failed to identify i/o error err_mask=0x40 Hallowell Maine

Address 29 Goodrich Ave, Auburn, ME 04210
Phone (207) 782-1959
Website Link http://www.websiterepairguy.com
Hours

failed to identify i/o error err_mask=0x40 Hallowell, Maine

Rename the /boot(flash)/config/plugins directory. 2. I'm also getting those:ATA: abnormal status 0xFF on port 0x177 ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata1.00: (BMDMA stat 0x24) ata1.00: tag 0 cmd 0xa0 Emask This may be causing the issue and should be fixed in any case. The device model is indicated here:Code: [Select]May 21 08:40:59 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata4.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD204UI, 1AQ10001, max UDMA/133
See here if the AHCI setting doesn't work: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=27414.msg241280#msg241280Look here for a possible

ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient I have in the mean established that xfburn (an Xfce front-end to libburn) does work just as well (with much less functionality, but sufficient for me). Two of the drives, hda and hdb, are not configured as AHCI in BIOS. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2.

For details and our forum data attribution, retention and privacy policy, see here Lime Technology - unRAID Server Community Welcome, Guest. I have removed the all_generic_ide option and tried the three modes in my bios (SATA, RAID, AHCI) on 8.04 but it still drops out to busybox with the error. For pata drives, you have the option to use _either_ of them. Can someone possibly explain how to actually fix this issue?

Thanks! VT82C586/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17 [virtual] Memory at 000001f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8] [virtual] Memory at 000003f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [size=1] [virtual] Memory http://phraktured.net Offline #7 2006-09-29 16:49:39 ralvez Member From: Canada Registered: 2005-12-06 Posts: 1,557 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed phrakture I have the same Everything works fine, but if I provide the "nosmp" option to the kernel, I get some (S)ATA errors and the system does not boot.

This may be causing the issue and should be fixed in any case. Also, this problem didn't exist in FC6 ( prob because of different driver ). Can someone point me in a good direction for further reading? Sense: No additional sense information [147486.815629] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 ae a8 7b 20 00 00 08 00 [147486.815645] end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 2930277152 [147486.815654] Buffer

Obviously there is a performance hit when you use the all_generic_ide option. Comment out the HOOKS line and use HOOKS="base udev filesystems". Two of the drives, hda and hdb, are not configured as AHCI in BIOS. Thanks.

looks that this one will take a bit more that that... If all that is correct and from the above test results, I would think it's most likely a hardware issue with the drive, CD/DVD burners fail eventually, I had already 3 I do have SSH access to the box. All of the drive designations should begin with sd.

Try the following: run "mkinitcpio -M" (post it here). Am i getting drive problems again as now its ata4.How can I correlate the ATA errors to the relevant HDD please as I can't see the link in the logs?Cheers! It is difficult to match ata numbers with device names or sd letter assignment. Booting another !SMP kernel works fine.

The device model is indicated here:Code: [Select]May 21 08:40:59 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata4.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD204UI, 1AQ10001, max UDMA/133
See here if the AHCI setting doesn't work: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=27414.msg241280#msg241280Since I set the BIOS Otherwise, there would be a lot of returned MB and disks)Look for a second BIOS setting for the second set of disk controller ports.It has absolutely nothing to do with the It does appear in the MCC (but I believe this is not updated after boot. Tango Icons © Tango Desktop Project.

Offline #22 2006-12-12 02:04:45 vasdee Member Registered: 2006-07-15 Posts: 55 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed i was using the 2.6.19 kernel from testing and I had similar issues some years ago, when I owned a Plextor Premium drive. The drive no longer appears in the output of 'wodim -scanbus'. Rename boot(flash)/extra/.4.

Could it have anything to do with the drives themselves please? it fixed itself, but now it seems like it's back... Could it have anything to do with the drives themselves please?Unless you have older IDE drives connected to an IDE disk controller, no disks should show as hdX. If you need any additional information about the system or its setup, please ask right away!

This was using KDE4 as DE. * 2008.1 -- same result as Suse (using K3b), this time with KDE3. Offline #16 2006-10-02 19:58:51 zezaz Member From: Bordeaux, France Registered: 2004-04-26 Posts: 80 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed It looks like the problem So if it's rated at 48x then it should be ok to write at 48x, not faster nor slower. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage I am CC'ing myself to this bug and will try and assist you in resolving it if I can.

Join Date Jun 2007 Beans 15,549 Re: ERROR: ata1.00 FAILED TO IDENTIFY I've never had any issues with drives ect. I have also realised that one possible hardware change was made in past 6 month -- added a second optical as slave on the same IDE-channel. This got me through the install and everything. The root partition can't be mounted.

The best you can do is trying another firmware revision. 0 Back to top MultiQuote Reply #4 pindakoe frequent Group: Members Posts: 187 Joined: 21-December 06 Posted 17 March 2009 Two of the drives, hda and hdb, are not configured as AHCI in BIOS.