gcc error redefinition Walkerville Michigan

Address New Era, MI 49446
Phone (231) 855-9144
Website Link
Hours

gcc error redefinition Walkerville, Michigan

On 10.4.6, with Xcode >>> 2.3 installed, both gcc 3.3 and gcc 4.0 do not give this error. namespace ThirdParty1 { #include "ThirdParty1.h" } using namespace ThirdParty1; You can now use ThirdParty1::Byte and ::Byte. Am I using the #IFNDEF wrong? - C++ up vote 3 down vote favorite I am trying to implement my own OrderedList data structure using class templates. Linked 5 Why “Redefinition of typedef” error with GCC 4.3 but not GCC 4.6?

GCC 4.6 and later allow it as an extension (except for -pedantic-errors) in preparation for C1X standard, but that doesn't change anything on it being invalid in C89 and C99, so lmussier referenced this issue Jun 17, 2016 Closed [C][Linux][GCC 4.4.4] Another (new) typedef redefinition #637 lmussier commented Jun 17, 2016 @damonbarry Sorry I misspoke, the issue I'm talking about is redefining You should use https://github.com/CastXML/CastXML, which replaces gccxml and works with newer compilers). Already have an account?

Depending on where the third-party headers come from, how often they change, etc., you could just fix the problem once and not have to look at potentially fragile compiler workarounds. With the passing of Thai King Bhumibol, are there any customs/etiquette as a traveler I should be aware of? So it might be a good idea to give 4.1.2 a shot on your Fedora 18 machine. Can a GM prohibit a player from referencing spells in the handbook during combat?

share|improve this answer answered Mar 27 '13 at 15:03 Only You 1,5781526 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google How do I >>> get this >>>> sort of thing to compile with gcc? >>> >>> What version of the compiler are you using? of the atom whose 1s electron moves nearly at the speed of light? What sense of "hack" is involved in "five hacks for using coffee filters"?

share|improve this answer edited Mar 22 '13 at 13:00 answered Mar 22 '13 at 12:46 Mike 22.2k1262126 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote There is not enough information here c gcc share|improve this question edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:08 Zaffy 8,93442662 asked Mar 5 '13 at 11:20 ant2009 68186243394 1 Yes, different compilers/versions/flags might produce different results, esp. Is the NHS wrong about passwords? Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time.

I doubt the issue is the version of gcc. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Show that a nonabelian group must have at least five distinct elements With the passing of Thai King Bhumibol, are there any customs/etiquette as a traveler I should be aware of?

Not the answer you're looking for? This error occurs (obviously) when the compiler encounters two different declarations for the same name. reading through the definition of `\cfrac` in AMSMath How to limit a xorg installation to a single video driver? Linked 33 Why should the implementation and the declaration of a template class be in the same header file?

Maybe it helps you. … -- Petr rohan565singh commented Jun 15, 2016 Hey, Thanks for the reply. The error reads "redefinition of FUNCTION_NAME FUNTION_NAME previously declared here". I have attached the toplevel.c and toplevel.h files in which the patch has been applied. (.c and .h have been converted to txt for upload) They seems to be patched correctly. Your CFLAG defines mean absolutely nothing without that. –technosaurus Mar 25 '13 at 7:09 add a comment| 6 Answers 6 active oldest votes up vote 4 down vote accepted +250 That's

You signed out in another tab or window. My system is running 32 bit Ubuntu 16.04 I don't know mutch about gccxml. For templates, stick the implementation inside the header file just below the class definition. –keelerjr12 Apr 15 '12 at 20:04 @keelerjr12 I think that's a matter of taste where Microsoft Azure member damonbarry commented Jun 13, 2016 We merge develop into dmpreview on a regular basis (once every week or two).

In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations? There's nothing wrong with using #include on your .cpp file in order to do this, however your .cpp file will also need header guards (i.e. #ifndef MYORDEREDLIST_CPP etc). Compute the kangaroo sequence 5008 out of the box Make all the statements true With modern technology, is it possible to permanently stay in sunlight, without going into space? share|improve this answer edited Mar 22 '13 at 17:10 answered Mar 22 '13 at 17:02 Gene 29.8k32757 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote This is not a question to

The actual situation is a bit more complicated: there >>> are about a dozen types (UInt8 and similar) that are being defined in >>> both a system header and a third-party Walker Re: Making GCC less sensitive about duplicate typedefs? Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. The usual approach however is simply to shove everything into the same .h file Note - template classes/functions are the only time you should ever need to #include a .cpp file

What do I do when two squares are equally valid? How should I calculate the determinant? Browse other questions tagged c gcc or ask your own question. How do I get this sort of thing to compile with gcc?

Which means you can just drop the typedef in the source and it should be OK. CPP_W_BUILTIN_MACRO_REDEFINED : CPP_W_NONE; 2998 bool warned; 2999 3000 warned = cpp_pedwarning_with_line (pfile, reason, 3001 pfile->directive_line, 0, 3002 "\"%s\" redefined", 3003 NODE_NAME (node)); 3004 3005 if (warned && node->type == NT_MACRO && Thanks a lot for the input, next time I'll do more homework before opening a bug. We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox.

I must assume that one or both of these files are in libraries you are using.