ext3-fs error read_block_bitmap cannot read block bitmap Eminence Missouri

Address 2308 State Route WW, Mountain View, MO 65548
Phone (417) 554-1576
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error read_block_bitmap cannot read block bitmap Eminence, Missouri

I suspect that one of the drives (RAID 6 btw) has failed, but I'm not sure what to do from here. yes Inode 3000636, i_blocks is 367695678, should be 0. OK, booting the kernel. Not the answer you're looking for?

Amod Sutavane. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... MK Tags: vgcfgrestore View All (1) 0 Kudos Reply The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Where'd I put that spare hard disk? The read-only status is meant to help protect you from further data loss.Water over the proverbial dam now, but "fsck -f -y ..." is very dangerous to the health of your

Make space between rows constant Developing web applications for long lifespan (20+ years) more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising no /dev/sdb1 contains a file system with errors, check forced. Not the answer you're looking for? yes Group descriptor 4354 checksum is 0x1718, should be 0x0438.

This may take awhile ... PDA View Full Version : Possible hard disk issue? Illegal block #5 (1571405617) in inode 3000670. In /var/log/messages I see a zillion of these errors May 15 11:03:49 server kernel: [456268.101524] attempt to access beyond end of device May 15 11:03:49 server kernel: [456268.119604] sdb1: rw=0, want=486539272,

While copying the data, we got this message from time to time (on various files): "EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read inode block - inode=22561891, block=90243144. Last edited by cdtech; November 15th, 2008 at 07:41 AM. Edit: I see you tried running e2fsck already...... From: Vegard Svanberg To: ext3-users redhat com Subject: file system, kernel or hardware raid failure?

Join Date Oct 2008 Beans 323 DistroUbuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Re: [SOLVED] file system error in sda3 block bitmap not in group Hi, i got a similar problem. Thanks. Gotta run but this appears a competent description http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_resizing_ext3_partitions (dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdb1 # should show the current size, default in 4KB blocks). ---------- Post added 16th May 2011 at 01:25 AM Second: Look at this: How can I fix mounting my data drive after a crash?

Suddenly couple of days back i started getting the following errors on primary server continuously,,, attempt to access beyond end of device 93:00: rw=0, want=72220676, limit=72145328 EXT3-fs error (device drbd(147,0)): read_block_bitmap: Fix? CLEARED. Does the recent news of "ten times more galaxies" imply that there is correspondingly less dark matter?

CLEARED. I'll try the data recovery route as well while I don't have any other solutions. Any ideas? Maybe your Harddisk is dying.

yes One or more block group descriptor checksums are invalid. CLEARED. Marking this thread [SOLVED] for posterity. I have tried everything I can think of to get the volume mounted.

FIXED. ext3_abort called. stevea16th May 2011, 06:25 AMGood news - it doesn't look like a hardware error Bad news - it does look like a file-system error. yes Group descriptor 0 checksum is 0x761e, should be 0xcf25.

After I used dmesg command it is explained: db: Current: sense key=0x3 ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0 Info fld=0xa2fce10 end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 170905104 EXT3-fs error (device sdb2): read_block_bitmap: Cannot read block When smart says the disk is ok it's not necessary really ok. Apparently, in the end the file systems deteriorated so much that they became unusable. Is there a better way to do this?

The answer you refer to is regarding magic numbers, and that's not what I'm seeing - in fact that's one of several answers on askubuntu I looked at already. So far I have these questions/concerns: - Kernel bug? (This is Ubuntu 8.10 with 2.6.27-7-server) - Filesystem bug/failure? - Did the RAID controller fail to detect a failing drive? During this whole process I did loose some data but it was not that bad.--Mayank Top pschaff Retired Moderator Posts: 18276 Joined: 2006/12/13 20:15:34 Location: Tidewater, Virginia, North America Contact: Contact Top maksaraswat Posts: 44 Joined: 2011/10/14 19:00:52 Location: New York Contact: Contact maksaraswat Website Re: EXT3-fs error after running fsck Quote Postby maksaraswat » 2012/02/02 15:54:11 So I was able to

CLEARED. Is there a role with more responsibility? CLEARED. I've got a back-up using backuppc but stupidly I lost my rescue disks.

OK testdisk doesn't seem to offer much. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes [[email protected] ~># dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdb1 dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Filesystem volume name: Last mounted on: Filesystem UUID: 3bb5d091-05ff-412d-91a2-3f7ea9557163 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Find all posts by Neo #7 01-28-2009 ccj4467 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2009 Last Activity: 13 October 2016, 2:10 PM EDT Posts: 29 Thanks: 1 Thanked 1

It was suggested that I should: unmount drive, remove journal from filesystem using tune2sf, use e2fsck to scan drive and lastly recreate journal using tune2fs.