expected error warning ignored after pragma gcc diagnostic East Machias Maine

Address 80 Main St, Machias, ME 04654
Phone (207) 255-3825
Website Link

expected error warning ignored after pragma gcc diagnostic East Machias, Maine

Yeah, for us its a calculated risk. Home Tutorials Photography Debugging Stuff Suppressing GCC Warnings by Patrick Horgan Why this was written This article was originally written by me as part of the Boost Developer Warning Guidelines along Finding out what option controls the warning -fdiagnostics-show-option In GCC, for versions 4.2 and higher, this option instructs the diagnostic machinery to add text to each diagnostic emitted, which indicates which I am compiling on RHEL6.2, gcc 4.4.6 I'm still investigating why it worked for me.

Problematically, you have no way of knowing what the user had this option set to. share|improve this answer answered Aug 15 '13 at 17:13 nos 141k32240373 Thank you, nos! –klm123 Aug 15 '13 at 17:23 FYI: -Wno-unknown-pragmas doesn't help. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. You guys are in for it now :-) Comment 12 Manuel López-Ibáñez 2015-07-20 09:38:48 UTC (In reply to Allan Chandler from comment #11) > Now you've done it.

Some of the warnings were real bugs. Using -Wall in conjunction with this option will not warn about unknown pragmas in system headers. Why not simply use -Wall -Wno-unused-value -Wno-unused-variable ? The mortgage company is trying to force us to make repairs after an insurance claim Security Patch SUPEE-8788 - Possible Problems?

You signed out in another tab or window. Why is absolute zero unattainable? the interesting thing is that pragma push seems to work... You signed in with another tab or window.

Comment 25 Jeffrey Walton 2015-07-23 23:26:42 UTC Jonathan, Manuel, et al - I'm putting this to bed on our side. Does chilli get milder with cooking? If any of you wants to give it a try and need some help, just ask here or in the mailing list. Here's part of the problem, but I don't expect much to come of it: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431.

If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question. 1 I found this Disabling-pragma-warnings solves similar problem –BobLoblaw Aug 15 '13 at 17:13 add a That seems to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Crypto++ is C++ with lots of interfaces, and it performs a fair amount of intermediate calculations used in an assert. Compile GCC 4.6 in a local place and use that instead.

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. You're using an older version. How to get this substring on bash script? Browse other questions tagged c++ warnings or ask your own question.

In that example I posted, I meant GCC_DIAGNOSTIC_AWARE, not GCC_OPTIMIZE_AWARE. This is sure to cause angst. c++ pragma share|improve this question edited May 15 '13 at 2:37 asked May 15 '13 at 2:01 jiafu 1,76042245 3 Those pragmas were introduced in gcc 4.6. Supressing Warnings For A File By Making GCC See It As A System Header Using a pragma to make GCC think a file or part of a file is a system

The added text will look similar to [-Wsign-compare]. How to cope with too slow Wi-Fi at hotel? I have one question, if I can't use pop/push, if the ignore only influence the compiled cpp, not influence other cpp? You may also claim for yourself any bounty or > compensation that may derive from it.

And what about "double-click"? How do you say "root beer"? eddiecohen closed this Nov 12, 2013 Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Be careful, though, that you don't pop too soon.

Or, a project might selectively enable diagnostics and treat them as errors depending on which preprocessor macros are defined. #pragma GCC diagnostic kind option Modifies the disposition of a diagnostic. Its a user who compiling/linking against the library. You signed out in another tab or window. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ /opt/gcc-4.7/bin/gcc -Waggregate-return -c aggregate-return.c $ /opt/gcc-4.8/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation,

Cyberpunk story: Black samurai, skateboarding courier, Mafia selling pizza and Sumerian goddess as a computer virus Exploded Suffixes What are "desires of the flesh"? How would a vagrant civilization evolve? vrz commented Mar 30, 2015 4.4.5 vrz commented Apr 24, 2015 v7.c:772: warning: expected [error|warning|ignored] after '#pragma GCC diagnostic' v7.c:773: warning: unknown option after '#pragma GCC diagnostic' kind v7.c:779: warning: type The reason is, that GCC doesn't know the variable is unused until it hits the closing brace.

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Not polluting you command line seems like a weak excuse given the pollution in the code to support compilers from last millennium (which I know you're getting rid of) and the Beginning at version 4.6, it will push the current state of the diagnostic flags and then turning warning off. If -fdiagostics-show-option told you that the warning was controlled by [-Wsign-compare], then you could say GCC_DIAG_OFF(sign_compare).

People that use boost can now build with flags turned up without being deluged with noise from boost code. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. kind is ‘error’ to treat this diagnostic as an error, ‘warning’ to treat it like a warning (even if -Werror is in effect), or ‘ignored’ if the diagnostic is to be If you or someone else has some free time to finish this work, this is how I would proceed: 1.

Maybe one can do something similar to what we do for cp_parser_initial_pragma, but within the loop and only handling pragma diagnostic. First is the "unused variable" warning due to a static assert. Nevertheless, there are occasional warnings that you cannot or will not fix.