ext2-fs sda1 error unable to read superblock Evansdale Iowa

Address 2806 Falls Ave, Waterloo, IA 50701
Phone (319) 233-9580
Website Link http://www.creboot.com

ext2-fs sda1 error unable to read superblock Evansdale, Iowa

You will also need a destination to copy recovered files to, so let's call it a third blank hard drive, network file share, etc. Kind of stuck in the middle…used all 4 steps from above and still no success >>> 1. yes .......... /dev/sda2: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** /dev/sda2: 59586/30539776 files (0.6% non-contiguous), 3604682/61059048 blocks Now try to mount file system using mount command: # mount /dev/sda2 /mnt You can So easy and so not..

sudo fsck -p /dev/sda1 Secondly ... No way to correct it. I've booted from a live disc again and run fsck quite a lot of times (20 maybe, haven't been counting) and am still getting errors. Try giving it a while to finish that before retrying.

It was really helpfull to me and now I have better overview how ext FS is working. How can we recover from that? 116 evidex on March 21, 2013 said: If the data isn't important, use GParted or similar to delete the partition and recreate it with a Maybe give that a try? 29 sunghost on December 28, 2010 said: You mean instead of fsck.ext4 -p -b "blockid" /dev/md0 do fsck.ext4 -p -b "blockid" /dev/sdb and than the same Thx!

I'm not really sure I can help, but my best advice would be to stop using the drive until you get some help over there, to minimise the possiblity of overwriting Join our community today! Regards, Joseph joethetester View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by joethetester 09-22-2015, 10:16 PM #9 fogpipe Member Registered: Mar Drives are identical so could there be someway to copy superblock from /dev/sda6 to /dev/sdb6 or should i try to mdadm -create command keep fingers crossed that it doesn't destroy data.

except about 0.02%, which is very good. With this tutorial (very good indeed) I managed to get the folder lost+found really full of my files but it starts with # and I can not do anytinh g with Can you access the other partitions/drives in the raid array? I hope you keep posting useful articles like this!! 86 evidex on January 5, 2012 said: Glad to help! 87 k w b on January 8, 2012 said: Well, I can't

Is "halfly" a word? Affecting: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Filed here by: Takashi Sakamoto When: 2011-04-24 Completed: 2013-07-18 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu There are no other words to say thank you. anyway, if i could kiss you without any gay overtones, i would.

Thank you for this. My guess is that the whole drive will be "unallocated". I've done everything you said and have gotten nowhere. There is a rapidly scrolling number for 'read error at', which I assume means that there are lots of read errors Thanks, Mike madsporkmurdererMay 5th, 2009, 07:22 PMI've just been fiddling

My machine is back to like. 55 evidex on June 20, 2011 said: Great to hear!🙂 56 Rogério Madureira on July 4, 2011 said: All my nightmare is registered here: http://goo.gl/WWg9x Sense: Internal target failureend_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 781189162EXT3-fs error (device sdb1): read_inode_bitmap: Cannot read inode bitmap - block_group = 2980, inode_bitmap = 97648641Aborting journal on device sdb1.ext3_abort called.EXT3-fs error Last edited by cfr (2013-02-17 03:18:17) How To Ask Questions The Smart Way | Help VampiresArch Linux | x86_64 | GPT | EFI boot | grub2 | systemd | LVM2 on [email protected]:/bin# e2fsck -b 214990848 /dev/sdc e2fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck: Invalid argument while trying to open /dev/sdc The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem.

I have fixed the problem.After the file system degrade message I did let fsck to finish and and it did end up with message about "File system was modified" (with some Please help me :) madsporkmurdererApril 27th, 2009, 10:55 PMI wrote a script to run fsck -fyv /dev/sda1 50 times in a row, it's still reporting errors. should never try to do any open() on /dev/fdX because of this common problem. Ubuntu Forums > The Ubuntu Forum Community > Ubuntu Official Flavours Support > General Help > [ubuntu] Corrupt superblock PDA View Full Version : [ubuntu] Corrupt superblock madsporkmurdererApril 26th, 2009, 05:00

Linux comes with rsnapshot backup tool that can make hourly, daily and weekly backup of all your servers. My second question is that I am guessing the various backups are from different occasions, is there any way to deduce their order of creation, ie: which is most recent? found initrd image:/boot/initramfs-linux.img [669.873050]EXT4-fs (sda4):unable to read superblock [669.855533]SQUASHFS ERROR: can't find a SQUASHFS superblock on sda4 ext4 sda4 unable to read superblock [/quote] there are two HD and the partitions Most partitions mount fine except for one: the /var partition, where my MySQL tables reside.

At boot the mdadm starts the mirror image with the drives sda1 and sdb1 and names it md127, but the grub.conf and fstab set it as md0, changing it doesn't change If anything, it's worth a shot. 107 Ted on June 6, 2012 said: [email protected]:~# fsck.ext4 -cDfty -C 0 /dev/sda5 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) ext2fs_open2: Bad magic number in super-block /sbin/e2fsck: Superblock invalid, Since it changed the file system to ext2 from ext3 I am little worried. obvious.

So that I can confirm is there any data loss or not.Thanks in advance Satish Amrutwar Reply Link Manish December 21, 2015, 8:30 pmHi ! Now I am not in front of my broken PC and unfortunately yesterday I didn't try to mount the other partitions. The most interesting is the date of posting which is the same as my birthday! There are some things I don't understand, though: fsck.ext4 -v /dev/sda e2fsck 1.41.4 (17-May-2010) fsck.ext4: Group descriptors look bad… trying backup blocks… fsck.ext4: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to

Top maksaraswat Posts: 44 Joined: 2011/10/14 19:00:52 Location: New York Contact: Contact maksaraswat Website Re: EXT3-fs error after running fsck Quote Postby maksaraswat » 2012/02/03 18:12:00 Thanks Milos and Phil! Is it safe trying to run fsck on an eventually clean pertition? I hope it fixes it and will let you know.Thanks for quick response!Mayank Top pschaff Retired Moderator Posts: 18276 Joined: 2006/12/13 20:15:34 Location: Tidewater, Virginia, North America Contact: Contact pschaff Website Proceed anyway? (y,n) n [email protected]:~# sudo mke2fs -n /dev/sda4 mke2fs 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks 13926400 inodes, 55694371

All contributions are hugely appreciated. You saved my 2TB disk!🙂 23 bbking on December 8, 2010 said: hi! no Error1: Corrupt extent header on inode 1049436 exit (translate from german) how can i rescue my data? 28 evidex on December 27, 2010 said: Generally, you'd perform this on the Affecting: debian-installer (Ubuntu Natty) Filed here by: Jean-Baptiste Lallement When: 2011-04-27 Completed: 2013-05-18 Package (Find…) Status Importance Invalid Medium Assigned to Nobody Me Comment on this change (optional) Email me about

but I will swithch everything to UUIDs.2)Yes I have rebooted. Proceed anyway? (y,n) y mke2fs & mount output not shown share|improve this answer edited Jun 16 '13 at 22:00 answered Jun 15 '13 at 19:15 D McKeon 422311 add a comment| It's a program used for recovering drive partitions, where the data has been formatted. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.

Sorry, I can't find, here in this place, the example where was the explanation in how to recover a NTFS partition with linux utils; I remember I red, that the program Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count For many more details, say man 8 mount .any clues on this? While I've established that this isn't going to fix it, I'm pretty sure I've ruled out a hardware failure that is about to kill the disk.