ext3-fs error attempt to access beyond end of device Ellston Iowa

Address 106 E South St Ste D, Mount Ayr, IA 50854
Phone (641) 464-2109
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error attempt to access beyond end of device Ellston, Iowa

Thanks, b Adv Reply February 19th, 2009 #2 cariboo View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Caffeine Fueled Join Date Mar 2006 Location Williams Lake BeansHidden! Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.235092] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LSID] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled. Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.223630] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK4] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled. dear mr.

YMMV It appears from your "parted" output you used "msdos" disk label instead of the "gpt" disk label and I suspect you may not have the "CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION" option set in your actual block device size on the spot and refuse to mount (xfs does this, iirc). So how would the partition change from GPT to msdos and more importantly, what suggestions might you have so I can mount this file-system.Thanks -Chris Top Post Reply Print view 2 DistroUbuntu Development Release Re: attempt to access beyond end of device, annoyances Have a look at the FakeRaid howto, this may help.

Chaves Slackware 1 07-04-2008 05:28 PM fdisk reports odd "Start "and "End" sectors on single partition eponymous Linux - Software 3 10-01-2007 03:41 PM DMRAID - attempt to access beyond end Thanks for your assistance. Registration at Web Hosting Talk is completely free and takes only a few seconds. Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 32.822836] AppArmor: AppArmor initialized Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 32.822900] Failure registering capabilities with primary security module.

Filesystems within a drive will be checked sequentially, but filesystems on different drives will be checked at the same time to utilize parallelism available in the hardware. Commit interval 5 seconds Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 56.679629] EXT3 FS on sdc1, internal journal Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 56.679633] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. trout 10-16-2008, 10:22 AM #2 dear mr. Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.235994] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC1] (IRQs *16) Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.236293] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC2] (IRQs *17) Feb 18 12:55:59

Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.239637] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCJ] (IRQs 20 21 22) *0, disabled. Learn More Red Hat Product Security Center Engage with our Red Hat Product Security team, access security updates, and ensure your environments are not exposed to any known security vulnerabilities. Register Now, or check out the Site Tour and find out everything Web Hosting Talk has to offer. Mar 21 20:42:30 www kernel: EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery.

Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 32.730791] Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 32.730794] console [tty0] enabled Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 32.734887] Checking aperture... I really appreciate any help. no Error reading block 403537923 (Invalid argument) while getting next inode from scan. Ignore error?

AnalyticaL Linux - Hardware 0 10-01-2004 01:16 PM All times are GMT -5. I am part of publicly-funded group, so you can imagine that in our economy money is tight and highly regulated. When you try to fsck, you get something like The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is ... Or, should I install everything from scratch?

Check out these links: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/fdisk-...eater-2tb.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table Cheers, Troy twfey View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Find More Posts by twfey done Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.081413] ACPI: Core revision 20070126 Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.081527] ACPI: Looking for DSDT in initramfs... Register New Posts Advertising Contact Us Advertise Privacy Statement Terms of Service Sitemap Top Hosting and Cloud Web Hosting Talk HostingCon WHIR Hosting Catalog Hottest Hosts Data Centers Data Center Knowledge Could anyone has an idea or suggestion to help me?

Ignoring ACPI timer override. I obviously killed the copy. LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server Troubleshooting large partition "attempt to access beyond end of device" User Name Remember Me? yes Force rewrite?

When the file system will start using that area is nearly impossible to pretict. I haven't changed anything on my system and if I remember well I never had such kind of problems. The virsh doesn't support "virsh shutdown xxx" because the guest can't load acpi module,so I have to use "virsh destroy" on host. >Have you included /usr/local in your /etc/fstab? Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.237290] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC5] (IRQs *16) Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.237635] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCF] (IRQs 20 21 22) *0

Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.224558] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK5] (IRQs 3 4 *5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15) Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.225387] I'm surprised no automatic fsck was run. (Please note that even "fsck" is not guaranteed to actually *fix* all errors in the FS! But here's what happens when ls the directory: --------------------------START------------------------------ ls: cannot access sdb1/dir3: Input/output error ls: cannot access sdb1/dir1: Input/output error ls: cannot access sdb1/dir2: Input/output error lost+found dir1 dir2 dir3 At this point I'm stuck, I'm hesitant to force the fsck, as obviously parted is not seeing the partition as GPT.

Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 0.000000] Setting APIC routing to flat Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 0.000000] Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: So if your file systems are affected by this behavior depends on - the amount of changes you made to the file system - the time between the (last) change and Or, should I install everything > from scratch? Regards, Jens benjamin_zb27-Nov-2013, 04:16Hi Jens, > >Once a file system is reported as potentially corrupted, run "fsck" - you didn't mention if you followed that advice ("EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with

With drbd 0.7 it was fixed 128MB. Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDP signature @ 0xFFFF8100000F6C00 checksum 0 Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDP 000F6C00, 0014 (r0 Nvidia) Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 Would it be worth asking if the datacentre will ghost the disk onto a new one? When these vm reboot,dmesg show a ext3-fs mount error occurred on /usr/local partion /dev/vda3: EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended and when I wrote into partion /dev/vda3,some

Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest The time now is 06:27 AM. © WebHostingTalk, 1998. Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search Blogs Home Forums HCL Reviews Tutorials Articles Register Search Search Forums Advanced Search Search Tags Search LQ Wiki Search Tutorials/Articles Search Can I use a tool like dd or gddrescue to make the cloning? > Or, a full system installation is needed?

Thanks in advance for your assistance. Can I trust my system after this repair? The -real- annoyance comes in when I try to use a newer kernel. (Intrepid just barely boots on my system) In all of the newer kernels I've tried (I've tried 10+ The numbers you come up with are spot on. [[email protected] ~># e2fsck /dev/sdb1 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 61049000 blocks The physical size of the

Where'd I put that spare hard disk? Feb 18 12:56:08 uCore64 kernel: [ 67.755068] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Feb 18 12:56:18 uCore64 kernel: [ 77.539269] agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0. I haven't changed anything on my system and > > if I remember well I never had such kind of problems. Mar 21 20:42:30 www kernel: kjournald starting.

Feb 18 12:55:59 uCore64 kernel: [ 33.242573] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCZ] (IRQs 20 21 22) *0, disabled. I only partitoned one drive of my raid array the first time I set it up, assuming that because I was using mirroring that the second disk would be an exact