ext3-fs error device sda5 in start_transaction journal has aborted Excel Alabama

Address 125 Beck St, Monroeville, AL 36460
Phone (251) 575-3087
Website Link
Hours

ext3-fs error device sda5 in start_transaction journal has aborted Excel, Alabama

Events Events Community CornerAwards & Recognition Behind the Scenes Feedback Forum Cisco Certifications Cisco Press Café Cisco On Demand Support & Downloads Community Resources Security Alerts Security Alerts News News Video tune2fs -j /dev/*** <----- adds back the journal Once this is done, remount the filesystem as read-write (mount -o remount,rw /) and create a test file (touch test.txt) to see Try this for single user, read-only mode. 1. Does this seem like bad drives?

For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. Cavallaro 2009-11-27 14:29:19 EST Thank you Eric! http://rhts.redhat.com/cgi-bin/rhts/test_log.cgi?id=4551390 Comment 1 Vivek Goyal 2008-10-27 15:31:35 EDT Noticed it one more time. Subscribing...

Red Hat Technical support told us to bring it to this bug. Actual results: Expected results: No error messages. I don't think there's anything logged about the occurance because with the disk gone there was nowhere to log it.... If the error indicates a hardware problem rather than a software bug, they can let you know.

All product names are trademarks of their respective companies. Please let us know if you need more details, we are seeing this issue on weekly basis. LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted User Name Remember Me? What steps have you taken to resolve the issue.

Have there been any solutions to this foundHere is my setupSuper Micro 6015B-3V serverSuperMicro Zero Channel Raid card with 256mg (Adaptec 4000SAS Raid)Supermicro IPMI card AOC-SIMSO(+)4 – Hitchi 74 gig 15K EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #7618561: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1179011410, rec_len=58182, name_len=139 EXT3-fs error (device That's not true. tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/*** <------ strips the journal 2.

The partitions were in read only mode and I couldn't even execute a "shutdown -r" without generating an Input/Output error. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. fsck the partition e2fsck -y /dev/*** 3. Is there any sort of stress test I can run to attempt to duplicate this problem?

We are going to run the updates at dell for the drivers for the raid controller, but still a bit stumped! Comment 23 kashyap 2009-10-27 04:43:28 EDT Tomas, What are the exact steps to reproduce this ? EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem check. Raid array 5 Posts: 33 Original Poster Rep: Iv'e gone through and updated all the drivers from dell: dkms-2.0.13-1.noarch.rpm Bcom_LAN_NX2_26_Linux_DKMS_A00.tar from: http://support.dell.com/support/down...s=LIN4&osl=EN# and also made sure that there are no users

Search form Search Search IP Telephony Cisco Support Community Cisco.com Search Language: EnglishEnglish 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish) Português (Portuguese) Pусский (Russian) 简体中文 (Chinese) Contact Us Help Follow Us Facebook This is the first time using Linux on our servers, and I really need to get over this problem so any help will be greatly appreciated. Want to know which application is best for the job? Is this a Kernal Bug ?

Again when we contact Redhat saying its kernel bug we will send test kernel update and reproduce the issue. Comment 36 Eric Sandeen 2009-11-16 10:47:43 EST For anyone reporting this bug, please be sure to look earlier in the logs for storage errors; including the entire dmesg in the report Last edited by netsecsvc; 01-02-2007 at 08:27 AM. Comment 24 Tomas Henzl 2009-10-27 09:51:46 EDT (In reply to comment #23) > What are the exact steps to reproduce this ?

EXT3 FS on hdh1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. We use here a modified version adapted to our test system, I can send you this version too, but it could be not easy to use alone. Raid array 5 Posts: 33 Original Poster Rep: I don't have Vmware, and no huge files either, it's a new machine and hasn't been loaded yet. Additional info: Error logs are here.

Do you see the same symptoms, (error messages) or is your case different ? I'm using an IBM x360 server with a ServeRAID4 controller connected to a Compaq external array. Maybe is this a hw issue ? Any advise?Thanks in advance.

Steps to Reproduce: 1. reelwylde Linux - General 4 09-08-2005 03:00 PM EXT3-fs: error loading journal canyon289 Fedora 2 06-23-2005 03:02 PM All times are GMT -5. EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #7618561: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1179011410, rec_len=58182, name_len=139 ext3_abort called. All rights reserved.

Password Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues. If this doesn't work then a trickier option is also available to you. 1. You can even set the inode sizes for large files. Join our community today!

Relevant part of dmesg:megasas: 00.00.02.00 Sat Oct 15 19:03:34 EDT 2005megasas: 0x1028:0x0015:0x1028:0x1f03: bus 2:slot 14:func 0ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:02:0e.0[A] -> GSI 78 (level, low) -> IRQ 193scsi0 : LSI Logic SAS Solve problems - It's Free Create your account in seconds E-mail address is taken If this is your account,sign in here Email address Username Between 5 and 30 characters. Search this Thread 11-07-2006, 02:58 AM #1 pilot11 Member Registered: Sep 2006 Location: Surrey, UK Distribution: CentOs version 4 X86_64 Dell PowerEdge 2900 2 gig Ram. EXT3-fs error (device sdb1): ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #1982465: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1179011410, rec_len=46658, name_len=117 ext3_abort called.

I have no idea what is causing this and have searched Google and found several other instances of this error without a successful conclusion. Again after one month same issue occured on same server .