ext3 fs error block bitmap for group not in group Fishing Creek Maryland

Address 22685 Three Notch Rd, California, MD 20619
Phone (301) 863-1212
Website Link http://www.issi-md.com

ext3 fs error block bitmap for group not in group Fishing Creek, Maryland

Both > of my (ext3) containers are showing the same problem. Obviously you need to be sure the partition is correct but it seems pretty good looking at the parted output (as it matches the sizes in your opening-post) Offline #5 2013-11-30 What happened to Arch's KISS? no Group descriptor 265 checksum is 0xbbb8, should be 0xb870.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. How do I help minimize interruptions during group meetings as a student? systemd sure is stupid but I must have missed the simple part ...... no Group descriptor 267 checksum is 0x72bb, should be 0xc66c.

Block bitmap for group 30533 is not in group. (block 1000532368) Relocate? FIXED. I'd try the other alternative superblock locations to see if better files come from it Offline #13 2013-12-04 22:10:33 mr.MikyMaus Member From: +3600 UT Registered: 2006-03-31 Posts: 270 Re: [solved] How CLEARED.

Block bitmap for group 267 is not in group. (block 1968099309) Relocate? Send a report that this bug log contains spam. After that it asked me two questions about reallocation, to both of which I had answered "yes". If you want to use a different superblock, you must repair the filesystem with fsck giving it a -b parameter with another superblock.

I believe this option is v share|improve this answer edited Mar 13 '13 at 0:40 answered Mar 12 '13 at 23:23 cinelli 909412 fsck.ext3 -pcf complained about the -p No further changes may be made. I missed that:$ sudo dumpe2fs /dev/sdb1 | grep superblock dumpe2fs 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) dumpe2fs: Invalid argument while reading journal super blockI already tried that before, but didn't mention in my first post yes /dev/sda1 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.

The flags used will tell fsck.ext3 to behave as follows: -p, Automatic repair (no questions) -c, Check for bad blocks and add them to the badblock list -f Force checking even Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical © Canonical Ltd. Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: David Simpson To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: cryptsetup: Error mounting device: EXT3-fs: group descriptors corrupted Date: Sun, 25 asked 3 years ago viewed 1164 times active 11 days ago Related 2Change Partition Table with GParted2Resize partitions with gparted1Disk problems prevent me from booting, or set the disk to read-only.

Fix? CLEARED. In the United States is racial, ethnic, or national preference an acceptable hiring practice for departments or companies in some situations? FIXED.

All rights reserved. However, if I try with Ubuntu 9.10 on the same Athlon desktop, this same container mounts successfully. And what about "double-click"? This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant.

Relocate? HP Pavilion DV9608nr Dual Boot | Compiz-Check | Partitioning | Compiz Plugins | bash_aliases | Installing nvidia drivers | using dd | gparted live cd | Google cheat sheet | Unix/Linux Though it would be something like that. Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Thanks. The mount offset makes it impossible to access data before the offset-point; while you need that data but want a different location for the superblock. FIXED. Going to be away for 4 months, should we turn off the refrigerator or leave it on with water inside?

cancelled! Is the mass of an individual star almost constant throughout its life? Relocate? Relocate?

What happened to Arch's KISS? Adv Reply Quick Navigation New to Ubuntu Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support New I wasn't sure which one was the right way, and tutorials I found only mentioned ambiguous /dev/xxx I assume that disk backup would take entire 650gb. Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.

Fix? Block bitmap for group 4700 is not in group. (block 154014812) Relocate? The surprising thing from the other server which has same function is we have an entry in /etc/fstab, mount the whole disk instead of the partition: Code: # grep sdc /etc/mtab what I cut & pasted above. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 13:40 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote Finally found this link where

Relocate? For details and our forum data attribution, retention and privacy policy, see here UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your communities Sign up or log in to Tango Icons © Tango Desktop Project. filesystem ext4 fsck share|improve this question edited Dec 10 '13 at 11:52 Braiam 39k1693154 asked Nov 24 '13 at 11:07 Adam 4382619 try help.ubuntu.com/community/FilesystemTroubleshooting –Avinash Raj Nov 24 '13

If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck fsck.ext4: Bad magic number in super-block while using the backup blocksfsck.ext4: going back to original superblock Superblock has an invalid journal (inode 8). And what do you mean by eternity? but whatever. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 23:07 Virtual host with 9 Windows and 1 Ubuntu.

However, if I try with Ubuntu 9.10 on > the same Athlon desktop, this same container mounts successfully. > > Back on the Sheeva Plug, if I downgrade the package to I know that when I run gparted 30 earlier, the partition was still vissible.Nevertheless, I thought that's because of rsync and I thought reboot would fix that, because sdb1 was still trying backup blocks... Does chilli get milder with cooking?

yes Inode bitmap for group 261 is not in group. (block 209743725) Relocate? Maybe your Harddisk is dying. lv01 consist of ext3 filesystem, wich you wants to grow/shrink. Not sure how that would work with a partition image.You can mount an image of a partition directly as loopback.

At worst it'll take 3 days to get a new hard-drive delivered, so I'd like to find a 'without new hardware' solution for that. –Adam Nov 24 '13 at 13:26 Can I recover this?1Ext4 constantly mounts as read-only1Corrupted filesystem - unable to mount /home0Cannot fsck or e2fsck to repair disk. Also, are you sure the partition-table is now correct?