freebsd cpu0 local apic error 0x40 Screven Georgia

Address 730 Strickland Cir, Hortense, GA 31543
Phone (912) 473-9376
Website Link http://itnetworkconsultants.com
Hours

freebsd cpu0 local apic error 0x40 Screven, Georgia

of Isochronous channels is 4. Mar 9 05:03:00 jpr1 kernel: WARNING: /sites was not properly dismounted Mar 9 05:17:03 jpr1 kernel: ugen0.2: at usbus0 (disconnected)wered Mar 9 05:17:03 jpr1 kernel: ukbd0: at uhub0, port 2, Instead we have named it PRERELEASE, and used a "build knob" to have the release build call itself the BETA. So, I'm about to do what we've tried to avoid before which is do a commit that makes stable/9 call itself 9.1-BETA1.

Logged rekd0514 Jr. PGP 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ [emailprotected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[emailprotected]" CD: 2ms To verify, go to Diagnostics -> Command Prompt. Or is this a hw/sw bug?

How can I fix this? of Isochronous channels is 4. > Mar  9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:d8:00:01:46:4c:23 > Mar  9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. > Mar  9 04:58:51 Mitt kontoSökMapsYouTubePlayNyheterGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÖversättFotonMerWalletDokumentBloggerKontakterHangoutsÄnnu mer från GoogleLogga inDolda fältSök efter grupper eller meddelanden FreeBSD › freebsd-stable Search everywhere only in this topic Advanced Search error message "CPU0: local APIC error 0x40" Classic List Such interrupts are not be delivered to the processor; the local APIC will never set an IRR bit in the range 0 to 15.

Hence, I was thinking perhaps the hardware is all of a sudden showing an issue. http://www.buydvb.net/pm2c-pcie-mini-pcie-adapter_p17.htmlFor 1 it's $24.99 + 4.42 = $29.41 and for 2 it's $49.98 + 6.71 = $56.69 ( use promo code 9128c08514 for $5 off $50) I got the customer service I can break into DDB via the serial > over lan interface, and am running a debug/witness kernel at the moment > (I was running GENERIC previously). Attached as a .txt file -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, [hidden email] Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/_______________________________________________ [hidden email]

signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Previous Message by Thread: WARNING: stable/9 -> 9.1-BETA1... Adaptive mode attempts to strike a balance by degrading performance when the system appears idle and increasing it when the system is busy. Here's an example output of my setup (Intel Core Solo T1350; 133MHz FSB). CC'ing John who might have some ideas about the LAPIC stuff. -- | Jeremy Chadwick

config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) Mar 9 12:59:40 jpr1 kernel: pid 3022 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6stem is notMar 9 12:59:48 jpr1 kernel: pid 3257 Minimum mode selects the lowest performance values to get the most power savings. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3050 @ 2.13GHz (2128.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Family = I could not even break into the debugger.

I installed an Intel ... I can't seem to find anything even on ebay. Its the first time I have ever seen this error. Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:d8:00:01:46:4c:23 Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports.

I have other bad experiences with IBM's hardware and have given up on them for running FreeBSD. Some people really freak out when they see BETA in > anything. A workaround might be to disable multiprocessor support in the BIOS (specifically Advanced -> Advanced Processor Options -> Core-Multi-Processing = Disabled). Error bit 0x40 means an interrupt message was sent to the CPU with an illegal vector (< 32).

PGP 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stableTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" mdtancsa Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Someone suggested bad hardware ? How can I fix this? Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes.

Any ideas? Such interrupts are not be delivered to the processor; the local APIC will never set an IRR bit in the range 0 to 15. Wink,but SteveThank you, it would be nice to get it to that 16W though if possible. When I grep the dmesg, I can find this message. -- Best regards, Yanhui _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stableTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" Jack L.-3 Reply |

Mar 10 03:10:23 jpr1 rc.shutdown: 30 second watchdog timeout expired. All of the places that send IPIs have the interrupt vectors hard-coded as constant values in the code. Member Posts: 42 Karma: +0/-0 Re: pfsense on a notebook « Reply #3 on: October 27, 2011, 07:53:58 pm » Yes, but the pfsense router will be sitting in the back Not sure.

Years ago I ran pFsense on a Pentium III notebook and a d-link 10/100 card. Is there > a way to narrow that down ? Logged rekd0514 Jr. I too get this error all the time on my AMD 6400+ Dual Core with an ASUS motherboard.

Member Posts: 42 Karma: +0/-0 Re: pfsense on a notebook « Reply #6 on: October 29, 2011, 12:18:22 pm » Quote from: ScottNJ on October 28, 2011, 07:29:45 pmWhy not just Filesystem is not clean - run fsckpr1 kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ada0. It is most likely a harmless bug in your BIOS. And sorry to be so > blunt but...

FreeBSD 5.4 on an old bi-processor ... When I installed pfsense on Windows 7 this computer was idling at 16W and it is at 23W now with pfsense. K8> on cpu1 Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: device_attach: powernow1 attach returned 6 Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: firewire0: 1 nodes, Your Core 2 Duo will have dev.cpu.1.* output as well because of the 2nd core.Code: [Select]$ sysctl dev.cpu
dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU
dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu
dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU0
dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0
dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0
dev.cpu.0.freq:

I got this from Section 10.5.3 of Intel's IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, Volume 3A: http://developer.intel.com/design/processor/manuals/253668.pdfThe motherboard looks like a Supermicro X7SBA or something along those lines (I can tell Is there a way to narrow that down ? Hi, I tested a recent IBM machine similar to yours recently (I don't know if it was exactly the same model, but it was probably an M3), and observed a number This is for anyone who might be interested in trying this.

Type:sysctl dev.cpuThe output of "dev.cpu.0.freq_levels" will list the frequency steps available. Any ideas? But past > experiences have shown us that not everybody knows that, and/or aren't > paying attention to the fact a release is under way. Details: - FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday - Intel L440GX+ main board, dual ... _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To ...

reproduced repeatedly. Googling didnt > really show much definitive. No, was trying to think if there was a scenario where an I/O APIC pin or MSI message could specify an illegal vector. K8> on cpu0 > Mar  9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: device_attach: powernow0 attach returned 6 > Mar  9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: powernow1:

Googling didnt > really show much definitive.  Someone suggested bad hardware ? Default = pass all, Logging = disabled Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1 kernel: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging disabled Mar 9 04:58:51 jpr1