of the reasons.