ext2-fs md0 error unable to read superblock Elberfeld Indiana

Address 701 N Weinbach Ave, Evansville, IN 47711
Phone (812) 473-2473
Website Link

ext2-fs md0 error unable to read superblock Elberfeld, Indiana

On the other drives examine says no RAID superblock on /dev/sdX. This also gives you some additional flexibility when replacing failed members. My /etc/sysctl.conf files have nothing in them about the hostname, and rc.sysinit is a system script automatically run at boot time, so I'd back out any changes there. Last edited by BigF (2013-06-12 08:05:52) Offline #11 2013-06-12 08:14:50 dragonauta Member Registered: 2012-05-15 Posts: 313 Website Re: BIG problem ..... [SOLVED - kinda -] I'm glad you solved it!Thanks for

The closest thing I found to my problem was this thread, which suggested running mdadm --create /dev/md0 -v -l 5 -n 4 /dev/sda /dev/sdc /dev/sde /dev/sdd and checking for a valid They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own. Join 78 other followers Meta Register Log in Entries RSS Comments RSS WordPress.com This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Now, make sure your superblock is the problem, by starting a filesystem check, replacing xxx with your partition name.

The first thing was just doing an e2fsck. cat /proc/mounts lists a line "/dev/md0 /mnt/md0 ext3 rw 0 0" 10. U kunt dan proberen een ander superblok te gebruiken, bijvoorbeeld: e2fsck -b 8193 [[email protected] etc]# sudo dumpe2fs /dev/md0 | grep superblock dumpe2fs 1.42.7 (21-Jan-2013) dumpe2fs: Ongeldig argument tijdens openen van /dev/md0[[email protected] IF you are still with me, could you look over my RAID notes.

Please also show the results of running the getinfo_disk.sh script from "How to provide information about your system". From the dmesg output you can see that it had to finish the reshape after you rebooted: [ 9.542918] md/raid:md0: raid level 5 active with 4 out of 5 devices, algorithm Consider it a birthday present😉 75 Amida_Kun on October 14, 2011 said: Estuve por lo menos dos horas intentando recuperar mis datos, ya al final di con tu post, y salvaste If anything, it's worth a shot. 107 Ted on June 6, 2012 said: [email protected]:~# fsck.ext4 -cDfty -C 0 /dev/sda5 e2fsck 1.42.3 (14-May-2012) ext2fs_open2: Bad magic number in super-block /sbin/e2fsck: Superblock invalid,

It should have 4x2000GB drives (sda, sdc, sde, sdd). I just installed the unstable Version of e2fsprogs and get the most of my data back😉 39 Odones on July 6, 2013 said: I have the same problem, can you tell I had everything fixed. If you're running such an important "raid", maybe arch''s more stable "LTS" kernel would be a better/safer environment, since everything had worked before for you, and in future, would be worth

To try and save some time and since this is a second partition, not the boot partition, I think I should be able to attempt to mount the device. Opts: user_xattr # [ 16.933348] audit_printk_skb: 9 callbacks suppressed # [ 22.350011] eth0: no IPv6 routers present # [ 27.094760] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver # [ 27.168812] kvm: Nested Virtualization You messed up something to do with the hostname following some on-line tutorial of dubious pedigree. Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ

What could be wrong here? Related 1Testing my raid array / is my mdadm raid working OK?1MDADM Raid 0 won't mount: one drive has bad superblock2Raid Issues Cannot Boot and Getting Superblock Errors3mdadm warning (system unbootable) Can someone with experience please help me? In post #8, the EXT3 driver can't read the superblock of the filesystem[A block that describes information like: fs label, location of root directory, size of the filesystem, block-count, location of

root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.18-4 ro root=/dev/md0 Is this the original grub configuration for Linux and is md0 the correct root device? How do I help minimize interruptions during group meetings as a student? The time now is 05:16 AM. actual disk size mismatch1An existing mdadm RAID5 is not mounting, Either a problem drive or Superblock1mount mdadm disk without partition table3Resize MDADM/Software RAID underlying partition and filesystem3New RAID array will not

I have now bookmarked your site. mdadm --examine --scan: ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 metadata=0.90 UUID=fd522a0f:2de72d76:f2afdfe9:5e3c9df1 No help there. goodl luck! –Brad May 18 '11 at 14:43 Sorry for coming back to this so late. Thanks, Dave richardjhMarch 8th, 2010, 11:10 PMIt looks like the raid devices are already assembled, which makes it a bit easier.

After the boot has finished then plug in the data connector for the SATA HD. I would have sworn /proc/mdstat reported that it was finished before I performed the resize. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. At this point I'm pretty much out of my depth, so I hope there's someone here who can point me in some good directions.

This article is actually the biggest draw to the site at the moment🙂 5 Fabricio on July 5, 2010 said: Saved my day!!! Due to a power outage I have been unable to boot from the drive so I've been using a Live DVD. At this point I felt confident enough to resize it. % sudo resize2fs /dev/md0 This completed without a peep. ToniT View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by ToniT 09-09-2004, 11:40 AM #13 denniz Member Registered: Apr 2004 Location: amsterdam

cat /proc/mounts gives: rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/2/root2 / ext3 rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw,nodiratime 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw At first I was afraid I'd be petrified Is there any job that can't be automated? Abort? [email protected]:~$ sudo e2fsck -f /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) e2fsck: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...

but if I try to mount either of the arrays, I still get: [email protected]:~# mount /dev/md1 /mnt/data mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md1, missing codepage or helper Thanx! 18 evidex on October 28, 2010 said: Glad to be of service🙂 19 Pointer Men's Basketball on October 30, 2010 said: Maybe you should edit the page subject title Repair The numbers to the left of the partition listings are mine for the purposes of identification. Please do not send me a PM asking for help...

I retried the command using sda1, sdc1, etc, but then I get this: mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric mdadm: layout kjournald starting. It gives me the infamous error message: [I]"wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on ez, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - Make space between rows constant How would a vagrant civilization evolve?

any guidance would be much appreciated. Topics: Active | Unanswered Index »Installation »BIG problem ..... [SOLVED - kinda -] Pages: 1 #1 2013-06-10 07:02:12 BigF Member Registered: 2012-02-17 Posts: 44 BIG problem ..... [SOLVED - kinda -] I ran dumpe2fs on /sda and got a valid output, but it is too long for this comment. And my fault was that i want to test the performance with: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct, after that i realised that all my data a somewhere ;( now i

I need help please. I need my sdb1's data back plz help me 59 Rogério Madureira on July 5, 2011 said: Thank you very much for the reply. I tried various methods to reassemble the array but nothing has worked so far. Wrote to disk and exited.

Ok, I re-readed what you are doing and that howto you are following. Smartmontools reports them healty, and i dont see any "failed" or errors inhere.When i manually try to mount i do get a complaint about a superblok :-(((( [[email protected] etc]# mount /dev/md0