findrecord error Mckinleyville California

Address 8 5th St, Eureka, CA 95501
Phone (707) 444-8433
Website Link http://www.radc.com
Hours

findrecord error Mckinleyville, California

I reckon, you could get around that ... Appears to do exactly what I want (so far), any thoughts? 0 Message Author Comment by:zaphod_beeblebrox2006-04-21 Just further information. Solve problems - It's Free Create your account in seconds E-mail address is taken If this is your account,sign in here Email address Username Between 5 and 30 characters. Good luck! (°v°) 0 LVL 42 Overall: Level 42 MS Access 24 Message Expert Comment by:dqmq2006-04-16 > but because the control is not bound to anything I believe this is

Assuming you want the current record of the form to move, read on. However this approach gives a lower level of integration with your user interface. I would be grateful if someone has an answer and perhaps tips on do's/donts with debugging in Access. mishejView Member Profile Jan 16 2004, 01:41 AM Post#5Retired ModeratorPosts: 11,289Joined: 25-September 02From: Milwaukee, WIYes, my experience is that it is usually a timing issue.

Guest Guest Hi guys, Getting very annoyed with this one. It is invaluable in some of its forms such as opening a report or form (DoCmd.OpenForm...) but in some other situations its extremely trouble some and there are usually better methods When I create the query it still stubbornly sits at read only. Advertisements Latest Threads Happy Birthday Captain Zed!

Double clicking on the subrecord changes the subform to a form that gives more detailed information on that specific subrecord. Usually a compact or compile/save will clear this problem. swatijadhav commented Oct 1, 2015 yeah, got your point.. When the user takes an action that "completes" a search, call a procedure on the View-Update form, passing it the appropriate value.

Double clicking on the subrecord changes the subform to a form that gives more detailed information on that specific subrecord. Sed replace specific line in file Cyberpunk story: Black samurai, skateboarding courier, Mafia selling pizza and Sumerian goddess as a computer virus If Dumbledore is the most powerful wizard (allegedly), why Also you are welcome to read my post about error handling –Gennady Dogaev Mar 27 at 12:31 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 0 down vote More About Us...

I don't have any macros Ian Stuart View Public Profile Find More Posts by Ian Stuart

08-28-2003, 05:50 AM #2 indesisiv Access - What's that? Can this be done? There is a check to ensure this isnt null prior to running the find.HAs background, I have a search form that is used to search another form based upon the value Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums: Talk To Other Members Notification Of Responses To Questions Favorite Forums One Click Access Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

When I use a number field in place of the text field that I want to search, I don't get any errors. What's going on here? On the search form, leave the "View-Update" form open. asked 6 months ago viewed 102 times active 6 months ago Related 1Ember.js - How to handle error with DS.store.find() method0How should I filter items of a user?1Server side error processing

well .. so that might seem redundant .. Im very familiar with code in Excel and agree Sendkeys or similar functions are the last thing you should use as its opens up other issues. If I am reading this correctly you want a form to open up that will display the record details when you doubleclick the subform Expand|Select|Wrap|Line Numbers PrivateSubForm_DblClick(CancelAsInteger) DimstrCritasString strCrit="[ID]="&Me.ID Docmd.OpenForm"frmInitiative",,,strCrit EndSub

Still the same problem. A Chang replied Oct 31, 2013 You can try to use Filter instead of FindRecord. DécioC posted Oct 13, 2016 at 11:28 AM Loading... This error may occur when starting DoCmd.FindRecord from a button under one of the following conditions: The button is placed on the Header or Footer section of a form - or

Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. instead, I use chr(34) which is the ascii code for a "So, with your example, simply.FindFirst "[DecisionNo] = " & chr(34) & varDecisionNo & chr(34)never failed me, and no messing around If this control is bound to a field of the datasource the FindRecord can be successfully executed. Here's the modified code: > > > > Forms![CAN6].Requery > > DoCmd.OpenForm ("CAN6") > > Forms![CAN6]![CANDIDATEID].Visible = True > > Forms![CAN6]![CANDIDATEID].SetFocus > > DoCmd.FindRecord Forms![CAN2 INPUT]![CANDIDATEID], acEntire, , , , >

What I am trying to do is, based on the search result in Search Form, I'm trying to populate details on the View-Update Form. Alternatively, you can search for data located at the beginning of the field, acStart, or data in any part of the field, acAnywhere. Similar topics DoCmd.FindRecord ends at last record Using DoCmd.FindRecord hande asp error Setting up error pages DoCmd.OpenQuery and error trapping Logging errors with ASP 404 error pages customized error message Prevent Use False to start the search at the record following the current record.

My field "[DecisionNo] " is a text field. But here it will fix only one specific test..I have other many tests which failing due to findRecord I will try out the above suggestion and will update it here.. Member Login Remember Me Forgot your password? Download Code VBA Using DoCmd.FindRecord Specify what to look for - Match Search in current or all fields Search start point and direction Determine if record was found or NoMatch Alternative:

thanks Andrew "Wayne Morgan" wrote: > Is the form [CAN2 INPUT] open when you run this? Hello and welcome to PC Review. Error 2162: A macro set to one of the current field's properties failed because of an error in a FindRecord action argument. The problem line from above should read like this: With Me.RecordsetClone .FindFirst "[DecisionNo] = ' " & varDecisionNo & " ' " Ostruggle greatly with funky string syntax, but I found

Do i need to bind it to a single record, such as dqmq suggested above? The FindRecord action will then begin searching from the start of the record. odd ..