fatal error asm/errno.h ubuntu Hermosa Beach California

Computer repair shop. In-shop or on-site repair.

Address 2600 Hermosa Ave, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Phone (866) 707-3723
Website Link http://www.serafincomputerservice.com
Hours

fatal error asm/errno.h ubuntu Hermosa Beach, California

Sincerely, Angelo > > > Regards, > Arnout > > [snip] > -- > Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind linux gcc share|improve this question asked Feb 10 '13 at 7:16 mahmood 4,861226095 add a comment| 7 Answers 7 active oldest votes up vote 21 down vote I think the package I'm using Linaro 2014.09 toolchain. fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory0How to use gcc 4.9 when it's installed in same directory as newer gcc1'make' error - glib.h no such file or directory on Raspberry

Remove it and either create the symlink yourself or reinstall the gcc-multilib package. > Seems to be the same cause then, I first thought it was again a bug in > See http://bugs.debian.org/638418 for details. That's how the GCC docs recommend that GCC be built. House of Santa Claus With the passing of Thai King Bhumibol, are there any customs/etiquette as a traveler I should be aware of?

So installing linux-libc-dev:i386 fixes the problem, but as you say, if that's deprecated then we'll need a long term solution (like maybe bundling the 32-bit libraries with NaCl). Luajit is failing with this error: /usr/include/linux/errno.h:1:23: fatal error: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory #include This is the command buildroot produces: /usr/bin/make -j9 PREFIX="/usr" STATIC_CC="/home/angelo/DEV/BUILDROOT/br_acqua_dev/host/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" DYNAMIC_CC="/home/angelo/DEV/BUILDROOT/br_acqua_dev/host/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -fPIC" TARGET_LD="/home/angelo/DEV/BUILDROOT/br_acqua_dev/host/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" TARGET_AR="/home/angelo/DEV/BUILDROOT/br_acqua_dev/host/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-ar Thank you for your time! > > Sincerely, Angelo. > >> >> Best regards, >> >> Thomas >> -- >> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons >> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Trying to tear apart the header files like that....

later in the build I get this failure. Bug48879 - Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h Summary: Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h Status: RESOLVED INVALID Alias: None Product: gcc Classification: Unclassified Component: bootstrap (show other bugs) Version: 4.7.0 Importance: P3 share|improve this answer edited Sep 30 '14 at 0:02 answered Sep 29 '14 at 19:35 muru 68.9k12125176 Hi I just tried installing that but it said it was already La obsesión por su cuerpo lo mató de cáncer Los S.O.

For example: $ /usr/local/bin/gcc-4.8.1 # or simply gcc-4.8.1, since this folder is in your PATH Note how I'm running configure and make from a different directory, outside of where the GCC Comment 5 by [email protected], Sep 3 2014 Processing Oh.. Do you run 'gclient runhooks'? Not the answer you're looking for?

Honestly there is no way I can have screwed up my installation, because it's cleanly pulled from git (rev. 591cb698d7768a52c1f1c527345782b500142edc). Missing files might mean that some package is damaged; again, ask your package manager to check everything and (re)install missing/broken pieces. Regards, Arnout [snip] -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect Comment 7 eric 2012-07-03 16:12:57 UTC I had the same problem, and fixed it by copying "/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/" from another 32bit system to your current system.

One of the package it uses is linux-libc-dev. Then > stage 1 completed and the same error occurred at the begining of stage 2 > (setting just CFLAGS). You should now read the documentation and learn how to configure your IRCd. On trusty this is part of the "linux-libc-dev:i386" package.

It's making host headers point to >> target headers. One is find /usr/include -name errno.h to see if it's hiding in version-specific directory. But it seems > that the compilation needs to know where is errno.h. It's highly recommended when building stuff from source that you use --prefix flag (and with GCC, the --program-suffix flag) while configuring.

Going back to priority 1 since there is no good workaround for the breakpad issue. (Having to manually install a package is OK; having to keep uncommitted changes around in an Currently 4.8.2 and 4.9.1 are installed. Comment 4 Blanca Mancilla 2011-05-05 22:05:53 UTC Created attachment 24195 [details] output of "gcc -v -x c /dev/null -c" Comment 5 Blanca Mancilla 2011-05-05 22:09:28 UTC (In reply to comment #2) Is it possible that this > symlink got removed by a botched package install?

Sincerely, Angelo. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com-- Profile: http://it.linkedin.com/in/compagnucciangelo_______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list que puedes usar para revivir tu viejo PC KDE cumple 20 años Valve utiliza Kubuntu para las demostraciones de Steam VR Ubuntu 16.10 Unity 8 Lubuntu 16.10 Alternate 0 comentarios - Comment 1 by [email protected], Sep 3 2014 Processing The errno.h you need to build this configuration is /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/errno.h. I think I have to install build-essential.

Acknowledgement sent to François Revol : Extra info received and forwarded to list. Your Ubuntu is some 2 years old, i.e., ancient. See >> http://bugs.debian.org/638418 for details. >> > > Indeed it's an empty folder here. It usually compiles without a problem until this patch: luajit: needs for 32bit archictectures a 32bit host gcc So the host compiler doesn't look anymore for the 64bit version of linux-libc-dev

Setting up chromium on a new machine: Ubuntu 14.04 trusty (x86-64) After running "build/install-build-deps.sh" and then trying to "ninja -C out/Debug chrome", I see the same error as mentioned in #17: cd native_client_sdk/src 2. Can you give the Buildroot configuration and version that produces this issue? > /usr/include/linux/errno.h:1:23: fatal error: asm/errno.h: No such > file or directory > #include > > This is the It's making host headers point to target headers.

Seems to be the same cause then, I first thought it was again a bug in libc6-dev-i386 until I apt-file searched, and now you tell me it's in gcc-multilib :P I'd Request was from Ben Hutchings to [email protected] (Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:13:27 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.