ext3-fs error device dm-0 in ext3_dirty_inode io failure Elm Hall Michigan

Address 108 S Main St, Crystal, MI 48818
Phone (989) 584-4600
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error device dm-0 in ext3_dirty_inode io failure Elm Hall, Michigan

Our script every day will create directory (datemonth format) and will move all those files into that directory OS: Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 AS Kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 Server: ibm x3950 model Storage: New Partion with size of 340GB, testscript with 200mb files. No luck. Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced.

I cannot find a way to reproduce, it just happens after a while... Share this post:TwitterGoogleLinkedInRedditEmailPrintTagged With: command line, emergency, filesystem Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address Cancel Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4. So ext4_forget() should be called inside ext4_free_blocks() to avoid this problem.

All product names are trademarks of their respective companies. FIXED. /dev/ram0: Inode 73980, i_size is 434176, should be 437248. Status: CLOSED ERRATA Aliases: None Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Classification: Red Hat Component: kernel (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Storage Multiple Devices (MD) Device Mapper Core Crypt Multipath caused by kernel crash, because kernel crash losts "cached/buffered" ext3 operations) case2) by hardware troubles. (e.g.

I suspect that one of the drives (RAID 6 btw) has failed, but I'm not sure what to do from here. When intentionally stimulate the problem will not occur the incident. FIXED. /dev/ram2: Inode 4032, i_size is 868310, should be 1138688. bug #476533 reports this should be fixed in 78.0.14.EL so perhaps there is yet another root cause if it's the exact same problem. (In reply to comment #7) > Verified on

Sense: Internal target failureend_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 3025928274JBD: recovery failedEXT3-fs: error loading journal.After analyzing the situation and some Googling I found out that I should do a file system http://sr5tech.com/write_back_cache_experiments.htm Renan Teston InĂ¡cio (zerocaronte) wrote on 2009-07-24: #29 If I understood correctly, disabling write back cache must be done on the device (ie disk). have no idea who our support contact is. fails on ext2, blocksizes 1024, 2048, 4096, when mounted on a ramdisk (ram0) using the new brd driver (part of rhel 5.4). 3.

FIXED. /dev/ram0: Inode 70541, i_size is 380928, should be 382976. That's why we'd like a new bug to track this seemingly distinct problem. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x82) Offline data collection activity was Maybe you can reproduce it in the same way?

You can calculate with same data loss as well, although don't have any real fear from such cryptic error messages, even if there are so many. Error appears after 2 months of testing. About two > month ago I noticed that the filesystem was remounted ro. My CEO wants permanent access to every employee's emails.

First I split the raid in two partitions and run mkfs.ext3 -c for badblocks. Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote on 2008-08-29: #3 The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. Here is the lines in /var/log/message May 27 02:31:16 hostname kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sdh): ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 3918926 in dir #5570561 May 27 02:31:16 hostname kernel: Aborting journal on device Home | Invite Peers | More Linux Groups Your account is ready.

What/where/how would you like it opened? I know 2.6.24-15 was recently released. White Papers & Webcasts VMware EVO-Rail Hyper Converged Infrastructure Appliance Concur SMB Expense Policy Template The State Of Endpoint Security Adoption 2014 To 2015 Blog Articles Ubuntu & Vista: Searching for Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Bug attachments lspci_dmesg.log (edit) Add attachment Remote bug watches debbugs #497562 [done normal] Edit redhat-bugs #460179 Edit redhat-bugs #476533 [CLOSED ERRATA] Edit

Comment 87 Lachlan McIlroy 2011-04-20 22:24:34 EDT Eric, you mentioned the following commits - do you still think we may need them? 40389687382bf0ae71458e7c0f828137a438a956 86963918965eb8fe0c8ae009e7c1b4c630f533d5 Comment 88 Eric Sandeen 2011-04-20 22:55:35 EDT No errors in dmesg. 1. Something should probably this filesystem periodically overwrite on the block level, OR there is an ext3 bug which happens only on this fs. Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote on 2009-01-17: #4 *This is an automated response* This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the previous request for information.

Jaunty's linux/fs/buffer.c::void unlock_buffer is : { clear_bit_unlock(BH_Lock, &bh->b_state); smp_mb__after_clear_bit(); wake_up_bit(&bh->b_state, BH_Lock); Information from Red Hat: * http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0331.html * => https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476533 (published info, link from RHSA-2009:0331-14) * => https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460179 (this is Red The testscript with 10mb file is now running for several hours without any problems on the sata raid partition. Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote on 2009-06-19: #20 From a few comments here it seems this should be resolved with a 2.6.29 or newer kernel. When we removing files the storage file system (/dev/sdc14) becomes READ ONLY. (Aborting Journal) This incident not occur every time, frequently monthly once or two months once will occur, when we

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Jaunty): status: Incomplete → Won't Fix Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2013-06-04 Changed in linux-2.6 (Debian): status: New → Fix Released See full activity log To post EXT3 file system remoting read only (Journal Aborting) sanjay a asked May 20, 2008 | Replies (1) Hi Admins, Since 6 months Im facing strange problem with our two IBM x3950 FIXED. /dev/ram0: Inode 70462, i_size is 0, should be 72704. Here is the lines in /var/log/message > > > > > > May 27 02:31:16 hostname kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sdh): ext3_lookup: > > unlinked inode 3918926 in dir #5570561 >

after a while i got errors (around 130gb were on th partition) : attempt to access beyond end of device sda1: rw=0, want=3151373440, limit=1464846304 attempt to access beyond end of device Note that 2.6.29-rc1 also fixes it, if you want to check an earlier version. Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled. As a result I'm marking the actively developer "linux (Ubuntu)" task as Fix Released bug I've also gone ahead and opened a Jaunty nomination in the case where we can isolate

dmesg: [ 38.907730] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 284688831 [ 38.907802] EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): read_block_bitmap: Cannot = read block bitmap - block_group =3D 1086, block_bitmap =3D 35586048 [ 38.907956] Apparently, in the end the file systems deteriorated so much that they became unusable.