error_code 1062 handler error ha_err_found_dupp_key Avawam Kentucky

Computer and Network Building and repair, Maintenance, Upgrade, Hardware and software Configuration, wireless and wired Network repair and building and Computer Tutoring and Training

Address Salyersville, KY 41465
Phone (606) 205-1176
Website Link

error_code 1062 handler error ha_err_found_dupp_key Avawam, Kentucky

Brian R Cavanagh on April 24, 2013 Updates using session variables aren't reliable, particularly when your server comes under load. But this particular data had been inconsistent for days, and when we expanded our search, we found some inconsistent data over a month old. Note: After starting the slave successfully in either classic or GTID replication we might need to use a combination of Percona tools pt-table-checksum and pt-table-sync to fix the inconsistency problem. Who we are Jobs Press Stats Newsletters Spotlight Drip New!

Check application level, make sure no write directly into slave This including how you connect to mysql in command prompt Split mysql user that can do write and read, So, your SELECT COALESCE(MAX(sequence), 0) FROM backings WHERE project_id = ? Although we realize STOP SLAVE can be made more soft and intelligent. [10 Dec 2008 19:21] Andrei Elkin After speaking to Support we came to consensus: the current is a bug Carson Baker on April 10, 2013 That is so over my head, but the code formatting, and all the other typography on this page, looks killer.

This is about discovering a MySQL bug. You can access the patch from: 2861 Andrei Elkin 2009-04-21 [merge] merge bug#38205 fixes to 5.1-bt [21 Apr 2009 9:54] Andrei Elkin Pushed to 5.1+ -bugteam. [5 May 2009 19:43] The feature request is to stop this "annoying" duplicate key errors on the slave for MyISAM after restarting the slave. [5 Aug 2008 14:04] Eric Jensen At the very least this MariaDB ServerMDEV-9309Galera node crashed with error code 1062Log in PrintExport XMLExport Word Details Type: Bug Status: Open Priority: Major Resolution: Unresolved Affects Version/s: 10.0.21-galera Fix Version/s: None Component/s: Galera Labels: None

We have a configuration like that: 1 master on Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 64 bit SP1 1 slave on Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition 64 bit SP1. Row-Based Replication This is the most accurate replication. We rely on Amazon RDS for managed MySQL, and their default replication mode is MIXED. They can be created from any tier in the app, not needing to be centrally assigned from a db, which removes many of these design problems.

Why had it waited to break? How to solve that issue ? Indeed, STOP SLAVE does not work through kill-query-interface but rather flags the state of the SQL thread a way to stop it only at the end of the being currently handled no longer affects: galera Changed in codership-mysql: importance: Undecided → Medium assignee: nobody → Seppo Jaakola (seppo-jaakola) status: New → Confirmed Gea-Suan Lin (gslin) wrote on 2013-05-13: #2 Thanks!

I thought it would be safe and I would not have to recheck it again and again. Back In Time We found evidence that in the timeframe when the data became inconsistent, a set of transactions hung while waiting for locks after writing to the backings table. share|improve this answer answered Jan 17 '11 at 10:32 ajreal 36.7k75899 1 Thanks for reply, but Slave is not getting updated from anywhere I just used to connect a command This could cause constructing invalid key for wsrep.

Affecting: Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.6 Filed here by: Raghavendra D Prabhu When: 2014-07-12 Confirmed: 2014-07-15 Started work: 2014-07-15 Completed: 2014-07-22 Status Importance Milestone Fix Released Undecided Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.6.19-25.6 Assigned This behavior have been inherited by 5.1. In the Rails community we sometimes treat them as simple data stores, hidden behind ActiveRecord and ActiveRelation. login incorrect Hot Network Questions Why is it a bad idea for management to have constant access to every employee's inbox Can a Legendary monster ignore a diviner's Portent and choose

Other product or company names mentioned may be trademarks or trade names of their respective owner. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Could you please also send us binary log binlog.000003? [22 Jul 2008 23:25] Eric Jensen I don't have the actual binlog still sitting around. The downside is that some queries may not be deterministic: they may not replay the same on each replica.

Don't worry about efficiency, consistency is the only thing that matters. And MySQL was telling us something new: mysql> SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G *************************** 1. On the bright side, I think the problem is that events are executed twice rather than skipped. master> select from tbl; replica> select from tbl; +----+------+----------+ +----+------+----------+ | id | foo | uniq_col | | id | foo | uniq_col | +----+------+----------+ +----+------+----------+ | .. | ... |

This instance of JIRA has been disabled. powered by phorum Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. You can use your same credentials to log in to the new JIRA! Lance Ivy on April 24, 2013 @Peter We considered using an existing unique key, but wanted to try and provide something meaningful to our users.

You're right that SBR has consistency issues though, which is why mixed mode recognizes the key moments to switch to RBR (binary) for accuracy. Any tips on finding the root of esoteric bugs like this one? Instead of replicating the query, it replicates the new version of each row in its entirety. I think *code* is my favorite.

So the current artifact strongly affects the row-based replication. Meaning of S. I realize this is not a well-encapsulated bug report. asked 4 years ago viewed 11095 times active 4 years ago Linked 8 In a MySQL Master/Slave replication, what would happen if I write to the Slave? 3 Fixing tables out

Kickstarter Main menu Skip to content Discover Start a project About us Kickstarter Enter Search Log in Sign up Backing & Hacking News Community The Day the Replication Died Lance What are "desires of the flesh"? When Seconds_Behind_Master = 0, Replication is Fully Caught Up. The insert query of that record is write directly into slave without using replication from the master How to fix?

It just didn't match up. It minimizes how much the master must write to its binlog, and efficiently replays the same query on each replica. Retrieved_Gtid_Set: b9b4712a-df64-11e3-b391-60672090eb04:1-7 Executed_Gtid_Set: 4f6d62ed-df65-11e3-b395-60672090eb04:1, b9b4712a-df64-11e3-b391-60672090eb04:1-6 Auto_Position: 1 Retrieved_Gtid_Set means the retrieved GTIDs from the master Executed_Gtid_Set means the executed GTIDs on the slave.