ext2-fs error ext2_readdir bad page in Evart Michigan

We Believe In Educating as well as Servicing our Community. Our Certified Staff specialize in Computer Services, Sales, & Part Supplies. Web Design and 1st page placement in your favorite search engines such as (Google, Yahoo, and Bing). We can help you make your office Paperless and more efficient by creating shares to simplify your administration. We can Build Custom Computers built for Kids ( with Parental controls ) to keep them off where ever you want, Business Computers, Production, and Gaming Consoles that exceed Alienware Specs. We also offer Social Media Marketing Campaigns, Free Seminars, Free Estimates, Free Optimization Reports on your site. Tips for keeping your Computer Optimal.

We offer Computer Repair, Web Design, Web Hosting, Laptop & Desktop Service, SEO Services, Computer Upgrades, Virus Removal, Backlinks, Web Analytics, Keyword Research, Paperless File Systems, Data Recovery, Cell Phone Repair, Wireless Networks, Business Servers, Data Sharing, File Encryption, Domain Name Service, Programs, and Wired Networks. At ION Computer Systems our Certified Staff are here to help. With over 20 years of experience we offer a quality service for affordable prices. Free Estimates. Remote Support Services. System Optimization too. Are you tired off getting ripped off by Computer Companies, Losing your Data, and Poor Service, Contact us today. We work for you. Don't work for computer Companies that over charge you for simple things. We know your time is valuable. Get the Service you deserve at prices you can afford at ION Computer Systems.

Address 617 S Chestnut St, Reed City, MI 49677
Phone (231) 465-4189
Website Link http://www.ioncomputersystems.com
Hours

ext2-fs error ext2_readdir bad page in Evart, Michigan

See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings) Log in or register to post comments Iulian Vaideanu Thu, 02/19/2015 - 04:22 No, it shouldn't - I just I've gone ahead and recreated the RAID container, the disk label, partition, and filesystem. Also the cylinder boundary endings don't look a happy sight. Or they will only operate for a brief period at boot time or for a short time after.

Isn't this destructive? I will agree, the RAID card is likely to blame here in some aspect. It is an ext4 volume, but it apparently let me mount it ext2(?), and I totally didn't catch it. smartctl -t short /dev/your-device Wait 5 mins and then run the long test.

kung fu buntuJune 18th, 2009, 03:12 AMI got home from work and while using the computer I tried to copy one file from one HDD to another, but cp returned an The configuration in fstab is hosed up and pointing to a non-existent device. Comment 2 Eric Sandeen 2010-04-23 11:47:03 EDT > Syslog output: > Apr 22 23:12:15 r42sgao kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sdk1): ext2_check_page: > bad entry in directory #22324902: rec_len is s > Happy to help here, but please keep in mind that ext4 in 5.5 is tech preview so we do not recommend using it for production work loads.

I could swear /dev/hdg existed and when I unmounted it it never was mountable again. Regards. As I say, I won't say the others are wrong, but usually a hard disk problems show themselves in really obvious ways so there is no question about it. Thunar uses gnome-mount to mount the partitions, this might be a problem with gnome-mount.

Pulp is installed frugally on /dev/hda7. PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset. Buffer I/O error on device hdg2, logical block 0 lost page write due to I/O error on hdg2 EXT2-fs error (device hdg2): read_inode_bitmap: Cannot read inode bitmap - block_group = 0, I'll try creating an ext4 fs under rhel5 with the same geometry as above, and then run tune4fs to see if somehow that lost the extra features...

The time now is 05:46 AM. Is that something that can be tried while the router is operational? Thanks, -Eric Comment 22 Eric Sandeen 2011-05-05 15:35:42 EDT Closing based on no answer to the needinfo. Search form Search Search WAN, Routing and Switching Cisco Support Community Cisco.com Search Language: EnglishEnglish 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish) Português (Portuguese) Pусский (Russian) 简体中文 (Chinese) Contact Us Help Follow Us

Right now, I'm in the process of moving roughly 5 or 6TB of data with an extremely large number of small files (~1kb) to an ext4 fs using rsync, and after I have tried: #e2fsck /dev/sdc1 e2fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008) Resize inode not valid. The following errors are typical of the problem: %IOSXE-2-PLATFORM:kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sda1): ext2_readdir: bad page in #2 %IOSXE-2-PLATFORM:kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sda1): ext2_readdir: bad page in #2 %IOSXE-2-PLATFORM:kernel: EXT2-fs error All rights reserved.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Search this Thread 11-28-2006, 01:49 PM #1 keysorsoze Member Registered: Apr 2004 Location: Queens, NY Distribution: Red Hat, Solaris Posts: 295 Will it interfere with the router and stop it forwarding? smartctl -a /dev/hda smartctl -a /dev/hdb smartctl -a /dev/hdc smartctl -a /dev/hdd smartctl -a /dev/hdg smartctl -a /dev/hdh I don't understand where the problem is... See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings) Log in or register to post comments enseibert Fri, 02/20/2015 - 03:20 Thanks for that, however it does look

More or less, the controller was faulting, causing it to reset and the RAID to be marked as inoperable. Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else • Take the tour • Read the guide © 2004-2016 CanonicalLtd. • Terms of use • Contact Launchpad Support • Blog See my previous post and follow what I said. hmm ok...

meetscott View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Visit meetscott's homepage! Fix? Language: EnglishEnglish 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish) Português (Portuguese) Pусский (Russian) 简体中文 (Chinese) Contact Us Help Follow Us Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Newsletter Instagram YouTube ASR1004 kernel error message Unanswered Question In any case, back to the original report, I'd say a check to make sure ext2 isn't trying to mount huge filesystems that it will fail with would be nice, but

HGeneAnthony General 1 11-23-2004 01:37 AM Failing hard drive--need to copy Phathead Linux - Hardware 2 03-10-2004 12:59 PM All times are GMT -5. You gleaned no new or useful information from that exercise with smartctl. /dev/md0 is a virtual drive, not a physical device. I thought this was ext4? I don't know any other way to change the ID but fdisk and then put a new fs on it.

I try to ls the mountpoint contents as root and I get a "total 0". Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA Aliases: None Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Classification: Red Hat Component: kernel (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Storage Multiple Devices (MD) Device Mapper Core Crypt Multipath Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. I'm somewhere between confused and concerned. :) Anything else weird in between mkfs & now?

Recreate? keysorsoze View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Visit keysorsoze's homepage! See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings) Log in or register to post comments enseibert Thu, 02/19/2015 - 08:02 I did and it produced an error Find More Posts by meetscott 11-28-2006, 02:55 PM #3 keysorsoze Member Registered: Apr 2004 Location: Queens, NY Distribution: Red Hat, Solaris Posts: 295 Original Poster Rep: Would I edit

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary From what I think is the issue /dev/md0 is some type of RAID and /dev/hde a and /dev/hdg are now no longer mountable Report a bug This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. Hence my desire to first try a "read only" approach before hammering it with fsck.

Even if you were using raid, it doesn't have to have a valid partition table. I get this on boot up: Quote: EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended EXT2-fs error (device sdb4): ext2_check_page: bad yes     /dev/bootflash1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** /dev/bootflash1: 49/166144 files (6.1% non-contiguous), 143933/332231 blocks fsck completed with no errors   fsck of bootflash: complete router# See More 1