fsck error 2 while executing fsck.ntfs-3g Snowflake Arizona

Address Winslow, AZ 86047
Phone (928) 613-6886
Website Link

fsck error 2 while executing fsck.ntfs-3g Snowflake, Arizona

fsck.reiserfs --fix-fixable /dev/sda1 - does basic fixes but will not rebuild filesystem tree fsck.reiserfs --scan-whole-partition --rebuild-tree /dev/sda1 - if basic check recommends running with --rebuild-tree, run it with --scan-whole-partition and do Try to get a Windows install going - preferably with the newest version of Windows as Microsoft is presumably constantly improving chkdsk (I hope..) New versions of Windows are often available OK Processing of $MFT and $MFTMirr completed successfully. How can I make this error go away?

This is similar to CHK files created by scandisk and chkdisk on MS Windows. I remembered that the Old-Polack was recommending fsck -f /dev/sdxy command to be run as root on unmounted partition when booting from LiveCD. Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Bug attachments Dependencies.txt (edit) Add attachment • Take the tour • Read the guide © 2004-2016 CanonicalLtd. • Terms of use But I don't know why it's happened.

i.e.: touch /forcefsck Filesystems that have 0 or nothing specified in the sixth column of your /etc/fstab, will not be checked Till Ubuntu 6.06 you can also issue shutdown -rF now Nevertheless, one can still interrupt the check and let the system boot up on a possibly corrupted filesystem. 2 things can go wrong fsck dies - If fsck dies for whatever fsck fails to fix all errors with default settings - If fsck fails to fix all errors with default settings, it will ask to be run manually by the user. So, apparently the defaults changed between Natty and Oneiric and the upgrade didn't make any conversions. –Scott Severance Dec 8 '11 at 22:59 1 Me thinks that the "pass" argument

I got this output: fsck from util-linux 2.19.1 fsck: fsck.ntfs: not found fsck: Error 2 while executing fsck.ntfs for /dev/sda1 I can't find fsck.ntfs, and command-not-found doesn't help either. vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. prof. fsck.ext4 -f -y /dev/sda1 - whereas previously fsck would ask for user input before fixing any nontrivial problems, -y means that it will simply assume you want to answer "YES" to

share|improve this answer edited Jan 26 '12 at 3:23 Scott Severance 8,14252562 answered Dec 8 '11 at 14:12 enzotib 44.7k492126 2 Actually, that's not exactly accurate. Browse other questions tagged fsck debian-wheezy or ask your own question. SMART says disk is good1Linux, corrupted file, ran fsck, file still corrupted1NTFS drive recognized by Linux, not by Windows2Mark bad blocks as unusable on NTFS using linux0Corrupt disk after fsck for Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the

Can I buy my plane ticket to exit the US to Mexico? How do I run a scandisk / chkdisk / fsck on my ntfs-3g mounted NTFS drives? See e2fsck cheatsheet for details how. You asked how to run this check and you have your answer, you didn't say there was anything wrong with anything.

Join & Ask a Question Need Help in Real-Time? If you have a focus for your spell casting do you need to pay materials? ntfsfix is NOT a Linux version of chkdsk. Not cool for a server to wait for a keypress during boot. –KarlP Dec 12 '11 at 21:04 add a comment| up vote 5 down vote Micro's answer worked for me,

So...did that fix whatever was "corrupt" about it? 3) There's no substitute for Windows in this case, and you shouldn't be using NTFS unless you're running a Windows system. This will take a long time. Regards, David. Just for the record, I tried this and this was the result: ( My initial link creation worked OK, I just included this first line so we are clear I created

Reiserfsck is a very talkative tool that will let you know what to do should it find errors. Also I experienced that Linux lets you do things such as putting question marks in your filenames; this is officially permitted by NTFS standards but here's the joke: the Windows driver But apparently Windows thinks the filesysystems are just fine. Flanagan Jun 22 '13 at 12:32 Thanks @A.L.Flanagan :) –Ruraj Jun 24 '13 at 15:37 I would suggest adding this as a comment to Micro's answer, rather

Review paper/book on Finite Difference Methods for PDEs Why did my electrician put metal plates wherever the stud is drilled through? I just upgraded recently and I have had pass=3 set on my ntfs partitions, and I never had any problem until the first boot in oneiric. Is there any job that can't be automated? OK Processing of $MFT and $MFTMirr completed successfully.

Privacy Policy Site Map Support Terms of Use skip to main | skip to sidebar ZEXPEX Monday, 24 October 2011 Solved: error fsck fsck.ntfs not found fsck: Error 2 while executing xfs_repair is clever enough to not process multiple AGs on same disks. Please use the Forum search and Wiki search for immediate help Please mark your thread as Solved when appropriate New to technical forums?: How To Ask Questions The Smart Way Adv It is recommended that user lets it finish the check.

Last edited by yodo (2008-05-28 02:24:49) Offline Pages: 1 Index »Applications & Desktop Environments »[SOLVED] fsck does not check ntfs-file system Board footer Jump to Newbie Corner Installation Kernel & Hardware Join Date Mar 2008 Location London, UK Beans 47 DistroUbuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat Re: chkdisk / fsck on NTFS drives? Originally Posted by dcstar It didn't find any problems. By default, it would use up to 75% of available ram.

NTFS partition /dev/sda1 was processed successfully. your xfs_repair is older than version 2.9.4 or you will make the checks even slower on GNU/Linux. linux ntfs fsck share|improve this question asked Jan 15 '11 at 21:33 vivin 6031615 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 9 down vote accepted Yes. Do NOT bother with this if any of these is true for your system: you created your XFS filesystem with only a single AG.

asked 2 years ago viewed 1979 times active 2 years ago Related 1Slow ext4 fsck9ext3 fsck time versus partition size9How dangerous is it to interrupt an fsck?0run fsck on mounted partition4is Solved fsck NTFS problem Posted on 2010-12-22 Linux Linux OS Dev Shell Scripting 3 Verified Solutions 7 Comments 5,291 Views Last Modified: 2012-05-10 Hi, I'm trying to call the command sudo Phase 3 (inode discovery and checks) and Phase 4 (extent discovery and checking) work sequentially through filesystem's allocation groups (AG). Making sense of U.S.

This is a xubuntu 14.04 64 bit system. Basic filesystem checks and repairs The most common method of checking filesystem's health is by running what's commonly known as the fsck utility. Logical fallacy: X is bad, Y is worse, thus X is not bad New tech, old clothes Appease Your Google Overlords: Draw the "G" Logo Export The $PATH Variable, Line-By-Line Is